Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Feds Release More Clinton Emails On Eve Of South Carolina Primary [View all]Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)80. The "Email" wasn't classified, but in many, the information within was classified at the time.
According to the CIA, some of the emails closely paraphrased top secret documents. This story has been international for some time:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3462774/Spy-agencies-say-Clinton-emails-closely-matched-secret-documents-sources.html
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-emails-idUSMTZSAPEC2O2MGLXL
However, the agency reports found some emails included passages that closely tracked or mirrored communications marked "top secret," according to the sources, who all requested anonymity. In some cases, additional classification markings meant access was supposed to be limited to small groups of specially cleared officials.
Under the law and government rules, U.S. officials and contractors may not transmit any classified information - not only documents - outside secure, government-controlled channels. Such information should not be sent even through the government's .gov email network.
Under the law and government rules, U.S. officials and contractors may not transmit any classified information - not only documents - outside secure, government-controlled channels. Such information should not be sent even through the government's .gov email network.
Sadly, this Observer column is right:
http://observer.com/2016/02/breaking-hillary-clinton-put-spies-lives-at-risk/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
81 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The "Email" wasn't classified, but in many, the information within was classified at the time.
Yo_Mama
Feb 2016
#80
and how would you know that for a fact? YOU KNOW NOTHING. You didn't work for the agency,.
trueblue2007
Feb 2016
#14
because a general description of the type of content is right in the article.
magical thyme
Feb 2016
#17
They're going to be talking about prosecuting Hillary for the entire campaign.
Calista241
Feb 2016
#54
If so many people here are having a field day with it, why wouldn't the Republicans? People don't
24601
Feb 2016
#72
What difference does it make? You won't hear a word about this on CNN or Msnbc & definitely nowhere
jillan
Feb 2016
#7
train wreck ??? good job with the name calling there. takes one to know one.
trueblue2007
Feb 2016
#15
We would hear about it 24/7 in the fall if she was the Democratic nominee.
Major Hogwash
Feb 2016
#71