Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: CIA leaker: Clinton 'given a pass' for emails [View all]GreydeeThos
(958 posts)24. Everybody knows you can trust information from a convicted felon
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you take her comments as sincere confusion then I have a bridge to sell you.
JonLeibowitz
Feb 2016
#18
How do you know what they've found? The CIA isn't about to say that embarassing material
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#20
Intelligence officials say some emails contained information that was classified at the time.
eomer
Feb 2016
#35
Thank you for taking the time and patience to respond to all the ridiculous posts regarding
politicaljunkie41910
Feb 2016
#58
National Security Archives @GWU are filled with documents that became classified AFTER they were
blm
Feb 2016
#3
C'mon, Major - I'm a Sanders' supporter, too, but, you know as well as I that this would NEVER
blm
Feb 2016
#53
He's a whistleblower who is being persecuted. That's enough credibility for me.
jhart3333
Feb 2016
#11
The point is that HRC was given special concideration because she is part of the Ruling Oligarchy.nm
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#22
Ah yes, the "no laws were broken" defense. But you actually don't know if laws were broken.
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#32
No - it's because it's a hit piece written to PRETEND it's important when it is NOT.
blm
Feb 2016
#50
Any federal employee of the 99% would be fired instantly for having done what she did. Do you
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#57
Since the FBI isn't investigating Powell or Rice, you assume they are innocent. Ok, how does that
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#60
Whether or not she acted in bad faith, I hope Democrats realize how all this will look in November.
forest444
Feb 2016
#10
Its ok, she will have super delegates in the general election to help her win, right?
GummyBearz
Feb 2016
#16
Just this last weekend I spoke with a relative that is a super conservative. He noticed my
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#33
There are no super delegates in the general. There are "Electors" in the "Electoral College".
Elmer S. E. Dump
Feb 2016
#47
Desperation to quote a man who intentionally leaked documents to a reporter to the SOS.
Justice
Feb 2016
#17
It is naive to think that your government is peachy clean. But it must make things so much
rhett o rick
Feb 2016
#36
Both Sec. Of State Clinton and Powell asked for their emails in question to be released.
Trust Buster
Feb 2016
#25
HRC has done everything possible to evade and delay release of her emails, including not
leveymg
Feb 2016
#27
what CIA documents did Stearling leak to the New York Times? How come he only got 3.5 years?
Sunlei
Feb 2016
#52
^ Btw, did anyone else sign those petitions sent to President Obama to free Mr. Sterling?
bobthedrummer
Feb 2016
#64