Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

forest444

(5,902 posts)
28. If she's the nominee, I hope you're right.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:12 PM
Feb 2016

Because as much as I agree with you that each of the above characters will do (or rather, try) precisely what you predict, the voters have a funny way of deciding what does or does not make someone unelectable.

My consolation would be that Trump isn't the psychopath we would get with Cruz, or the prostitute we would get with Narco Rubio. And it's common knowledge he doesn't believe most of what he's saying on his stump speeches.

Who knows? He might even make a halfway decent President - just like Hillary.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah, turning over classified documents to a news organization is giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #1
Better that the North Koreans and Chinese get them rather than the NYT? JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #2
Not even close. Hell they still haven't found anything that would be giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #5
You don't know what is in the e-mails she deleted. n/t JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #8
if they were just deleted & the drive not wiped they'd still be found. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #12
what, like with a cloth? JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #14
Seriously? My mom is 68 & was shocked to find out that you giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #15
If you take her comments as sincere confusion then I have a bridge to sell you. JonLeibowitz Feb 2016 #18
So she wasn't confused, she simply made a bad joke? OK, then. randome Feb 2016 #45
How do you know what they've found? The CIA isn't about to say that embarassing material rhett o rick Feb 2016 #20
Ahhhh, you're playing the what if game. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #30
Intelligence officials say some emails contained information that was classified at the time. eomer Feb 2016 #35
I love the comparison... beachbum bob Feb 2016 #26
+1 treestar Feb 2016 #48
Thank you for taking the time and patience to respond to all the ridiculous posts regarding politicaljunkie41910 Feb 2016 #58
National Security Archives @GWU are filled with documents that became classified AFTER they were blm Feb 2016 #3
Thank you. That's the sense I was getting, but couldn't confirm. Gregorian Feb 2016 #7
This is painful. I did ton of redacting & sending out for possible giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #13
FBI is not right wing. 840high Feb 2016 #39
Sez? blm Feb 2016 #54
"Donald Trump will drop out of the race by the end of September." Major Hogwash Feb 2016 #43
C'mon, Major - I'm a Sanders' supporter, too, but, you know as well as I that this would NEVER blm Feb 2016 #53
I still luv ya, man. Major Hogwash Feb 2016 #62
'asparagus' now THAT is a unifier. heheh….. blm Feb 2016 #63
Sterling's comments jibe with this article from The Intercept: Maedhros Feb 2016 #4
Why is this information coming from someone convicted of espionage? Gregorian Feb 2016 #6
He's a whistleblower who is being persecuted. That's enough credibility for me. jhart3333 Feb 2016 #11
The point is that HRC was given special concideration because she is part of the Ruling Oligarchy.nm rhett o rick Feb 2016 #22
No she wasn't, it was standard practice & no laws were broken. giftedgirl77 Feb 2016 #31
Ah yes, the "no laws were broken" defense. But you actually don't know if laws were broken. rhett o rick Feb 2016 #32
No - it's because it's a hit piece written to PRETEND it's important when it is NOT. blm Feb 2016 #50
Any federal employee of the 99% would be fired instantly for having done what she did. Do you rhett o rick Feb 2016 #57
I am a Sanders supporter - I also recognize propaganda when I see it. blm Feb 2016 #59
Would you prefer "anaoymous sources"? Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #46
How about Rice and Powell, were they given passes? Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #9
All conservatives are given passes, including Hillary harun Feb 2016 #51
FBI not investigating Powell or Rice. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #55
Since the FBI isn't investigating Powell or Rice, you assume they are innocent. Ok, how does that rhett o rick Feb 2016 #60
Read the specific post I responded to and you will find your answer. Kingofalldems Feb 2016 #61
Whether or not she acted in bad faith, I hope Democrats realize how all this will look in November. forest444 Feb 2016 #10
Its ok, she will have super delegates in the general election to help her win, right? GummyBearz Feb 2016 #16
It'll have to be an AWFUL lot to make up for the stampede to the GOP. forest444 Feb 2016 #19
Yea GummyBearz Feb 2016 #21
Just this last weekend I spoke with a relative that is a super conservative. He noticed my rhett o rick Feb 2016 #33
Two people in my bridge 840high Feb 2016 #40
There are no super delegates in the general. There are "Electors" in the "Electoral College". Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #47
Hillary will win easily this November Abouttime Feb 2016 #23
If she's the nominee, I hope you're right. forest444 Feb 2016 #28
LOL davidthegnome Feb 2016 #34
sounds possible.... wildbilln864 Feb 2016 #38
Desperation to quote a man who intentionally leaked documents to a reporter to the SOS. Justice Feb 2016 #17
Everybody knows you can trust information from a convicted felon GreydeeThos Feb 2016 #24
It is naive to think that your government is peachy clean. But it must make things so much rhett o rick Feb 2016 #36
Both Sec. Of State Clinton and Powell asked for their emails in question to be released. Trust Buster Feb 2016 #25
HRC has done everything possible to evade and delay release of her emails, including not leveymg Feb 2016 #27
If by "evade" you mean asking for their public release multiple times.... Trust Buster Feb 2016 #29
This thing is NEVER going anywhere. 6000eliot Feb 2016 #37
I'll wait till the FBI finishes 840high Feb 2016 #41
You are right....rich and powerful people never go to jail davidn3600 Feb 2016 #42
Republicans poisoned the well, I think Bradical79 Feb 2016 #44
David Tenenbaum got harsher penalties than Clinton noamnety Feb 2016 #49
what CIA documents did Stearling leak to the New York Times? How come he only got 3.5 years? Sunlei Feb 2016 #52
It appears that the dream of a Clinton indictment is fading Gothmog Feb 2016 #56
^ Btw, did anyone else sign those petitions sent to President Obama to free Mr. Sterling? bobthedrummer Feb 2016 #64
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CIA leaker: Clinton 'give...»Reply #28