Latest Breaking News

thereismore

(13,326 posts)

28. There are articles of law where you don't need an intent. Negligence is enough in some cases. nt

Reply to Divernan (Reply #11)

Thu May 5, 2016, 09:40 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

FBI Interviews Clinton Aides Including Huma Abedin As Part Of Email Probe [View all] Purveyor May 2016 OP

... FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #1

so Hillary's closest allies aren't incriminating her azurnoir May 2016 #2

They weren't offered immunity. HooptieWagon May 2016 #6

If it were up to the FBI you might be right... TipTok May 2016 #14

The attorney general said "career staff" were dealing with it. nt IdaBriggs May 2016 #48

Maybe they are... TipTok May 2016 #52

Is this true because it keeps getting repeated? Tribalceltic May 2016 #3

Your statement is trivially false. Wishful thoughts? nt thereismore May 2016 #35

A preview of what a Clinton Presidency will be like. jalan48 May 2016 #4

There'll be bipartisan war. HooptieWagon May 2016 #7

Oh yeah. Wall Street loves their wars and Hillary loves Wall Street. jalan48 May 2016 #9

I really hope you are wrong ripcord May 2016 #43

Nothing to worry about Abouttime May 2016 #5

Obama could just pardon her now. HooptieWagon May 2016 #8

Is that even possible? NWCorona May 2016 #16

It is possible, but he won't do it pre-emptively. That would look bad. He might try to influence thereismore May 2016 #27

Trump would love that. LS_Editor May 2016 #19

Or maybe... just maybe... she is lucky she didn't do anything incriminating... beastie boy May 2016 #39

you know she's guilty of something dlwickham May 2016 #51

So, status quo. The investigations continue. She still hasn't been cleared. No news here. nt silvershadow May 2016 #10

So not "willfully" - just negligently and carelessly re national security. Divernan May 2016 #11

There are articles of law where you don't need an intent. Negligence is enough in some cases. nt thereismore May 2016 #28

Absolutely, says this retired law professor! Divernan May 2016 #33

Yes, it's there to reassure the gullible so they can rest easy. The reality is, she is not in the thereismore May 2016 #34

These stories are getting old and boring. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #12

you are darn right they are. The FBI interviews people involved in the investigation, and of course still_one May 2016 #17

I find your tag line offensive. I'm guessing others do as well. We're still in the primary and FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #21

It's all about seeing the glass half full or the glass half empty. nolawarlock May 2016 #22

Okay, well then, keep drinking whatever you're drinking, because the little "x"s where the bird's FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #38

That's not the case at all. nolawarlock May 2016 #42

I'll have to take your word for it till I'm down there again. I see all the hides in your profile, FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #45

Lol. So will your candidate apparently. nolawarlock May 2016 #47

Ha. No wonder you have so many hides. FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #53

boring? mushroomhunter May 2016 #23

What is wrong with birds? nolawarlock May 2016 #24

And haven't you ever seen the film? nolawarlock May 2016 #25

Another one for the bin. There are so many of you, and you can't help yourselves. Bye now. nt thereismore May 2016 #29

*sigh* nolawarlock May 2016 #37

How would "U.S. officials" know whether investigators have found no evidence.. frylock May 2016 #13

Noticed that too... TipTok May 2016 #15

CNN reporting. HooptieWagon May 2016 #18

And "sources close to the story" catnhatnh May 2016 #20

I imagine the FBI and the DOJ are fairly pissed about that CNN quote CoffeeCat May 2016 #26

+1 tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #30

The interviews are the story, you are correct! Everything else is fluff. thereismore May 2016 #36

On Tuesday Hillary said neither she nor any of her staff had been contacted yet by the FBI riderinthestorm May 2016 #46

Clearly, Hillary was not lying about her aids being interviewed CoffeeCat May 2016 #49

Well maybe Huma Abedin and Hillary never talk riderinthestorm May 2016 #50

"Willful violations" sounds a lot like "no emails marked classified". Same kind of smoke screen thereismore May 2016 #31

This message was self-deleted by its author beastie boy May 2016 #40

It's " U.S. officials briefed on the investigation" beastie boy May 2016 #41

Who, outside of the DoJ, is being briefed on an ongoing investigation? frylock May 2016 #54

Can't answer that. Try CNN. beastie boy May 2016 #55

If they knew, they would have added that information. frylock May 2016 #56

Wait, so there IS an investigation? I thought it was done by the Federal Bureau of Reviews... nt thereismore May 2016 #32

Oh yes, there is an investigation. beastie boy May 2016 #44