Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

musiclawyer

(2,335 posts)
20. This is a CBA leverage /shaming exercise
Thu Mar 31, 2016, 06:54 PM
Mar 2016

It's not about winning an EEOC case. Why? Because it's apples v oranges. Yes the women on the USWNT are underpaid by the Federation. It's their main income. Income from club ball is peanuts or nothing at all

By contrast the men on the USMNT get paid, usually via bonus, for being called up to the team. There are incentives for winning But the men all get paid their main income by their clubs NOT from national team duty

It's apples and oranges . The tv revenue and overall income generate by the USWNT is relevant only in showing the "degree" to which the ladies deserve more income from the Federation.

You don't see the ladies saying they are underpaid for playing on their clubs. That's truly an apples to apples comparison. But they won't do that because it's risible in that the highest tier womens' club teams either make zero money, or barely break even. The highest tier men's club teams making exponentially more money and revenue from different sources and can thus afford to pay higher salaries.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Leverage in the CBA negotiations Depaysement Mar 2016 #1
If pay was performance based the women's team should be paid more MowCowWhoHow III Mar 2016 #2
Exactly! n/t n2doc Mar 2016 #3
so very very true dembotoz Mar 2016 #4
I heard about this morning. My first thought was they don't generate the same ad/licensing revenue.. Roland99 Mar 2016 #8
They had the world cup in 2015. The men did not. Travis_0004 Mar 2016 #15
I believe your statement is correct. Bob41213 Apr 2016 #26
It's not about performance on the field NobodyHere Mar 2016 #14
It's about the women working just as hard as the men and DESERVE EQUAL PAY! Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #18
Sports doesn't work that way davidn3600 Mar 2016 #19
Yup. It's about time women get the same pay for the same amount of work. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #21
But that's the thing, they want equal pay for LESS work davidn3600 Mar 2016 #22
Equal pay for equal work, per game. That is fair. Dont call me Shirley Mar 2016 #25
That's not how the real world works. Ace Rothstein Apr 2016 #27
"That's not how the real world works"... Dont call me Shirley Apr 2016 #28
Surely you can't be serious NobodyHere Mar 2016 #23
The US has the absolute best women's soccer team in world history Recursion Mar 2016 #5
Define "carry" fbc Mar 2016 #7
This doesn't sound like the whole story to me. fbc Mar 2016 #6
Then why not make the salaries dependent upon revenues generated and if there's a World Cup or not? Roland99 Mar 2016 #10
I'd say that's a good idea. fbc Mar 2016 #11
Perhaps it's time for some new union leaders, too, eh? Roland99 Mar 2016 #12
Hopefully they'll win and get retroactive pay. Glad to see they retained a good law firm. nt JudyM Mar 2016 #9
Here's an idea if you want to support women's soccer fbc Mar 2016 #13
This NobodyHere Mar 2016 #24
um, they are doing the same job. That's all that counts. threethirteen Mar 2016 #16
Sorry, but professional sports wages is not based on performance....it's ratings davidn3600 Mar 2016 #17
This is a CBA leverage /shaming exercise musiclawyer Mar 2016 #20
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US women's team files wag...»Reply #20