Latest Breaking News

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)

39. And this is going to be her excuse?

Reply to w4rma (Original post)

Fri Mar 25, 2016, 08:03 PM

Mar 2016

Puleaze.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

123 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Records show Clinton received just one training brief on classified info [View all] w4rma Mar 2016 OP

Offs please don't even try to say she didn't know. onecaliberal Mar 2016 #1

She knew, and she signed a security agreement that day where the penalties were laid out. Linked leveymg Mar 2016 #13

Not only did she know AgerolanAmerican Mar 2016 #38

As a Private in the US Army I had to sign off on that breifing FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #79

Yes, so you know what would happen to you if you ran classified info on your own server leveymg Mar 2016 #84

Special Treatment for Hillary FreakinDJ Mar 2016 #85

But, isn't she the one who can "work with the other side?" leveymg Mar 2016 #87

If she's claiming to be the most ready for the Oval Office, Jarqui Mar 2016 #2

She's not using lack of training as an excuse. She has nothing to excuse. pnwmom Mar 2016 #4

Sorry, no -- there are standards... she doesn't get to make them up at her own whim. JudyM Mar 2016 #14

By law, the agency head gets to ESTABLISH standards for his or her own agency. pnwmom Mar 2016 #15

By law, there are standard definitions - she can adjust particulars, but the idea that she can say JudyM Mar 2016 #17

She never sent classified documents through her server. She used the classified system pnwmom Mar 2016 #18

If she always used it, we wouldn't know she relied on Sid Blumenthal cprise Mar 2016 #63

I do not agree with this whatsoever Jarqui Mar 2016 #25

The SoS was supposed to send classified email on the separate, classified system. pnwmom Mar 2016 #27

Ok, please produce Hillary's .gov email address that received these Jarqui Mar 2016 #37

You want me to produce her CLASSIFIED address? pnwmom Mar 2016 #42

Nope. What I am citing was an exchange of testimony in the House Jarqui Mar 2016 #44

^^ BOOM ^^ revbones Mar 2016 #55

Bookmarking this - TY! n/t ebayfool Mar 2016 #82

Nothing will ever come of any of this. Nothing. Laser102 Mar 2016 #57

I'm suspect CIA Director Deutsch and General Petraeus felt similarly or they Jarqui Mar 2016 #64

FREE BEACON? Really? MADem Mar 2016 #9

Sorry, I simply do not subscribe to shoot the messenger. I never will. Jarqui Mar 2016 #21

Well, maybe you should follow the idea of MADem Mar 2016 #22

Once again, you're wrong. Jarqui Mar 2016 #35

No, I'm not. You were looking for anything to "prove" your assertion. MADem Mar 2016 #36

Here's a problem with this reasoning: Jarqui Mar 2016 #43

That is party-hack logic cprise Mar 2016 #54

His two links said the same thing--the 2nd one was from the wingnut server. MADem Mar 2016 #56

Finding a govt document on Google is 'the company you keep' cprise Mar 2016 #58

When you have a choice of sources and you "choose" Free Beacon my thought is that this is where MADem Mar 2016 #60

She wasn't some "senior staffer" -- she was agency head. As such, Federal law makes her pnwmom Mar 2016 #3

This is the absolute truth. She is the most senior cabinet official. MADem Mar 2016 #10

But much of the really sensitive classified material found did not originate at State Yo_Mama Mar 2016 #47

grasping for the life preserver rtracey Mar 2016 #5

If this is true that . . Major Hogwash Mar 2016 #6

Why? She was the head of the agency. She was the one who determined pnwmom Mar 2016 #8

Classified info arises from any departments, and she had to follow rules on that info Yo_Mama Mar 2016 #48

Right. And handling that is simple, too. Classified documents from other departments pnwmom Mar 2016 #49

What is the "classified system" you refer to? snagglepuss Mar 2016 #80

L. O. L~! MADem Mar 2016 #7

I had to do it annually as a lowly government contractor. bluedigger Mar 2016 #11

Right. Because you were a lowly govt. contractor. She was the Agency Head, pnwmom Mar 2016 #19

A good leader doesn't ask their subordinates to do anything they aren't willing to do. bluedigger Mar 2016 #20

Nonsense. She had some duties that were HERS and not theirs. pnwmom Mar 2016 #50

ONLY FOR THEIR OWN INFORMATION. Get it? Yo_Mama Mar 2016 #52

Prove that with something other than RW hysteria based on rumors pnwmom Mar 2016 #53

And if you were a lowly enlisted member of the military, or even a senior officer, MADem Mar 2016 #23

Ohhhh NO,,, EMAILS,,,,, Oh the horror of it all!,,Drink! Cryptoad Mar 2016 #12

What a bullshit story man of few w Mar 2016 #26

I think she had security clearance as a senator too, so MGKrebs Mar 2016 #16

She got a classified material control brief as FLOTUS, too. MADem Mar 2016 #24

This is a GOP story, period. This story exists to destroy Hillary, period. Jackie Wilson Said Mar 2016 #28

Of COURSE it is--that's why the "proof" comes from The FREE BEACON. MADem Mar 2016 #61

But....She's so experienced monicaangela Mar 2016 #29

She's way more experienced than Bernie, for goddamned sure. Darb Mar 2016 #31

Bwahahahahahahahahaha monicaangela Mar 2016 #32

Lots of people laugh at the truth. Darb Mar 2016 #40

Experience? monicaangela Mar 2016 #65

She is more expeerienced. Happy? Darb Mar 2016 #66

LOL! monicaangela Mar 2016 #67

He a nobody, period. Darb Mar 2016 #70

And yet he's giving the person monicaangela Mar 2016 #72

He's getting beat soundly, except in Darb Mar 2016 #74

Okay Darb monicaangela Mar 2016 #76

Have a nice day. Darb Mar 2016 #77

I'm trying to think of someone else who served in the Senate and went on MGKrebs Mar 2016 #98

And there you go with the Darb Mar 2016 #71

My points are my points monicaangela Mar 2016 #73

Whatever you say. Darb Mar 2016 #75

I think it is more appropriate Fairgo Mar 2016 #101

I trust Bernie. Hillary - not at all. 840high Mar 2016 #45

Good for you. Darb Mar 2016 #59

This ought to rile up the teabaggers. Darb Mar 2016 #30

it's sad to see dems salivating over the hounding of the dem front runner saturnsring Mar 2016 #33

Good grief. She didn't know better? farleftlib Mar 2016 #34

And this is going to be her excuse? SoapBox Mar 2016 #39

She was a lawyer, and had been first lady and a senator. She KNEW her emails were public Zira Mar 2016 #41

.+1 840high Mar 2016 #46

She was a lawyer and knew the law. So did Obama's Department of Justice pnwmom Mar 2016 #51

+1,000! nt MADem Mar 2016 #62

Correct creon Mar 2016 #68

The USDOJ has made no such determination. That's an Oped from last September. leveymg Mar 2016 #99

There were no laws broken. creon Mar 2016 #69

Not so sure about that... MGKrebs Mar 2016 #100

makes sense. creon Mar 2016 #122

Seems we spend way too much time hearing that said about the Clintons. n/t winter is coming Mar 2016 #107

That is as may be creon Mar 2016 #121

As the article said-this is sure to be red meat for her critics. YUP--the Sanders riversedge Mar 2016 #78

What this says to me is that compliance with the Department's own rules was unimportant to her. JudyM Mar 2016 #81

President Obama knew and didn't object. pnwmom Mar 2016 #86

Obama didn't ok it - he just gave her enough rope to hang herself. leveymg Mar 2016 #88

Obama repeatedly said her use of the server did not pose a national security problem. pnwmom Mar 2016 #89

That was before 1/22 when the FBI confirmed there were TS/SAP classified materials on the server leveymg Mar 2016 #90

The FBI has never confirmed there were documents classified AT THAT TIME pnwmom Mar 2016 #91

There are no TS/SAP documents on the server - the information was stripped out of other agency docs leveymg Mar 2016 #93

You are quoting from a hit piece by a guy who calls Liz Warren "Fauxcahauntus." pnwmom Mar 2016 #94

No, you are misinformed. the source for that is CBS News leveymg Mar 2016 #95

And, if you don't like CBS News, here's the 1/9/16 report in The NYT leveymg Mar 2016 #96

As the State Department Head, Hillary had the authority pnwmom Mar 2016 #103

That is simply one example of many how classified docs "bleed" leveymg Mar 2016 #108

There was no law that required she use her .gov account for non-classified govt. emails. pnwmom Mar 2016 #114

That was a DOS regulation that changed. It has been a crime since 1917 to mishandle leveymg Mar 2016 #116

She didn't mishandle it, unlike Colin Powell who destroyed millions of emails. pnwmom Mar 2016 #118

So you are disavowing your own post? This is the one I was responding to: pnwmom Mar 2016 #102

I don't know what you're getting at, but you"re full of shit. leveymg Mar 2016 #109

Are you having trouble reading your own post, displaying the writings pnwmom Mar 2016 #119

Ignorantia juris non excusat LiberalElite Mar 2016 #83

The Justice Department said she didn't violate the law. n/t pnwmom Mar 2016 #92

Link? Or are you just posting falsies today. leveymg Mar 2016 #97

You're the one who specializes in posting RW falsies. pnwmom Mar 2016 #104

That's a falsie from last Sept. Kinda hoped you had fresh leveymg Mar 2016 #105

See my response earlier. Nothing has changed. There is still nothing pnwmom Mar 2016 #106

You can hold your breath and stamp your feet all you want. leveymg Mar 2016 #110

You can post Rethug rumors all you want. It doesn't matter where you get this stuff, pnwmom Mar 2016 #111

There has to be a germ of truth for disinformation to work. Yours are completely leveymg Mar 2016 #112

Disinformation doesn't require a germ of truth. For example, the Salem Witch trials. pnwmom Mar 2016 #113

The Salem Witch trials wasn't disinformation. It was mass hysteria. leveymg Mar 2016 #115

The Salem Witch trials was disinformation promoting mass hysteria, pnwmom Mar 2016 #117

But EXPERIENCE. dchill Mar 2016 #120

Apparently Hillary's securuty training didn't take. cpwm17 Mar 2016 #123