Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: In Hiroshima, Kerry will not apologize for atomic bombs dropped on Japan [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)96. Economic sanctions not a blockade
sanctions in response to Japan waging a war of aggression against their neighbors. The U.S. simply stopped selling oil to Japan - there was no blockade.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
315 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In Hiroshima, Kerry will not apologize for atomic bombs dropped on Japan [View all]
jpak
Apr 2016
OP
Nothing done in or to Iraq comes even close to what the Japanese did in WWII.
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#224
Thus the US agreed NOT to remove the Emperor and post war kept on the old ruling elite
happyslug
Apr 2016
#289
That Soviets didn't care about human life, after the Soviets invaded Finland, and then Poland,
braddy
Apr 2016
#154
Actually the post war study on the bombing said the bombing HELPED the Nazis.
happyslug
Apr 2016
#198
I'm not talking about actions. I'm talking about your dream bombings from 2016z
morningfog
Apr 2016
#240
Dont feel bad about saying something, I support your comment, but I wont make
Jackie Wilson Said
Apr 2016
#151
Hmm thats probably why they say war is hell, every side did things in that war that they shouldnt
cstanleytech
Apr 2016
#52
Depending on who is doing the counting, the Fire Bomb raid on Tokyo caused the greatest loss of life
happyslug
Apr 2016
#205
It's hard for those of Japanese decent to come to terms with the terrible way Japan waged war
TeamPooka
Apr 2016
#58
I was trying to describe the silly duck and cover routines I learned as a kid.
Kablooie
Apr 2016
#272
My wife is Chinese. Rape of Nanking, Unit 731 in Harbin and human experimentation
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#121
300,000 men, women and children in Nanjing. 20,000 women raped in Nanjing
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#260
They started the damn war. No one cared in 1931-1938 when they were butchering Chinese
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#301
"Trying to surrender"? How difficult was it to send a telegram to FDR and Churchill
Nye Bevan
Apr 2016
#6
A lot of it was to save the POWs who were dying by the 10s of 1000s, and in fact were
braddy
Apr 2016
#155
He has been an advocate for reducing/eliminating nuclear weapons his whole career
karynnj
Apr 2016
#99
You do place a great reliance on test scores et al, don't you? Bet you "keep score" too.
Hekate
Apr 2016
#254
Exactly...When they received the warnings on Hiroshima, they knew they were losing
whathehell
Apr 2016
#282
Trying to surrender? lol They took two atomic bomb hits and wanted to keep fighting
TeamPooka
Apr 2016
#59
As I mentioned earlier, the Atomic bombing had NO affect on the decision to surrender
happyslug
Apr 2016
#292
There's nothing like knowing zero about the Axis, especially the Japanese war crimes in Asia.
Hekate
Apr 2016
#159
The 'Empire of Japan' would no doubt agree with you -- Read the Rape of Nanking.
whathehell
Apr 2016
#281
An easy dodge. To some, being a superpower means never saying anything but "Sorry"
whathehell
Apr 2016
#285
there is also the question of why a few days after the first nuclear bomb, they dropped another...
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#148
True, but were three days enough or is it possible that a week or two might have led to surrender
karynnj
Apr 2016
#150
30 yrs ago I met a friend of a friend of and both were WW II vets and one had been a ...
Botany
Apr 2016
#11
How convenient that the one scenario where it's OK to use nukes is the time we used them.
arcane1
Apr 2016
#40
Ike an the others didn't have an issue with incinerating civilians via firebombing
Kaleva
Apr 2016
#118
I've known a lot of WWII vets in my time, even my father who fought the Japanese
braddy
Apr 2016
#178
What would the US do if someone threw up a naval blockade of our oil imports in 1969?
kristopher
Apr 2016
#48
"It is estimated that out of every 6 deaths in the bombings, 5 were civilians and 1 was military."
rug
Apr 2016
#20
International law during World War II did not specifically forbid aerial bombardment of cities.
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#211
Live with the victims and their families as long as I and you fail to feel sympathy
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#275
Still not a word about the Japanese human experimentation in Unit 731, the Three All's policy
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#278
The bomb and Kerry's refusal to apologize provokes the Japanese War Crimes
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#283
I would walk down Main Street accosting random Chinese residents about the Nanking Massacre.
rug
Apr 2016
#284
The fact that you think their was a "naval blockade" of Japan before the war....
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#114
Quote from you "What would the US do if someone threw up a naval blockade of our oil imports in 1969
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#147
You really think the US had a economic embargo against the Japanese in place..
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#210
whether you think incinerating civilians "worked" or not. It is in violation of the law.
EX500rider
Apr 2016
#213
My prior comment only concerned the technical legalities of the use of the atomic bombs.
branford
Apr 2016
#271
Why apologize for ending a war of aggression that committed many documented atrocities?
GummyBearz
Apr 2016
#24
a bomb is a bomb is a bomb unless you are positioning yourself as some sort of victim instead of
msongs
Apr 2016
#35
The pro left, the west can never do any right crowd has taken over this thread.
Dawson Leery
Apr 2016
#39
Nazis already had surrendered to the Soviet Supreme command 4 months earlier :p
MillennialDem
Apr 2016
#125
If those cities were leveled by conventional bombings, would that require an apology?
PersonNumber503602
Apr 2016
#67
Go to the Rape of Nanking Memorial and walk out thinking anyone owes Japan an apology for anything
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#123
No one seems to ever give a shit what the Japanese did in Korea, China, Taiwan
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#122
The problem is that many on DU blame America for everything wrong in the world
Democat
Apr 2016
#129
She was born and raised in Danyang, about 80 miles east of Nanjing. Full blooded Han Chinese
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#196
I think the song is good propaganda. Doesn't mean I like it? And I argue with him about it all the
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#268
Dude, you said it was your favorite song. On a thread about the 2 nukes dropped on Japan.
Bonobo
Apr 2016
#270
You're absolutely right. In fact, atomic bomb was barely a factor in their surrender.
Nyan
Apr 2016
#252
The Japanese high command actually attempted to overthrown Hirohito and confiscate the surrender
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#258
That has been a traditional approach to this. And it has been pretty much debunked by
Nyan
Apr 2016
#262
When they apologize for murdering 28 million Chinese citizens and all the war crimes they
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#259
They have apologized over and over. And they did not murder 28 million citizens.
Bonobo
Apr 2016
#264
You do realize I worked at the Rape of Nanking museum for almost three years.
Feeling the Bern
Apr 2016
#267
Rather than relitigating yesterday's argument, why not read what Secretary actually did and said
karynnj
Apr 2016
#149
My dad was in Borneo when the peace time sneak attack on Pearl harbor was made.
braddy
Apr 2016
#153
Has Japan ASKED for an apology? No? then I don't see the need. We all know it was a horrible
vkkv
Apr 2016
#160
That isn't an answer to my question, when did the American military conduct a genocide
braddy
Apr 2016
#182
It's too broad for me, if fighting and war is now genocide, then it was just about all genocide.
braddy
Apr 2016
#235
I think largely in terms as a soldier and a lifelong student of military history, starting to
braddy
Apr 2016
#257
I'm a military history buff and an American Army veteran, and it is a legitimate question.
braddy
Apr 2016
#184
I read that and many others, I also grew up reading of Hitler and genocide against the Jews, it
braddy
Apr 2016
#186
I think of genocide as trying to physically erase a people to death, such as Hitler practicing
braddy
Apr 2016
#188
If we call a battle genocide or a small war genocide, then what do we call Hitler's actual
braddy
Apr 2016
#190
Hitler was only third to the mass murderers of the 20th century, but again, mass murder
braddy
Apr 2016
#192
Nothing to apologize for. We rebuilt the country & made them a 1st world country.
GOLGO 13
Apr 2016
#207
Very ugly story tailored to titilate those who are nearly drowning in general hatred.
Judi Lynn
Apr 2016
#223