Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
4. The Clinton campaign is spinning this...and lying while doing so
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 04:18 PM
Apr 2016
But the council action did not come without a fight — led by Clinton supporters. They sought to use the council interference to highlight that Sanders was in need of a legislative rescue only because his campaign had chosen to pay its way onto the D.C. ballot rather than to collect signatures as Clinton had done.

Sanders “put himself into this situation,” said D.C. Council member Vincent B. Orange (D-At Large), a chairman of Clinton’s last presidential campaign in the District. “The difference is Hillary Clinton put a crew on the ground and collected signatures — Sanders did not.”

The problem for Sanders came last month when he took advantage of a Democratic Party rule that allowed him to submit a $2,500 donation to the D.C. Democratic State Committee — in lieu of 1,000 signatures — to become certified as a candidate in the party primary.

Sanders submitted his check on time. But the committee notified the D.C. Board of Elections a day later, after the deadline to do so, and a Democratic activist challenged Sanders’s status as a result.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-bends-rules-to-allow-bernie-sanders-on-the-primary-ballot/2016/04/05/6e0f0c0a-fb3e-11e5-9140-e61d062438bb_story.html

Paying the fee or collecting signatures had nothing to do with the challenge. Lies Lies Lies.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

As it should be! Carolator Apr 2016 #1
They should expect a law suit from the Clinton campaign. Scuba Apr 2016 #2
Do you tire of being wrong? Gothmog Apr 2016 #5
Not over the years, pretty remarkable actually, Dick Morris would be proud nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #11
lol Renew Deal Apr 2016 #28
I hope you're predicting Bernie to win New York and Pennsylvania, nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #9
Pennsylvania will be tough, but NY is clearly in play. n/t. Ken Burch Apr 2016 #32
On what basis??? elleng Apr 2016 #23
I, a Bernie supporter, doubt it. It would backfire on HRC, she does not need the negative optics. FighttheFuture Apr 2016 #49
Awww Bob Brannum has a case of the sadz. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #3
He's lucky he's not serving time... Roland99 Apr 2016 #44
The laws would have to change for any chance of that to happen. 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2016 #48
The Clinton campaign is spinning this...and lying while doing so JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #4
how is the campaign lying? or are we back to blaming candidates for everything geek tragedy Apr 2016 #10
In this case, yes. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #12
So when is it okay to blame Bernie for his supporters? nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #13
This person was her campaign co-chair in 2008. I think it's fair. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #15
is this 2008? In 2008 Martin O'Malley endorsed Clinton geek tragedy Apr 2016 #18
Buh Bye. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #19
happy trails! nt geek tragedy Apr 2016 #20
Seems irrational to make that link to the current campaign, LanternWaste Apr 2016 #55
The fees did not have anything to do with it. They both jwirr Apr 2016 #21
Exactly. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #22
"chosen to pay its way onto the D.C. ballot" Stryder Apr 2016 #25
No I think that part might be accurate. But it's not why his ballot access was challenged. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #26
"chosen to pay its way onto the D.C. ballot" AlbertCat Apr 2016 #46
One person not withstanding, most of the people on the DC Council who voted to put Sanders StevieM Apr 2016 #31
That's got nothing to do with what I posted. They're still lying about the source of the problems JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #36
"a Democratic activist challenged Sander's status". uhhh...not an activist Roland99 Apr 2016 #45
She can't handle the fact that she actually liberalhistorian Apr 2016 #51
Thank you council passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #6
Good. K&R. Amimnoch Apr 2016 #7
To the surprise of no one except those interested only in outrage LonePirate Apr 2016 #8
> and a Democratic activist challenged Sanders’s status as a result. geologic Apr 2016 #14
Bob Brannum. JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #16
thanx... geologic Apr 2016 #30
Megaphone-Wielding Vince Gray Admirer To Help D.C. Remember 9/11 (For $37,000) mpcamb Apr 2016 #38
LOL as if Clinton supporters really had any choice. jwirr Apr 2016 #17
Good! He will lose by 75-25. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #24
Good! He will lose by 75-25. AlbertCat Apr 2016 #47
Good point. After all, Wisconsin and Washington DC have identical demographics. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #50
Whoosh! AlbertCat Apr 2016 #52
LOL! Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #53
Does your post AlbertCat Apr 2016 #54
Good. I don't support him, but he should not be screwed because DC did not have their Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #27
I knew no matter what, the gnashing of teeth would continue Renew Deal Apr 2016 #29
Not sure it shouldn't... mpcamb Apr 2016 #39
yay! wordpix Apr 2016 #33
DC slouches zentrum Apr 2016 #34
I'm sure DWS will get a tongue lashing from her boss eom DebbieCDC Apr 2016 #35
Finally!! Duval Apr 2016 #37
Good. And thanks John Podesta of the Clinton campaign for also calling for Sander's name to be Zira Apr 2016 #40
I'm so happy tonight. Wisconsin, and now DC. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #41
Noice! MynameisBlarney Apr 2016 #42
Good stuff Angrydemex Apr 2016 #43
Good news. SoapBox Apr 2016 #56
Congratulations 'challenger' blackspade Apr 2016 #57
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DC votes to put Sanders o...»Reply #4