Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Clinton Chief Attacks State Dept. Watchdog [View all]TipTok
(2,474 posts)47. This all could have been avoided if she had chosen to play by the rules she agreed to...
... when she took office.
She has no one to blame but herself.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
her fellow Dems aren't the only ones Clinton wants on the lamppost after her victory
MisterP
Mar 2016
#2
Ahhhh so when the FBI refers the matter to the DOJ recommending criminal charges
Press Virginia
Mar 2016
#103
ahhhhhh. So now Obama is part of the witch hunt. I wonder if he was paid off by the Stone Masons or
Press Virginia
Mar 2016
#107
This all could have been avoided if she had chosen to play by the rules she agreed to...
TipTok
Mar 2016
#47
Thank you for enlightening all of us. Some here only pretend to be Dems, they're actually right
okaawhatever
Mar 2016
#24
Classic Clinton; attack the accuser in order to undermine their credibility...
datguy_6
Mar 2016
#11
Perhaps you should read the article. The individual they're referring to isn't PBO's appointment. It
okaawhatever
Mar 2016
#27
"Inspector General Steve Linick is “excessively deferential” to Emilia DiSanto"
Lurks Often
Mar 2016
#42
To all those Democrats not behaving like Republicans, here's part of the article NOT highlighted
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#19
You misread the article. Grassley's plant and the Obama appointee are two different people.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#32
Sure there was a hack or two or three. You just can't substantiate it. Good debate. Let's move on.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#69
So dramatic.....LOL...only time will tell. Enjoyed the debate just the same.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#71
I do not want a President Trump - get it?! My biggest fear is that Hillary will get the nom &
jillan
Mar 2016
#30
Be honest. If you had never heard of Hillay's emails, you'd still be attacking her on all fronts.
Trust Buster
Mar 2016
#34
Keep your head in the sand all you want. That is not going to make this go away.
jillan
Mar 2016
#45
"the office has grown increasingly partisan , accusing it of having an “anti-Clinton" bias"
jillan
Mar 2016
#23
Two federal judges, the IC AG, the FBI, and the DOS IG all agree. HRC is in trouble.
leveymg
Mar 2016
#63