Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders Lays Out His Requirements For Endorsing Hillary Clinton [View all]stopbush
(24,808 posts)169. Since when do losers get to dictate terms?
And Sanders is a LOSER.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
307 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders Lays Out His Requirements For Endorsing Hillary Clinton [View all]
man of few w
Mar 2016
OP
And many half-wits said Obama looked like the Messiah. Six of one, half a dozen of the other.
LanternWaste
Mar 2016
#76
Well, that renowned humanitarian Henry Kissinger DID refer to the poor as 'useless eaters.'
PatrickforO
Mar 2016
#229
I'll give the republicans that at least they rejected royal family Bush.
hollowdweller
Mar 2016
#216
Stop the partisan bicker, please. This is the primary and no violations have been posted here yet.
marble falls
Mar 2016
#68
The establishment is. And they are less likely than I to even entertain the idea.
bravenak
Mar 2016
#50
Giving in to him would set a bad precedent and anger many of us democrats who have been here
bravenak
Mar 2016
#60
As you will get used to the fact that the losing party gets no power over policy or direction
bravenak
Mar 2016
#63
This whole sub-thread appears to be you saying that the establishment party should not
Bohunk68
Mar 2016
#96
I am saying that the losing party does not get to make a list of demands and get them met
bravenak
Mar 2016
#99
That is not what I am hearing from him. I know full well what the Rethuglicans have in store.
Bohunk68
Mar 2016
#163
re: "the losing party gets no power over policy or direction" - not true. See Jesse Jackson.
thesquanderer
Mar 2016
#136
The Democrats will have a working majority once Clinton and a number of new congressional candidates
George II
Mar 2016
#234
A loser with 10% doesn't get to add much, but a candidate with 45%+ support should have some input..
marble falls
Mar 2016
#71
After forty or so years in elected office??? He'll join. He knows how to play well with others on...
marble falls
Mar 2016
#119
Absolutely, she has changed some huge positions, thats why I have no problem voting for her....
marble falls
Mar 2016
#131
We're going to make it through the primaries and no matter who wins: we win and the Tea/GOP loses.
marble falls
Mar 2016
#181
And if Bernie manages to get the nom, which I seriously hope he does, we will be seeing them again.
GoneOffShore
Mar 2016
#185
Just fyi: telling Democrats NOT to vote doesn't set well with most DUers here...
FailureToCommunicate
Mar 2016
#165
In case you weren't reading clearly, I replied to the poster's threat not to vote.
Darb
Mar 2016
#270
Show me a movement on the internet in the past on the left that have so many articles
bravenak
Mar 2016
#89
My first vote for for L.B.J. --- You want to know why Benie should remake the party?
Hoppy
Mar 2016
#27
Yeah, because "true" liberals oppose same-sex marriage, support horrid free-trade agreements,
Roland99
Mar 2016
#173
He didn't "become" a Democrat. He re-upped in VT for next election as a "I"
KittyWampus
Mar 2016
#243
...because he represents what most of us want and DLCers changed our party to what we DON'T want
yurbud
Mar 2016
#283
New LBN Threads! New LBN Threads! Quick! Anything! GET IT OFF THE FRONT PAGE!
man of few w
Mar 2016
#13
The DNC, IMO, would pretty much beg Bernie to endorse Hillary, in the hopes that all of his
djean111
Mar 2016
#32
Some good points, but Sanders leads Clinton by 36% among Independents.
debunction.junction
Mar 2016
#69
I think that we will have to disagree as to the positioning of independents,
TexasTowelie
Mar 2016
#197
I don't think these are all ultimatums. It would be the starting point of a negotiation.
thesquanderer
Mar 2016
#226
He was welcomed as a Democrat by the DNC so that he would not run as an Independent.
djean111
Mar 2016
#33
The Sanders movement has the standing of the millions of votes we have so far won
Ken Burch
Mar 2016
#39
Hopefully whichever candidate wins will get the support of all other Democratic candidates
Democat
Mar 2016
#31
When has any loser been afforded the ability to dictate the terms of their surrender?
Loki
Mar 2016
#54
Sanders calmly answered tht question of what it would take for his supporters to support Clinton. NT
Eric J in MN
Mar 2016
#195
So he admits he can't win, and only hopes to influence the party platform.
Agnosticsherbet
Mar 2016
#116
I'm surprised he didn't demand that she and the DNC rid themselves of DWS.
Chicago1980
Mar 2016
#172
This campaign has made me understand I'm NOT a Clinton Democrat, maybe not a Democrat at all
Dems to Win
Mar 2016
#187
With all due respect to HuffPost, these are not requirements, this is a wish list
beastie boy
Mar 2016
#190
clearly the polarized argument here is what the Democratic Party as a whole has to deal with
cloudythescribbler
Mar 2016
#207
I am wondering what he is going to do after the general when he goes back to being a Senator.
upaloopa
Mar 2016
#232
He could well be a Senator without any Committee Chairs if he doesn't stump for the winner.
KittyWampus
Mar 2016
#244
Sure. You can bet Hillary will co-opt most if not all of Bernie's proposals.
forest444
Mar 2016
#228
VPs don't really do much. That would be a waste of his talent and wouldn't guarantee that
liberal_at_heart
Mar 2016
#302
Mrs. Clinton has to do what I say if she wants my endorsement - Bernie Sanders
MadamX2016
Mar 2016
#253