Latest Breaking News

yourpaljoey

(2,166 posts)

3. Clinton words is upside down world

Reply to Purveyor (Original post)

Tue Mar 1, 2016, 03:16 PM

Mar 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

109 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Clinton Chief Attacks State Dept. Watchdog [View all] Purveyor Mar 2016 OP

Ha ha ha ha ha! november3rd Mar 2016 #1

her fellow Dems aren't the only ones Clinton wants on the lamppost after her victory MisterP Mar 2016 #2

Clinton words is upside down world yourpaljoey Mar 2016 #3

Poor HRC, always a victim Press Virginia Mar 2016 #4

thats what worries me PatrynXX Mar 2016 #18

but but it isn't fair, she is fully vetted hollysmom Mar 2016 #76

Wow, that is rich, Darb Mar 2016 #84

What's "rich" about it? Press Virginia Mar 2016 #85

Seems to me, Darb Mar 2016 #86

What does Bill Clinton have to do with the OP? Press Virginia Mar 2016 #87

You mentioned "victim", I countered. Darb Mar 2016 #88

one need only look at her responses to Press Virginia Mar 2016 #89

Whatever you say. Darb Mar 2016 #90

Are the IG or FBI director right wing partisans? Press Virginia Mar 2016 #91

As institutions? No. Darb Mar 2016 #92

When did the State Dept become the home of RW Press Virginia Mar 2016 #94

Who said "State Department"? Darb Mar 2016 #95

I said Hillary plays the victim as a default position Press Virginia Mar 2016 #96

I don't see that at all. Darb Mar 2016 #99

Yes, they are both Obama appointees. Press Virginia Mar 2016 #101

Oh, it's two guys now. Total. Just two guys doing the investigation. Darb Mar 2016 #102

Ahhhh so when the FBI refers the matter to the DOJ recommending criminal charges Press Virginia Mar 2016 #103

They recommended criminal charges? What crime? Darb Mar 2016 #104

I said WHEN they do, not that they did Press Virginia Mar 2016 #105

What pesky emails? Darb Mar 2016 #106

ahhhhhh. So now Obama is part of the witch hunt. I wonder if he was paid off by the Stone Masons or Press Virginia Mar 2016 #107

Again with this? Darb Mar 2016 #108

You mean like HRC Claiming the whole investigation is a RW smear? Press Virginia Mar 2016 #109

They are shameless and disgusting. Hillary the victim..such a feminist! haikugal Mar 2016 #5

I half expect a claim that Obama is out to get her for '08. Spitfire of ATJ Mar 2016 #6

SMH Liberty Sage Mar 2016 #7

That reminds me of another story in the news BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #8

I hate statements like this: blackspade Mar 2016 #9

Not Partisan huh? Cordy Mar 2016 #44

This all could have been avoided if she had chosen to play by the rules she agreed to... TipTok Mar 2016 #47

exactly. MBS Mar 2016 #68

In soccer we call this an own goal nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #73

No facts are included in your post. blackspade Mar 2016 #57

Sounds like a legitimate complaint from a whistleblower vdogg Mar 2016 #10

Thank you for enlightening all of us. Some here only pretend to be Dems, they're actually right okaawhatever Mar 2016 #24

your statement reminds me of hopemountain Mar 2016 #81

LOL!! Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #98

Classic Clinton; attack the accuser in order to undermine their credibility... datguy_6 Mar 2016 #11

She's the real victim here... TipTok Mar 2016 #48

Jesus H Christ On A Barrel Of Pesticide... AzDar Mar 2016 #12

Must be some serious stuff going on that we don't know about yet. jalan48 Mar 2016 #13

Good point. BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #16

Yup!!! seaotter Mar 2016 #31

If you have not read on Watergate, nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #33

I was around for Watergate BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #36

I was not quite that old nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #38

Yeah, Mr. Integrity himself! Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #97

This reminds me of a strange place ... JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2016 #14

Really, so President Obama's choice for State OIG is "partisan" now? Lurks Often Mar 2016 #15

Perhaps you should read the article. The individual they're referring to isn't PBO's appointment. It okaawhatever Mar 2016 #27

Who should investigate, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz? BernieforPres2016 Mar 2016 #37

Snort. Good one. 840high Mar 2016 #78

. mmonk Mar 2016 #83

"Inspector General Steve Linick is �excessively deferential� to Emilia DiSanto" Lurks Often Mar 2016 #42

Senate approved OIG's are independent vdogg Mar 2016 #53

Wrong Lurks Often Mar 2016 #66

Good. And the so called progressives playing sufrommich Mar 2016 #17

And the moderate-right neo-liberals can go pound Mt. Rushmore. Elmer S. E. Dump Mar 2016 #100

To all those Democrats not behaving like Republicans, here's part of the article NOT highlighted Trust Buster Mar 2016 #19

And here is the other part furhter down you did not highlight nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #21

Grassley's plant has a political agenda. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #22

Of course they do nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #26

You misread the article. Grassley's plant and the Obama appointee are two different people. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #32

Nope I did not, nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #35

Which servers were hacked and who has died ? Trust Buster Mar 2016 #50

The clinton servers nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #51

Are you joking ? I thought you saw this as a serious issue ? Trust Buster Mar 2016 #52

Do you think I am jocking about the hack nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #54

The article said "attempted attack". Trust Buster Mar 2016 #60

There are actual hacks nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #61

I still see no evidence of a successful attack or murdered people. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #65

I know you do not, nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #67

Sure there was a hack or two or three. You just can't substantiate it. Good debate. Let's move on. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #69

I have and I also gave you the rest of the issues nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #70

So dramatic.....LOL...only time will tell. Enjoyed the debate just the same. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #71

I guess those of us who know history nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #72

It doesn't matter how it started. The question is how it will end. jillan Mar 2016 #25

You mean, how you and your crossed fingers hope it will end. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #28

I do not want a President Trump - get it?! My biggest fear is that Hillary will get the nom & jillan Mar 2016 #30

Be honest. If you had never heard of Hillay's emails, you'd still be attacking her on all fronts. Trust Buster Mar 2016 #34

To be honest when I read one of the emails from the FOIA room nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #40

Damn straight I'd be attacking her CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #43

If Hillary gets elected POTUS, she will be impeached. Bet on it. Ikonoklast Mar 2016 #46

I think they are looking at an indinctment BEFORE the convension nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #55

yes, I would wager the draft for the impeachment papers is already drawn. grasswire Mar 2016 #58

The political window is far shorter than that nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #62

Keep your head in the sand all you want. That is not going to make this go away. jillan Mar 2016 #45

It's her fault for having such a laundry list of issues... TipTok Mar 2016 #49

There is only one way I can read this nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #20

I just want it to break sooner rather than later. nt grasswire Mar 2016 #59

"the office has grown increasingly partisan , accusing it of having an �anti-Clinton" bias" jillan Mar 2016 #23

The set up begins. seaotter Mar 2016 #29

Such hubris...and the problem is everyone but HER CoffeeCat Mar 2016 #39

I think they are nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #41

Woe is her... conspiracies all around. revbones Mar 2016 #56

Two federal judges, the IC AG, the FBI, and the DOS IG all agree. HRC is in trouble. leveymg Mar 2016 #63

Well on the bright side nadinbrzezinski Mar 2016 #64

Clinton didn't have any problems with the OIG Angel Martin Mar 2016 #74

Clinton is worse than Nixon. 840high Mar 2016 #79

Podesta? SLIME bag! SoapBox Mar 2016 #75

Hope he's messing his pants. 840high Mar 2016 #80

One does not get far... dchill Mar 2016 #77

So Podesta lashes out at perceived threat. HereSince1628 Mar 2016 #82

Witch Hunt. Darb Mar 2016 #93