Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Feds Release More Clinton Emails On Eve Of South Carolina Primary [View all]TM99
(8,352 posts)40. Indeed yes they would.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSKCN0QQ0BW20150821
And in previous batches, there were indeed classified at the time emails as well as ones that she had her staff purposefully remove the classified headers from.
So yes, if anyone else had done this type of behavior they would be arrested and tried on charges.
In the small fraction of emails made public so far, Reuters has found at least 30 email threads from 2009, representing scores of individual emails, that include what the State Department's own "Classified" stamps now identify as so-called 'foreign government information.' The U.S. government defines this as any information, written or spoken, provided in confidence to U.S. officials by their foreign counterparts.
This sort of information, which the department says Clinton both sent and received in her emails, is the only kind that must be "presumed" classified, in part to protect national security and the integrity of diplomatic interactions, according to U.S. regulations examined by Reuters.
"It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.
"If a foreign minister just told the secretary of state something in confidence, by U.S. rules that is classified at the moment it's in U.S. channels and U.S. possession," he said in a telephone interview, adding that for the State Department to say otherwise was "blowing smoke."
And in previous batches, there were indeed classified at the time emails as well as ones that she had her staff purposefully remove the classified headers from.
So yes, if anyone else had done this type of behavior they would be arrested and tried on charges.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The "Email" wasn't classified, but in many, the information within was classified at the time.
Yo_Mama
Feb 2016
#80
and how would you know that for a fact? YOU KNOW NOTHING. You didn't work for the agency,.
trueblue2007
Feb 2016
#14
because a general description of the type of content is right in the article.
magical thyme
Feb 2016
#17
They're going to be talking about prosecuting Hillary for the entire campaign.
Calista241
Feb 2016
#54
If so many people here are having a field day with it, why wouldn't the Republicans? People don't
24601
Feb 2016
#72
What difference does it make? You won't hear a word about this on CNN or Msnbc & definitely nowhere
jillan
Feb 2016
#7
train wreck ??? good job with the name calling there. takes one to know one.
trueblue2007
Feb 2016
#15
We would hear about it 24/7 in the fall if she was the Democratic nominee.
Major Hogwash
Feb 2016
#71