Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama Privately Tells Donors That Time Is Coming to Unite Behind Hillary Clinton [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)118. My point is, that they didn't want to make her path easy ahead of the 5 state primary contests.
They love a horse race, because a horse race sells papers. They do enjoy lifting candidates up, only to slam them down--I guess they think this proves their lack of bias, or something.
That said, I completely agree with both your observations about how they treat the GOP, as well as this portion of your link:
Update: A number of readers have made a point that I should have made earlier. The Sanders article was not a breaking news story, but rather a look back at his legislative record. Given its sensitivity and importance (it ended up on the front page on the morning of major primaries), why didnt senior editors vet the story and make all the editing changes before it went online? Digital platforms, after all, are not a test run, and non-urgent stories dont need to be pushed out as quickly as this one apparently was. I would also observe that the context added here looked a lot like plain-old opinion to this reader, and quite a few others.
They are so eager for "content" that they slap it up without talking about it first. I do think online material should be corrected for things like spelling, reporter error, or a change in what were previously believed to be "facts," but tone-shading? That needs to be established at the git-go--and frankly, the "tone" in the best publications is as neutral as possible.
I was hearing "lowered expectations" for IL long before Friday, but I do try to keep my ear to the ground. I go to 538 when I want to see things that cheer me up, but after MI I don't put all my eggs in their basket (!) -- they are only as good as the polls, which, as we've learned, ain't always 'en pointe!'
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
183 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama Privately Tells Donors That Time Is Coming to Unite Behind Hillary Clinton [View all]
Freddie Stubbs
Mar 2016
OP
and nominating middle of the road (with unknown women's reproductive health rights positions)
bbgrunt
Mar 2016
#76
I understand his point, that authenticity doesn't automatically make you a good chief executive.
thesquanderer
Mar 2016
#150
Yeah I noticed that also but then I asked my neighbor and he said it happened that way!
yellowcanine
Mar 2016
#63
My sister-in-law's hairdresser's cousin's next-door neighbor confirmed it, too.
ColesCountyDem
Mar 2016
#115
You know the NYT is pathetic, now I'm completely jaded with these rags NYT, WPO, etc.
YOHABLO
Mar 2016
#159
Corporate America and governments —at all levels — hate them more than you do,
SusanaMontana41
Mar 2016
#170
Exactly. Why waste time with justice, when you only need the appearance of justice.
Baitball Blogger
Mar 2016
#165
the caucuses are not the "popular vote" or are you trying to say an apple is an orange?
CreekDog
Mar 2016
#174
Aaaaaaand... Bernie shouldn't end his campaign until the June 7th primaries either
scheming daemons
Mar 2016
#181
Yes, this was after Michigan, and BEFORE anyone knew how this Tuesday was going to turn out.
thesquanderer
Mar 2016
#26
I think they didn't want to publish anything helpful to Clinton, so they held it.
MADem
Mar 2016
#97
I don't think they have an aversion to publishing things that are helpful to Clinton.
thesquanderer
Mar 2016
#109
My point is, that they didn't want to make her path easy ahead of the 5 state primary contests.
MADem
Mar 2016
#118
Says the guy who was in the same position this time in 2008 as Bernie Sanders is in now. O,
Gene Debs
Mar 2016
#16
that is precisely false, he was in the position Clinton is in now, leading in pledged delegates
geek tragedy
Mar 2016
#103
"But he played down the importance of authenticity" - yeah because voters never respond to THAT.
phantom power
Mar 2016
#30
NYT that had to do a correction on a Bernie story that they published and then edited...
KoKo
Mar 2016
#137
I'm Thinking That During And After The Bush Presidency That The American People......
global1
Mar 2016
#44
Time to call the WH to make sure Obama does not start pushing that filth about Nancy and Ron.
Bluenorthwest
Mar 2016
#60
Obama addressed a fund raising dinner of Texas millionaires. Only $33,400 a ticket for the meal.
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#73
They don't need you. They have Wall Street and big business running the show.
imagine2015
Mar 2016
#163
There's been a rule change that will make it easier for you to express yourself.
MADem
Mar 2016
#133
Oh yes, I got locked out of the hillary group for saying IMO clinton wasn't the best
ladjf
Mar 2016
#140
I got locked out of the Sanders group for giving people a link to a CNN video that showed
MADem
Mar 2016
#148
I hope it will be part of the post-primary tweaks the admins make, to stop putting that stuff
MADem
Mar 2016
#153
It seems pretty likely those Texas millionaires were already united for Clinton.
surrealAmerican
Mar 2016
#96
With half the delegates still to be determined and donations pouring in to Bernie?
Lydia Leftcoast
Mar 2016
#143
Sanders is nearing the point where his campaign against Hillary Clinton will come to an end?
magical thyme
Mar 2016
#145