Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another wonderful freedom bill by Feinstein. LiberalArkie Apr 2016 #1
DiFi is the kind of "Democrat" we really don't need/want in our big tent. Scuba Apr 2016 #4
Shredding the 4th amendment.. again.. phazed0 Apr 2016 #2
No, its only a 4th amendment violation if they wouldnt have to get a court order. cstanleytech Apr 2016 #3
I see your point about the court order, but I would counter with.. phazed0 Apr 2016 #6
Thats just it though you dont have a constitutional write to encryption, you do however cstanleytech Apr 2016 #11
You're right.. it's just fundamentally wrong and short sighted, IMO phazed0 Apr 2016 #12
"it's just fundamentally wrong and short sighted" Not to mention a complete waste of time. nt cstanleytech Apr 2016 #13
Actually you do have a right to write to encryption. NutmegYankee Apr 2016 #18
Nope, you dont. You can of course secure the documents but if served a warrant you are cstanleytech Apr 2016 #19
Wrong. NutmegYankee Apr 2016 #21
Thank you for repeating the 5th amendment problems that I already mentioned. cstanleytech Apr 2016 #23
I stated the 5th Amendment issue in my first post. NutmegYankee Apr 2016 #24
No, I was pointing out the 4th amendment issues there which require the government to get a warrant cstanleytech Apr 2016 #25
Then we are in violent agreement. NutmegYankee Apr 2016 #26
Writing it and using it are two different things, writing a program is usually protected speech cstanleytech Apr 2016 #28
Honestly EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #5
I hear Ireland is a nice option! nt dorkzilla Apr 2016 #8
Sure EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #9
'zactly. Really a no-brainer dorkzilla Apr 2016 #10
So the first thing I think of when I see Fienstein's name on a bill is "I wonder how she or her PatV Apr 2016 #7
Difi shanti Apr 2016 #14
If only they had encrypted it, maybe it wouldn't have leaked. surrealAmerican Apr 2016 #15
good one! WhiteTara Apr 2016 #16
won't that help foreign companies who are not subject to US laws GreatGazoo Apr 2016 #17
Essentially, yes and its also kinda pointless as people from a foreign country are not obliged cstanleytech Apr 2016 #20
It would destroy the US tech market. Set us back a decade ChairmanAgnostic Apr 2016 #22
And third party apps would be generated with extremely strong encryption. BillZBubb Apr 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Leak of Senate encryption...»Reply #17