Latest Breaking News

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)

12. Angry armchair lawyer extremists are going to be so disappointed

Sun Apr 10, 2016, 05:00 PM

Apr 2016

When nothing comes of this.

No matter how much unhinged hate-filled spittle you direct at Secretary Clinton, no matter how much you try to twist the law into saying something it doesn't say, being sent an email is not a crime.

And neither does classification after the fact apply to actions taken before the information was classified.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama: Clinton�s Email Server Did Not Jeopardize National Security [View all] MariaThinks Apr 2016 OP

Where exactly does he say what your headline indicates? revbones Apr 2016 #1

This is LBN, where the subject line MUST match the article title. To wit... Hekate Apr 2016 #17

It's in the video. The email discussion starts about 8 minutes in. pnwmom Apr 2016 #25

Thank you Obama passiveporcupine Apr 2016 #67

Meaning you're hoping for the opposite? n/t Designit Apr 2016 #58

Misleading. He said she didn't "intend" to jeopardize national security. Still a crime. leveymg Apr 2016 #2

Angry armchair lawyer extremists are going to be so disappointed ConservativeDemocrat Apr 2016 #12

She signed a security agreement, "classified info is marked or unmarked classified info"> leveymg Apr 2016 #23

Wrong. He also said he believes "she has not jeopardized national security." pnwmom Apr 2016 #28

He said "intentionally jeopardize" and a minute later said "jeopardize" Doesn't matter, because leveymg Apr 2016 #45

Law professor -- who wrote a manual on classification -- explains why Hillary won't be indicted. pnwmom Apr 2016 #54

Different statute, 798 isn't 793. If he discussed 793, let me know, and I'll take a look at that leveymg Apr 2016 #56

Read his whole article and you will learn a lot more than you know now. pnwmom Apr 2016 #60

As I thought, he doesn't even mention the statute that's most referenced in her security oath. leveymg Apr 2016 #61

Nice headline but Obama never said that awake Apr 2016 #3

Yes Obama did. The headline isn't in quotes but all you have to do is listen to the video. pnwmom Apr 2016 #24

When asked he Said "I have to be carful... awake Apr 2016 #36

The interview kept going. Why did you stop listening at that point? pnwmom Apr 2016 #40

That is not the same as the headline awake Apr 2016 #50

Obama was asked another question after he said that he had to be careful. Why do you keep avoiding pnwmom Apr 2016 #55

Yes I watch it live as well as your video awake Apr 2016 #64

misleading headline but I guess azurnoir Apr 2016 #4

It was Sanders who got 3 Pinnochios for only reading the headline a few days ago riversedge Apr 2016 #32

yep he did from Jonathan Capehart's employer no less azurnoir Apr 2016 #34

she said it artfully Kokonoe Apr 2016 #51

K & R most enthusiastically. Surya Gayatri Apr 2016 #5

Next .... FarPoint Apr 2016 #6

KNR Lucinda Apr 2016 #7

The title of the HuffPo piece being cited is... yallerdawg Apr 2016 #8

Of course it is SCantiGOP Apr 2016 #43

Mr President: in that case, don't forget to add Guccifer to the cc line on each email you write. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2016 #9

huffpo shilling once again. that is not what pres o said. restorefreedom Apr 2016 #10

Yes, he did say that. The email discussion begins at about 8 minutes into the interview. pnwmom Apr 2016 #33

Yep, he said it SharonClark Apr 2016 #11

Ding Ding Ding!!! 2naSalit Apr 2016 #19

AND THE TRUTH COMES OUT riversedge Apr 2016 #35

why would it take this long Kokonoe Apr 2016 #65

which would be meaningless if she knowingly/willingly created conditions where some could stupidicus Apr 2016 #13

HA HA. Pres. Obama as a law professor trumps your opine. riversedge Apr 2016 #39

meaningless garbage stupidicus Apr 2016 #47

K&R! DemonGoddess Apr 2016 #14

KnR. Clinton Derangement Syndrome strikes out -- again Hekate Apr 2016 #15

I wish we could put the email issue behind us... Silver_Witch Apr 2016 #16

Remember General Petraeus..... Mustellus Apr 2016 #18

She wasn't even a journalist 2naSalit Apr 2016 #21

Petraeus was originally charged w/felony Sec. 793. He was allowed to plead down. leveymg Apr 2016 #29

Yes shenmue Apr 2016 #20

K&R 2naSalit Apr 2016 #22

A big REC --all need to see riversedge Apr 2016 #26

The road to hell is paved with good intentions. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #27

Putting the accuracy of your statement aside, beastie boy Apr 2016 #44

When the truth hurts the other side 2naSalit Apr 2016 #30

that's what appalls me too MariaThinks Apr 2016 #41

Most who have CDS to that extent are not Democrats BlueMTexpat Apr 2016 #59

Yeah, I suspect that 2naSalit Apr 2016 #66

K&R livetohike Apr 2016 #31

Actually, it did. But not in the way the right wingers and Sandernistas may want you to believe. beastie boy Apr 2016 #37

And drunk drivers don't mean to kill people with their cars dragonfly301 Apr 2016 #38

Then stop prosecuting her before you catch her. beastie boy Apr 2016 #46

and Obama should stop weighing in before the investigation is completed dragonfly301 Apr 2016 #52

This calls for a negotiation between you and Obama. beastie boy Apr 2016 #57

If you are unaware of a mountain of evidence against her, you haven't been paying attention. leveymg Apr 2016 #63

what slayed me the most, and the enamored ones are completely overlooking stupidicus Apr 2016 #53

K&R ismnotwasm Apr 2016 #42

well, that's all cleared up! Javaman Apr 2016 #48

Grrrrr! Grrrrr! Heads gotta be poppin' BIG TIME in the He-Man Wimmin Haters Club!!! MADem Apr 2016 #49

Obama Dodging the issue Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #62

Um, no. Obama doesn't BELIEVE it jeopardized the US or Natl security magical thyme Apr 2016 #68

For a supposed lawyer and law professor TM99 Apr 2016 #69

Locking after a review by forum hosts Omaha Steve Apr 2016 #70