Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

yes, getting more support is a bad thing. MariaThinks Mar 2016 #1
If she's getting dubious support for shitty policy postitons, then it is a bad thing. Chakab Mar 2016 #27
yeah the Brussels one was pretty bad PatrynXX Mar 2016 #39
Gosh, so Republicans like Hillary's Foreign Policy Positions? elljay Mar 2016 #2
They actually like a lot of her positions. The Republicons are figuring out she would rhett o rick Mar 2016 #7
Well said. zentrum Mar 2016 #28
She'll "get things done" farleftlib Mar 2016 #59
Only the more moderate ones of which there are fewer now than 20+ years ago and only cstanleytech Mar 2016 #17
Gee, and when I posted yesterday that Hillary was a hawk iwillalwayswonderwhy Mar 2016 #19
Even Chris Matthews elljay Mar 2016 #45
This makes no sense whatthehey Mar 2016 #58
yes, her foreign policy is the same as the republicans Viva_La_Revolution Mar 2016 #3
Birds of a feather AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #4
"You are not responsible for what your friends do, mac56 Mar 2016 #5
She is an adopted Bush family member anyway. It's beginning to look a lot like the fix is in Doctor_J Mar 2016 #6
And when the Republicons privatize SS for our national defense, she will sign the bill rhett o rick Mar 2016 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Mar 2016 #24
The Guantanamo issue is not a valid camparator. potone Mar 2016 #43
That sounds like a rationalization. When he first took office he had the backing he needed but he rhett o rick Mar 2016 #44
But remember what his first months in office were like. potone Mar 2016 #46
Until we revolt and remove the cancer. TowneshipRebellion Mar 2016 #13
The Clinton Aristocracy better heed what Machiavelli warned. Don't leave your rhett o rick Mar 2016 #31
SHARK JUMP! Darb Mar 2016 #57
Well if that isn't confirmation of what so many of us have been saying... SoapBox Mar 2016 #9
What you are missing here passiveporcupine Mar 2016 #26
With respect I disagree. The best I have been able to find out about how her supporters rhett o rick Mar 2016 #32
I wouldn't doubt if KKKarl Rove is working for her LiberalLovinLug Mar 2016 #10
I second that observation. nm rhett o rick Mar 2016 #33
Oh please people, get a grip. Beacool Mar 2016 #11
So let me see Andy823 Mar 2016 #15
I only can respond for what I have said. Beacool Mar 2016 #16
When exactly mac56 Mar 2016 #66
Wish I could believe you but... mreilly Mar 2016 #21
I have anecdotal evidence that you are correct. darkwing Mar 2016 #23
I think we've had our fill of demonstrations of republican intelligence regarding foreign policy Scootaloo Mar 2016 #30
Shall I give you the list of all the issues that she agrees with them on? Let's start with rhett o rick Mar 2016 #35
Just to be fair... GummyBearz Mar 2016 #54
This is her big position and vision. The fear of a Trump presidency and how he would be worse. EndElectoral Mar 2016 #40
We can kill our way through any problem JEB Mar 2016 #12
Well people had a choice Geronimoe Mar 2016 #14
I support the TPP but darkwing Mar 2016 #25
Bernie supporters are not opposed to trade zalinda Mar 2016 #37
According to Obama this trade deal IS fair darkwing Mar 2016 #47
Why don't you read some experts from it? Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #49
NAFTA has been good overall darkwing Mar 2016 #53
It gutted jobs away from hard working people. mariawr Mar 2016 #55
Mexicans are hard working people darkwing Mar 2016 #60
*for the top 1% GummyBearz Mar 2016 #56
Lower prices benefit everyone. darkwing Mar 2016 #61
Products got cheaper to make using cheap, exploitive labor in mexico GummyBearz Mar 2016 #62
With regard to "lower pricing" Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #63
I guess thats where we'll disagree darkwing Mar 2016 #64
There are numerous studies that contradict this online... Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #65
Neocon Birds of a feather n/t n2doc Mar 2016 #18
Now there's a ringing endorsement! KPN Mar 2016 #20
Because it isn't about Left v. Right... It's about The Corporate/Establishment v. EVERYONE ELSE. AzDar Mar 2016 #22
warmongers gotta stick together stupidicus Mar 2016 #29
This is about Trump. Bad Dog Mar 2016 #34
Does anybody here think Trump would be better than Clinton on foreign policy? mathematic Mar 2016 #36
Of Course. Clinton and Darth Cheney want the very same things Lorien Mar 2016 #38
We're 3 Trillion is debt for the war in Iraq. Soldiers that came home with all > YOHABLO Mar 2016 #41
You'd have to be a moron libodem Mar 2016 #42
Clausewitz would be proud. sofa king Mar 2016 #48
I see more similarities between Trump and Hillary, as opposed to differe Avalon Sparks Mar 2016 #50
Two words: Robert Kagan Scuba Mar 2016 #51
... and that tells ya' all you need to know. Myrina Mar 2016 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Consider Clinton,' forme...»Reply #12