Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Michigan 3-year-old shoots mother in the head [View all]lark
(26,088 posts)30. She absolutely should be arrested.
Not only did the 3 year old have access to a gun, it wasn't locked and it was loaded and obviously ready to go. Getting shot herself isn't sufficient, it easily could have been the baby himself.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What can you say, poor woman and check if she should be arrested because her 3 yo had access to a
trillion
Feb 2016
#1
this should cause revulsion of the nra and gun loving philosophy - but it won't
MariaThinks
Feb 2016
#17
And just how do you plan on accomplishing that without starting a civil war? eom.
GGJohn
Feb 2016
#7
I also don't want the police and military to be the only ones with tanks. Oh wait
MillennialDem
Feb 2016
#22
Pretty cost prohibitive. The number of fully functional tanks that would be used on
MillennialDem
Feb 2016
#27
Absolutism is indeed, the last refuge of the irrational, the myopic and the dogmatic
LanternWaste
Feb 2016
#47
The detail that will be coming is no charges were pressed becuase it was an unfortunate "accident."
trillion
Feb 2016
#38
Poisoning people with lead in the water apparently isn't working fast enough. :( n/t
eggplant
Feb 2016
#21
Serves her right for letting a baby have access to a gun. Of course, if she'd given the baby
valerief
Feb 2016
#19
More important is that she has already reproduced, so she hasn't eliminated her genes from future
tblue37
Feb 2016
#41
Can the gun makers now be legislated into safety mechanisms on guns now?! This is crazy-making!
Dont call me Shirley
Feb 2016
#52