Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: DC votes to put Sanders on primary ballot [View all]JonLeibowitz
(6,282 posts)4. The Clinton campaign is spinning this...and lying while doing so
But the council action did not come without a fight led by Clinton supporters. They sought to use the council interference to highlight that Sanders was in need of a legislative rescue only because his campaign had chosen to pay its way onto the D.C. ballot rather than to collect signatures as Clinton had done.
Sanders put himself into this situation, said D.C. Council member Vincent B. Orange (D-At Large), a chairman of Clintons last presidential campaign in the District. The difference is Hillary Clinton put a crew on the ground and collected signatures Sanders did not.
The problem for Sanders came last month when he took advantage of a Democratic Party rule that allowed him to submit a $2,500 donation to the D.C. Democratic State Committee in lieu of 1,000 signatures to become certified as a candidate in the party primary.
Sanders submitted his check on time. But the committee notified the D.C. Board of Elections a day later, after the deadline to do so, and a Democratic activist challenged Sanderss status as a result.
Sanders put himself into this situation, said D.C. Council member Vincent B. Orange (D-At Large), a chairman of Clintons last presidential campaign in the District. The difference is Hillary Clinton put a crew on the ground and collected signatures Sanders did not.
The problem for Sanders came last month when he took advantage of a Democratic Party rule that allowed him to submit a $2,500 donation to the D.C. Democratic State Committee in lieu of 1,000 signatures to become certified as a candidate in the party primary.
Sanders submitted his check on time. But the committee notified the D.C. Board of Elections a day later, after the deadline to do so, and a Democratic activist challenged Sanderss status as a result.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-bends-rules-to-allow-bernie-sanders-on-the-primary-ballot/2016/04/05/6e0f0c0a-fb3e-11e5-9140-e61d062438bb_story.html
Paying the fee or collecting signatures had nothing to do with the challenge. Lies Lies Lies.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Not over the years, pretty remarkable actually, Dick Morris would be proud nt
geek tragedy
Apr 2016
#11
I, a Bernie supporter, doubt it. It would backfire on HRC, she does not need the negative optics.
FighttheFuture
Apr 2016
#49
how is the campaign lying? or are we back to blaming candidates for everything
geek tragedy
Apr 2016
#10
No I think that part might be accurate. But it's not why his ballot access was challenged.
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
#26
One person not withstanding, most of the people on the DC Council who voted to put Sanders
StevieM
Apr 2016
#31
That's got nothing to do with what I posted. They're still lying about the source of the problems
JonLeibowitz
Apr 2016
#36
Good point. After all, Wisconsin and Washington DC have identical demographics.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2016
#50
Good. I don't support him, but he should not be screwed because DC did not have their
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2016
#27