Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Obama: Clinton’s Email Server Did Not Jeopardize National Security [View all]Omaha Steve
(109,168 posts)70. Locking after a review by forum hosts
Please see the earlier post here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141409684
Remember there is a 4 paragraph limit.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama: Clinton’s Email Server Did Not Jeopardize National Security [View all]
MariaThinks
Apr 2016
OP
Misleading. He said she didn't "intend" to jeopardize national security. Still a crime.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#2
She signed a security agreement, "classified info is marked or unmarked classified info">
leveymg
Apr 2016
#23
He said "intentionally jeopardize" and a minute later said "jeopardize" Doesn't matter, because
leveymg
Apr 2016
#45
Law professor -- who wrote a manual on classification -- explains why Hillary won't be indicted.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#54
Different statute, 798 isn't 793. If he discussed 793, let me know, and I'll take a look at that
leveymg
Apr 2016
#56
As I thought, he doesn't even mention the statute that's most referenced in her security oath.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#61
Yes Obama did. The headline isn't in quotes but all you have to do is listen to the video.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#24
Obama was asked another question after he said that he had to be careful. Why do you keep avoiding
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#55
It was Sanders who got 3 Pinnochios for only reading the headline a few days ago
riversedge
Apr 2016
#32
Mr President: in that case, don't forget to add Guccifer to the cc line on each email you write.
DisgustipatedinCA
Apr 2016
#9
Yes, he did say that. The email discussion begins at about 8 minutes into the interview.
pnwmom
Apr 2016
#33
which would be meaningless if she knowingly/willingly created conditions where some could
stupidicus
Apr 2016
#13
Petraeus was originally charged w/felony Sec. 793. He was allowed to plead down.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#29
Actually, it did. But not in the way the right wingers and Sandernistas may want you to believe.
beastie boy
Apr 2016
#37
If you are unaware of a mountain of evidence against her, you haven't been paying attention.
leveymg
Apr 2016
#63