Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
27. Truth.
Wed Mar 16, 2016, 08:43 PM
Mar 2016

I should have explained better.

The scenario I have been focused on is the opposite of this: steal the nomination from Trump and then quietly support him as a third party candidate so that he can take EVs from Mrs. Clinton, the object being to toss the election to the House. Then, to protect themselves, the House won't vote, and the Speaker of the House (presumably Paul Ryan) assumes the office in January, 2016.

But if Trump wins the nomination and they can't or won't steal it from him, then the object is to help Trump win in places like NJ, PA, NY, CT, but to use the 3rd party conservative to snap up the flyover states so that Trump can't win, either.

The end result is functionally the same: Paul Ryan becomes the default, unelected President, and no Republican in Congress is to blame.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There's such a thing as " conservative convener?" Who knew? Glorfindel Mar 2016 #1
a wonderful idea... dhill926 Mar 2016 #2
Yeah, Really. Please Proceed. TheOther95Percent Mar 2016 #3
. geomon666 Mar 2016 #4
The Japanese tried this kind of thing @ the end of WW II Botany Mar 2016 #5
And who is the "true conservative" they will select?? OldRedneck Mar 2016 #6
I for one hope they choose Sarah Palin. Turborama Mar 2016 #9
Too little, too late susanr516 Mar 2016 #7
This is just the break the Romney/Ryan campaign has The Second Stone Mar 2016 #10
You may be correct susanr516 Mar 2016 #12
I was serious and joking The Second Stone Mar 2016 #13
With enough money, they could do it. Jim Lane Mar 2016 #25
Trump's the future of the Republican Party as the political spectrum continues going right. jalan48 Mar 2016 #8
and as said in MSNBS a few minutes ago elmac Mar 2016 #11
That guy must not know election law. former9thward Mar 2016 #28
I see opportunity...not where you think. hay rick Mar 2016 #14
Yep, my thought exactly! lark Mar 2016 #22
Big Points for the Montgomery Burns portrait! NBachers Mar 2016 #15
and so the sundering begins 0rganism Mar 2016 #16
We need to pay attention to this. sofa king Mar 2016 #17
A 'true conservative' would be unlikely to take a state from Hillary, rather than from Trump muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #21
Truth. sofa king Mar 2016 #27
Hillary would likely win some traditional red states under this scenario. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #24
Abandon ship Republicans, abandon ship! Sunlei Mar 2016 #18
Maybe there should be two "third party" movements. TryLogic Mar 2016 #19
Don't know the others, but Erickson is a buffoon, so I expect nothing will come of it muriel_volestrangler Mar 2016 #20
If anything comes of it it will not be because of Erickson. yellowcanine Mar 2016 #23
Robert Costa just said they are looking at Ben Sasse wheniwasincongress Mar 2016 #26
When your enemy is drowning... JHB Mar 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Top conservatives gather ...»Reply #27