Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

CincyDem

(7,359 posts)

2. They're working on their 4-4 strategy.

Reply to jpak (Original post)

Mon May 2, 2016, 10:29 AM

May 2016

Best they could do on this one was probably a 4-4 that would leave the decision intact applicable only to the 9th circuit...exactly where the decision stands now. So why bother. Sad that the rethugs have let the judiciary sink to this level (or rather, sad that they've put cement shoes on the judiciary to ensure it sinks to this level).

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Supreme Court rejects challenge to Seattle minimum wage law [View all] jpak May 2016 OP

Wow this is a pleasant surprise to wake up to in the morning! nt strategery blunder May 2016 #1

They're working on their 4-4 strategy. CincyDem May 2016 #2

They're still hoping to win the WH.. Wounded Bear May 2016 #3

Yep... CincyDem May 2016 #5

These are the same Rethugs who believe in local control . . FairWinds May 2016 #4