Latest Breaking News

certainot

(9,090 posts)

15. why would the republicans do that? they want him to testify

Reply to Post removed (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 22, 2016, 09:23 PM

Apr 2016

this clinton trolling is idiotic

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

105 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Despite Immunity, Former Clinton Staffer Again Says No To Testifying To Congress [View all] Purveyor Apr 2016 OP

This is almost expected. What will be interesting is whether they seek a subpoena or not JonLeibowitz Apr 2016 #1

Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #2

why would the republicans do that? they want him to testify certainot Apr 2016 #15

who said anything about Rs? nashville_brook Apr 2016 #18

because that's what they do certainot Apr 2016 #24

just saying, as above, no one said anything about Rs nashville_brook Apr 2016 #34

they're suggesting hillary! certainot Apr 2016 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #101

you are naive certainot Apr 2016 #103

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #104

discounting the possibility because certainot Apr 2016 #105

Hillary's people do not want him to testify. -none Apr 2016 #57

When you suggest on DU that Democrats might murder people, you're trolling muriel_volestrangler Apr 2016 #73

"Democrats" are not monolithic. -none Apr 2016 #75

Well - he has a family. 840high Apr 2016 #19

That could be in play too. -none Apr 2016 #58

This news will make a great political ad. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #3

Won't it? She will get eviscerated in a general election. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #4

I dont know, she likely has a trove of crap on Trump. 7962 Apr 2016 #12

She doesn't inspire me to vote. At all. In fact, if the party embarrasses me by nominating her, silvershadow Apr 2016 #14

and here's a vote fro Trump azureblue Apr 2016 #22

I am. Fact is, right now he is to the left of her on many issues. MANY. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #25

List the many issues here, please. n/t tabasco Apr 2016 #30

Not going there. silvershadow Apr 2016 #31

Ya' got nothing. tabasco Apr 2016 #32

No these people are just gnashing at the teeth to alert on me, and the ridiculous silvershadow Apr 2016 #33

No, fuck Trump tabasco Apr 2016 #36

I can't vote for her. Period. End of story. Some of us won't. She will lose it on her own accord. silvershadow Apr 2016 #40

Ah, you think Trump is a desirable left alternative to Clinton? anigbrowl Apr 2016 #37

No. I think he is to the left of her, not that he is desirable. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #62

I think she turned her back on Labor with a big L. I owe her nothing. Nor a party that would silvershadow Apr 2016 #63

and here's a vote (for) Trump AlbertCat Apr 2016 #46

Logical fallacy. dchill Apr 2016 #51

That's what happens coyote Apr 2016 #76

When first I heard Susan Sarandon greiner3 Apr 2016 #94

bernie is extremely brave. most other good dems are afraid certainot Apr 2016 #27

It would take a George Soros to fund left wing radio. It has been tried and tried. silvershadow Apr 2016 #28

no. you are playing into their bullshit - that talk radio is a reflection certainot Apr 2016 #39

Sounds good. Get skippy then. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #42

skippy the bush kangaroo? i think he's dead certainot Apr 2016 #43

no, skippy the left wing radio baron. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #44

You rang! greiner3 Apr 2016 #95

Then why do most Liberal attempts fail to get decent ratings? 7962 Apr 2016 #64

u r troll certainot Apr 2016 #67

BRILLIANT response. When you've got nothing, go with that. 7962 Apr 2016 #82

Most Liberals aren't authoritarians? snort Apr 2016 #84

Good point. 7962 Apr 2016 #85

you're certainly right about that! nt 7962 Apr 2016 #61

If there is a 'trove of crap' on Trump, the pukes would have used it already unless of course hill Purveyor Apr 2016 #23

Of all the garbage thrown at the Clintons creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #56

Yeah. The FBI spends months and months on a criminal investigation because there is Purveyor Apr 2016 #89

Over a year now. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #102

I dont know, I'm thinking they're afraid to hurt his chances now 7962 Apr 2016 #65

Now perhaps but if there really is something on Trump, the Bush cabal would have fired both barrels Purveyor Apr 2016 #88

Heck, was Jeb! ever really IN the race!? 7962 Apr 2016 #90

Trouble is, neither Trump nor his supporters bvf Apr 2016 #29

one will use lack of ice to get a trophy polar bear and certainot Apr 2016 #45

Trump will be able to counter most of what she can throw at him though. JoeyT Apr 2016 #68

Great choice... VOTE FOR THE LESS REVOLTING! MrMickeysMom Apr 2016 #79

Thats what it boils down to; who is disliked the least. Odd cycle..... 7962 Apr 2016 #83

when benghazi happened i immediately turned on rw radio certainot Apr 2016 #21

Thank you, excellent points on the influence & dominance RW radio has on America. Sunlei Apr 2016 #78

Would this indicate that there is something incriminating? TxGrandpa Apr 2016 #5

Something(s) that someone(s) don't want disclosed, elleng Apr 2016 #7

Not necessarily Tempest Apr 2016 #35

Yeah, and they'll never be able to twist or distort his refusal to testify! Scuba Apr 2016 #70

Could they HDSam Apr 2016 #6

I think they can retract the immunity rpannier Apr 2016 #8

Maybe the opposite? Compel him to testify & emphasize the immunity? 7962 Apr 2016 #11

Its the exact Opposite Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #38

It was Justice that granted immunity. sofa king Apr 2016 #93

I think he has an allergy! SCVDem Apr 2016 #9

He's allergic to kangaroos. AlbertCat Apr 2016 #48

It's the same principle SCVDem Apr 2016 #49

This hearing serves no purpose, other than an attempt to yet again, get a Clinton. AlbertCat Apr 2016 #50

Its being investigated by the FBI creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #59

Wait. MacDougall? Is this the husband of the woman who went to prison for the Clintons? me b zola Apr 2016 #10

Secret speeches, secret servers. I can see what we will get with Hillary as President. jalan48 Apr 2016 #13

Drip, drip, drip. thesquanderer Apr 2016 #16

No subpoena, no show. leveymg Apr 2016 #17

Does the fact that Pagliano was granted immunity CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #52

FBI is working with Justice. Usually a grand jury has to be convened before IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #97

K&R red dog 1 Apr 2016 #20

Yes, I caught the same thing CoffeeCat Apr 2016 #55

In answer to your question, YES. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #98

Subpoena time. LS_Editor Apr 2016 #26

He's betting she'll be Queen laserhaas Apr 2016 #47

No one can be forced to testify without immunity. Yo_Mama Apr 2016 #66

He only gets immunity for testifying and must lose it laserhaas Apr 2016 #69

The immunity offer comes from the FBI, not Congress. Testifying or not Yo_Mama Apr 2016 #74

The offer of immunity comes from the US AG ripcord Apr 2016 #77

Matters not were it arose....its contempt to refuse laserhaas Apr 2016 #87

stuff happens reddread Apr 2016 #53

Just wow...remember this is a tax payer funded job, and we have a right to know what happened, ViseGrip Apr 2016 #54

I think he was paid privately creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #60

Source, please. Scuba Apr 2016 #71

here creeksneakers2 Apr 2016 #72

Thanks...that just about covers it. Deuce Apr 2016 #81

He was a government employee also. nt IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #99

Does anyone here know the actual terms of Pagliano's immunity? winter is coming Apr 2016 #80

They weren't published laserhaas Apr 2016 #86

Oh boy! My 1st thought: I hope he doesn't get anywhere near Congress. Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #91

Congress needs to let the FBI do its job Bradical79 Apr 2016 #92

The FBI is already finished talking to Pagliano. Major Hogwash Apr 2016 #96

I stand corrected then Bradical79 Apr 2016 #100