Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

egalitegirl

(362 posts)
61. Most likely
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 09:58 AM
Apr 2016

Many people are naive and believe that the DNC does not get money from Wall Street and does not support the Military Industrial Complex and does not support going to war and that the Clintons are not close friends and partners of the Bush family. So yes, you are right that the DNC could have done this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's a DNC plot. RandySF Apr 2016 #1
Most likely not..... Red Mountain Apr 2016 #3
I think they forgot to add maxsolomon Apr 2016 #30
As much as I dislke the DNC and DWS MynameisBlarney Apr 2016 #20
Actually.... I think this one is just dumb luck and lack of attention. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #48
Most likely egalitegirl Apr 2016 #61
LOL~! MADem Apr 2016 #67
Get the word out any way you can! SoapBox Apr 2016 #2
It really doesn't matter much because CA has open primaries anigbrowl Apr 2016 #32
California Semi-closed Primary Tue, June 7 Californians must register as Democrat or .... agracie Apr 2016 #40
Is this OP X-POSTED in the California Group here? appalachiablue Apr 2016 #44
Sorry… dhill926 Apr 2016 #4
Yeah, this story has cycled around before, that word independent always grabs some. braddy Apr 2016 #5
That is exactly right still_one Apr 2016 #6
actually it is confusing tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #10
You wrote: stopbush Apr 2016 #27
What 'stopbush' said. RiverNoord Apr 2016 #49
No, it says "American Independent Party" csziggy Apr 2016 #53
The first time I registered in CA ('85) alittlelark Apr 2016 #7
Gotta love some "independents." joshcryer Apr 2016 #8
More proof that 'Independents' are hardly liberals. nt onehandle Apr 2016 #9
Goldwater liberals? tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #12
It's just criminal to be 16 and following your parents' lead, isn't it? Hekate Apr 2016 #15
uh, that recording is not of her at 16 tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #16
You aren't getting the message, Hekate! Duval Apr 2016 #46
You got it, tomm2thumbs! Duval Apr 2016 #45
300,000 too-rich-to-be-literate voters speaks volumes about those Independents Bernie supporters Jitter65 Apr 2016 #11
I don't drink or smoke pot. FlaGranny Apr 2016 #17
Are you an independent in Cali? snooper2 Apr 2016 #18
No, actually FlaGranny Apr 2016 #19
The "ignore button" works very well. Duval Apr 2016 #47
A Belated Happy Birthday!! n/t FlaGranny Apr 2016 #62
Nicely done in insulting an entire block of voters... Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #42
They still have time to change their registration away from the party of Geo Wallace, segregationist Hekate Apr 2016 #13
you funny tomm2thumbs Apr 2016 #14
Somehow I don't believe you really mean this. Duval Apr 2016 #24
Why would I not mean this? I am a lifelong Dem and a Californian. Hekate Apr 2016 #34
American Independent Party, huh? Art_from_Ark Apr 2016 #21
Most indys should register under the "idiot party" ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #22
I'm guessing this site is too biased to the point of supporting EXTREME DEMOCRATIC Zira Apr 2016 #31
Well, you've been here just over a month... Hekate Apr 2016 #35
I'm a Democrat ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #57
Independents make up 40% of voters now, while Democrats are down to barely appalachiablue Apr 2016 #60
A huge mistake. Duval Apr 2016 #23
RW ultra-conservative 'Party' uses the word Independent in their name when the word should be Con. Sunlei Apr 2016 #25
The year was 1967. They were a breakaway party. They get to call themselves what they like. Hekate Apr 2016 #36
People need to read a document before they sign it. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #26
I wonder how many will blame Hillary when they can't vote WhiteTara Apr 2016 #28
Nobody because CA is an open primary state anigbrowl Apr 2016 #33
actually it's only sort of open WhiteTara Apr 2016 #37
Thanks for that clairification anigbrowl Apr 2016 #38
... WhiteTara Apr 2016 #39
American Independent didn't pull that name out of the air. It's deliberate. Xithras Apr 2016 #29
Same in New York. djg21 Apr 2016 #58
Another one of those "unfortunate accidents"..I guess... Bohemianwriter Apr 2016 #41
Like "Jews For Buchanan" in the 2000 election, Florida. muntrv Apr 2016 #43
Not found ghostsinthemachine Apr 2016 #50
Make sure to try your CDL # if you didn't. Mine worked when I did that. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #51
Where can I do that? ghostsinthemachine Apr 2016 #54
Its part of info they ask for in my county. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #56
Independents still wouldn't be able to vote. procon Apr 2016 #52
Sort of a Darwin Award for voter registration. yardwork Apr 2016 #55
All the people here who are uncaring about voter disenfranchisment Lordquinton Apr 2016 #59
Banana Republic. We need Voter Oversight. libdem4life Apr 2016 #63
maybe they should go ahead and take over the party now that they're registered as members Bucky Apr 2016 #64
Somehow I doubt that is an accident. Unicorn Apr 2016 #65
If you cannot commit to being a democrat, you shouldn't get to participate in the selection. Firebrand Gary Apr 2016 #66
Careful, there. Declaring openly here that you're a Democrat might get you alerted. baldguy Apr 2016 #69
People get taken in by the RW lie that "Democrats are just as bad as Republicans" and get screwed. baldguy Apr 2016 #68
Voter IQ test? Adrahil Apr 2016 #70
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»More Than 300,000 Califor...»Reply #61