Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

farleftlib

(2,125 posts)
Thu Feb 25, 2016, 03:42 PM Feb 2016

ACLU plans challenge to ruling finding no First Amendment right to film police [View all]

Source: Philadelphia Inquirer

Civil rights lawyers said Wednesday that they intend to appeal a federal court ruling in Philadelphia that citizens do not necessarily have a right protected by the First Amendment to record police activity.

In an opinion issued Friday, U.S. District Judge Mark A. Kearney wrote that unless a videographer announces the recording as an act of protest or a challenge to officers, police are free to stop it.

"While we instinctively understand the citizens' argument, particularly with rapidly developing instant image sharing technology, we find no basis to craft a new First Amendment right based solely on 'observing and recording' without expressive conduct," Kearney wrote.

But in an age of expanding surveillance - from instant cellphone photo sharing to increased use of police body cameras - the American Civil Liberties Union and its partners in the case were not alone in raising an eyebrow at Kearney's conclusions....

"Without a protected right to film officers, the ability of the public to monitor police activity is really reduced," said Mary Catherine Roper, one of the ACLU lawyers involved in the two cases on which Kearney ruled. "We know how effective video has been in creating a conversation about police accountability. Video does not always show police officers are misbehaving, but without it, it's really hard to convince people of misconduct by the authorities."
saying they "should reasonably anticipate and expect to be photographed, videotaped and/or audibly recorded by members of the general public."

Since then, the ACLU of Pennsylvania has led a group of civil rights lawyers in bringing cases involving civilians who were challenged or arrested while recording police carrying out their work.

In 2014, the group launched a social media initiative under the Twitter hashtag #PACopWatch to draw attention to officers who continued to ignore the Police Department's policy.



Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/news/20160225_ACLU_plans_challenge_to_ruling_finding_no_First_Amendment_right_to_film_police.html



Police have been seizing cell phones and recording devices and in one case locked a kid who was recording arrests in a police van. Scary stuff.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stupid judge. You can't be expressive without recording first. Video first, edit later. Duh. nt Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2016 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2016 #2
Public servants on public duties in public places have no privacy right or expectation of. Bernardo de La Paz Feb 2016 #3
Unfortunately farleftlib Feb 2016 #6
The Philly PD and civil liberties have always had a glancing acquaintance, at best friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #7
Post removed Post removed Feb 2016 #4
Good for the ACLU. n/t PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #5
I thought that this was settled already? blackspade Feb 2016 #8
I thought so too. Maybe it was a state level ruling or a decision in another circuit. I don't think okaawhatever Feb 2016 #15
"Hey, Mr. Officer with a gun, I just wanted to let you know, I'm recording you." thesquanderer Feb 2016 #9
This is bad, bad, news. Akicita Feb 2016 #10
It's an untenable position to argue that freedom of expression applies only in the moment Xipe Totec Feb 2016 #11
Agree with all that. Hassin Bin Sober Feb 2016 #17
Someone accused me today of never standing up for civil rights. randome Feb 2016 #12
Unfortunately this guy gabeana Feb 2016 #13
Those rights not... freebrew Feb 2016 #14
excellent opinion!! a lot smarter than that judge!! demigoddess Feb 2016 #16
IKR farleftlib Feb 2016 #18
What a stupid fucking judge. tabasco Feb 2016 #19
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»ACLU plans challenge to r...