Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Pretty obvious that they could arrest him. FBaggins Jun 2012 #1
Glad to know you support retaliatory arrests.... villager Jun 2012 #2
Odd... I missed where I said that. FBaggins Jun 2012 #4
I didn't. It was in your agreement with the verdict. If you read the SC's rationale for said verdict villager Jun 2012 #7
You mean the unanimous verdict? FBaggins Jun 2012 #10
Sadly, I also noted it was unanimous. villager Jun 2012 #13
Ginsburg and Breyer voted with the others so do you claim that they support retaliatory arrests? cstanleytech Jun 2012 #12
No surprise here Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #3
FACTS: elleng Jun 2012 #8
You pretty much confirm my point Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #11
+1 villager Jun 2012 #14
This matter is NOT ABOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, elleng Jun 2012 #18
No, Thomas made that clear Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #23
'One agent, elleng Jun 2012 #25
OK, now we have conflicting accounts Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #39
Yup, that confirms it Canuckistanian Jun 2012 #37
The probable cause was established before the arrest. NutmegYankee Jun 2012 #38
There should be know such thing Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #40
They did not. NutmegYankee Jun 2012 #45
Thomas deliberately ignored the fact Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #51
Your example lacks a hold on reality. NutmegYankee Jun 2012 #55
"allegedly pushed or touched him on the shoulder" ---which was it? wordpix Jun 2012 #27
If in fact he touched the VP, the 1st amendment does not protect it. Not even 24601 Jun 2012 #32
Right all around, 246. elleng Jun 2012 #35
If such an assault and/or battery occurred Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #41
No charges being filed doesnt mean they dont have grounds techincally for an arrest. cstanleytech Jun 2012 #15
This situation would not stink Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #24
The way I am reading (and I could be mistaken) cstanleytech Jun 2012 #28
Maybe, elleng Jun 2012 #31
Hmmmm Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #42
Wasnt that ruling based around the whole "they arent citizens so they have no rights" excuse? If so cstanleytech Jun 2012 #46
The assertion was made that we still have Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #50
Actually the court hasnt ruled on that aspect yet for US citizens if your refering to cstanleytech Jun 2012 #57
The USSS clearly had an opportunity and right Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #44
You can be arrested pretty easy already if a police officer is determined enough to do so the ruling cstanleytech Jun 2012 #47
But there was no "snap decision" Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #49
I dont recall it specifying the time though but thats not the point which was the court cstanleytech Jun 2012 #56
In a perfect world Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #5
Nah, in a perfect world he would never have been born. nt cstanleytech Jun 2012 #17
In a perfect world, lightning will strike Cheney's battery pack crunch60 Jun 2012 #29
This isnt a perfect world though :( nt cstanleytech Jun 2012 #30
Equating Cheney to Eichmann is somewhat ahistorical. Cheney is more akin to coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #21
I think Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #34
Well, I'm an opponent of capital punishment, even for the darkest of rodents, so coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #36
Sadly, I must agree with Kelvin Mace Jun 2012 #43
I'm not a fan of capital Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #52
Russ Feingold would have taken them on, as would Eliot Spitzer or Anthony Weiner. But the coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #54
Believe you misunderstand the authority of a VP. Not a deputy commander in 24601 Jun 2012 #33
Believe you misunderstand Sekhmets Daughter Jun 2012 #53
Eichmann was in charge of others. VPs have only their personal staffs. And the 24601 Jun 2012 #58
BAD headline from LATimes. elleng Jun 2012 #6
Listen carefully Can you hearing the Founding Father's scream from their graves at the outrageous lookingfortruth Jun 2012 #9
Guys like Cheney are above the law and Hubert Flottz Jun 2012 #16
Let's just face it this Deomcracy is a fraud. It has been the United States for the Corporations of lookingfortruth Jun 2012 #19
I disagree with the ruling, but very well bluestateguy Jun 2012 #20
It will be just as wrong then as it was in this case. But I know coalition_unwilling Jun 2012 #22
Its not the mouthing off that will land you into jail or atleast cstanleytech Jun 2012 #48
"he had bumped the vice president." Really? He "bumped" Cheney? What does that mean? wordpix Jun 2012 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court backs Secre...»Reply #17