Latest Breaking News

reACTIONary

(5,820 posts)

27. +100 !! (NT)

Reply to liberal N proud (Reply #22)

Sat Apr 9, 2016, 08:18 PM

Apr 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

141 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton Accused Of Using Static Noise To Conceal Fundraising Speech [View all] pallidin710 Apr 2016 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author cyberpj Apr 2016 #1

She probably won't say anything, it's such a nonsensical story. She has more important things... George II Apr 2016 #32

Note to whoever's navigating that drive AgerolanAmerican Apr 2016 #41

HRC keeps losing to Bernie left-of-center2012 Apr 2016 #46

Bernie keeps losing to HRC. trueblue2007 Apr 2016 #50

Not recently! Though he will not lose in every state, he is picking up momentum which means JDPriestly Apr 2016 #78

With victories like this, who needs defeats? beastie boy Apr 2016 #107

Even when she wins she loses. DemocracyDirect Apr 2016 #137

Only when the Sanders supporters send out misleading and false communications..... George II Apr 2016 #139

nope Angrydemex Apr 2016 #94

And increasing her delegate lead George II Apr 2016 #57

some have no dignity in victory and fight unity with every word SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #67

Yea, tis' true. Posters like George make me want to not vote for Clinton if she's the nominee. Chan790 Apr 2016 #119

Some of Sanders' supporters "could still learn a lesson in graciousness from the Secretary"..... George II Apr 2016 #127

Yup, you've convinced me. Chan790 Apr 2016 #131

I presume you're admitting that Clinton has won the nomination. Thanks for that. George II Apr 2016 #124

you are very funny SoLeftIAmRight Apr 2016 #141

Not lately... revbones Apr 2016 #90

Saturday isn't "lately"? She increased her delegate lead by 4 in Wyoming, 11-7. George II Apr 2016 #125

7-7... revbones Apr 2016 #126

Okay. Just remember, "the truth will set you free"! George II Apr 2016 #128

Sure. As long as you don't try to mislead any more... nt revbones Apr 2016 #129

Mislead? George II Apr 2016 #132

Yes, mislead. Super delegates vs pledged delegates. nt revbones Apr 2016 #133

Time to take a refresher course on Democratic Party rules. Have a wonderful day. George II Apr 2016 #135

Yes, you definitely should. Super-delegates haven't voted yet. nt revbones Apr 2016 #136

Yes, like keeping her Goldman-Sachs speeches under lock and key. cui bono Apr 2016 #47

She has more speeches "out there" than Bernie has TAX RETURNS. MADem Apr 2016 #52

Face it. She doesn't want Bernie voters to know how about the nasty, snide, cheap remarks JDPriestly Apr 2016 #80

Exactly, check out my sig line! Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #86

I noticed this too mdbl Apr 2016 #100

Successfully gleaning the well-to-do Plucketeer Apr 2016 #68

Democrats are about transparency lastone Apr 2016 #77

Amen itcfish Apr 2016 #123

HRC - Duplicity Is As Duplicity Does cantbeserious Apr 2016 #2

Yup. And she sucks so much in that old SNL sketch that I couldn't last for more than 20 seconds. BeanMusical Apr 2016 #61

Yes Officially Now An Enemy Of The People billhicks76 Apr 2016 #85

+10000 Zira Apr 2016 #87

This is such a stupid lapse of judgment on her part- LiberalElite Apr 2016 #3

Just a testament to her transparency. pallidin710 Apr 2016 #6

So you believe she did it? nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #13

YES nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #17

Of course! cui bono Apr 2016 #48

Another example of her "judgment". nt Duval Apr 2016 #62

Hillary's supporters don't care for transparency when it comes to Hillary. retrowire Apr 2016 #4

When you're talking about campaign strategy, you do that privately. pnwmom Apr 2016 #19

It was a fundraising speech. retrowire Apr 2016 #21

Yes and it was a high money campaing fundraiser passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #58

Now you'll get hammered for linking to Daily Caller, as though the story is a lie 7962 Apr 2016 #102

lol oh i know retrowire Apr 2016 #104

She was speaking to her base...same as Bush's LiberalLovinLug Apr 2016 #112

Bird up! frylock Apr 2016 #25

snort. bird up. dorkzilla Apr 2016 #42

It's the worst show on television. frylock Apr 2016 #88

Omg! I love that show. Not Sure Apr 2016 #93

If you want to hear erlewyne Apr 2016 #5

Yup, pay your $2700 or GTFO n/t TexasBushwhacker Apr 2016 #91

Was she shouting? Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #7

Well Hillary will be making a big speech in Washington on Jan 20, 2017 upaloopa Apr 2016 #8

And ever one of them would be to report.... daleanime Apr 2016 #12

How's she doing to win? The Democratic Party is down to a historic low of 29% (thanks to PatV Apr 2016 #66

Because the GOP is stupid enough to run the only person people like LESS!! 7962 Apr 2016 #103

It's hard to argue with this... Chan790 Apr 2016 #120

But if they dont give it to Trump, they still lose. 7962 Apr 2016 #121

If that happens Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #16

I think that that speech shall be RoccoR5955 Apr 2016 #20

How much will the transcripts cost America that day? Jarqui Apr 2016 #30

I think that depends on who the GOP picks Ruby the Liberal Apr 2016 #73

The GOP can read the polls like the rest of us. Jarqui Apr 2016 #84

Independents aren't Wall Street Ruby the Liberal Apr 2016 #105

she won't get that far. no one will be left who can bring themselves to buy her lies and deceit. roguevalley Apr 2016 #45

A congratulatory speech to President Sanders! Roland99 Apr 2016 #54

It's gonna take her that long to concede? Fuddnik Apr 2016 #69

Yeah - it'll be her concession speech. Plucketeer Apr 2016 #71

We can listen, but can we hear? Might turn out the same as this one. mpcamb Apr 2016 #9

She's very transparent, isn't she? Deadshot Apr 2016 #10

And we should believe reporters because....Washington Post? nt Jitter65 Apr 2016 #11

I've seen plenty of Hillary fans loving WaPo on here today. cui bono Apr 2016 #49

There is actually a video of it at a link posted above in this thread. passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #60

Back yard deals. Cassiopeia Apr 2016 #14

Amazing cognitive dissonance PoliticalMalcontent Apr 2016 #15

Oh, she's transparent, alright. frylock Apr 2016 #23

So what? If it had been INSIDE, it would have been private and no one would have expected otherwise. pnwmom Apr 2016 #18

+100 !! (NT) reACTIONary Apr 2016 #24

like the Bernie computer guy was "wondering" when he dug into HRC's proprietary data files. AlbertCat Apr 2016 #28

OK pallidin710 Apr 2016 #35

Just as Mittens' 47% comment was made indoors Fritz Walter Apr 2016 #55

Being inside, nobody expects to be able to hear you passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #70

Nailed it... they feel "entitled" to know, don't they? NurseJackie Apr 2016 #97

We ARE entitled to know! We're the frickin' American people! pinebox Apr 2016 #130

+1 2naSalit Apr 2016 #134

Oh for f#&$ sake liberal N proud Apr 2016 #22

+100 !! (NT) reACTIONary Apr 2016 #27

She has many faces Red Mountain Apr 2016 #26

Ohhhhh.... spooky.... reACTIONary Apr 2016 #38

Be careful of candidates using technology to control people, Hillary is a walking moral hazard. whereisjustice Apr 2016 #29

Sounds like someone mis-tuned the PA system ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #31

Yeah, sure nichomachus Apr 2016 #36

Hehe. SammyWinstonJack Apr 2016 #43

Are you familiar with Occam's Razor? ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #51

The static noise WAS Hillary's speech nichomachus Apr 2016 #33

^^^this^^^ You hit the 'nail on the head'! Purveyor Apr 2016 #64

I live in Denver. earthside Apr 2016 #34

And became an elitist multimillionaire by selling us out....well her and bill both. SammyWinstonJack Apr 2016 #44

Oh,...so you wanna give me some static? Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #37

Why wouldn't you WANT people to hear your message? hollowdweller Apr 2016 #39

If you are telling a bunch of Democratic DONORS to DOWN TICKET RACES how you intend to MADem Apr 2016 #56

If they're with her, the tickets going down alright. Fuddnik Apr 2016 #72

this is ok with all of you joedogs Apr 2016 #40

We still have those among us who prefer the NSA approach to learning what was said. Ford_Prefect Apr 2016 #79

Be. Sure. To. Drink. Your. Ovaltine! AzDar Apr 2016 #53

I doubt such machines would work to block out all sound. But, Sanders' supporters Hoyt Apr 2016 #59

Correction it should be "But, some of Sanders' supporters" cstanleytech Apr 2016 #82

This^^^ KatyMan Apr 2016 #117

Whitenoisegate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! leftofcool Apr 2016 #63

More conspiracy theory. okasha Apr 2016 #65

The new normal. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #98

What a crock of shit postatomic Apr 2016 #74

There is never any limit to the paranoid crap they will make up, is there? pnwmom Apr 2016 #99

Truth is only relevant if it supports their message postatomic Apr 2016 #118

What is she hiding? JDPriestly Apr 2016 #75

Obviously there are secret neoliberal third way messages coded in the static. beastie boy Apr 2016 #108

You can only hear it if the static is played backwards. leftyladyfrommo Apr 2016 #138

Must be a slow news day. nt cstanleytech Apr 2016 #76

It was a preemptive static strike SHRED Apr 2016 #81

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #83

She is acting like an absolute idiot for someone looking for votes. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #89

shhhhh, there's apparently lots to hide tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #92

Static noise? Oldenuff Apr 2016 #95

Hmmm... Deuce Apr 2016 #96

That's one way to avoid a Mitt Romney 47% comment. Vinca Apr 2016 #101

This accusation is sexist. AngryAmish Apr 2016 #106

And they wonder why some of us don't/can't trust her. AngryOldDem Apr 2016 #109

OMG, OMG, we are surrounded by Hillary's "static noise machines"! beastie boy Apr 2016 #110

OMG! Satanic noise!! reACTIONary Apr 2016 #111

LEAVE HILLARY ALONE !!!! ish of the hammer Apr 2016 #113

She'll let you know the same time she releases the Wall Street transcripts. SoapBox Apr 2016 #114

Cool!!!! Hillary Rocks!!!! johnp3907 Apr 2016 #115

+1 for the Merzbow reference! I CCCC what you did there. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #116

This is too Funny itcfish Apr 2016 #122

EDIT: That just sounds like an echo Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #140