Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

... FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #1
so Hillary's closest allies aren't incriminating her azurnoir May 2016 #2
They weren't offered immunity. HooptieWagon May 2016 #6
If it were up to the FBI you might be right... TipTok May 2016 #14
The attorney general said "career staff" were dealing with it. nt IdaBriggs May 2016 #48
Maybe they are... TipTok May 2016 #52
Is this true because it keeps getting repeated? Tribalceltic May 2016 #3
Your statement is trivially false. Wishful thoughts? nt thereismore May 2016 #35
A preview of what a Clinton Presidency will be like. jalan48 May 2016 #4
There'll be bipartisan war. HooptieWagon May 2016 #7
Oh yeah. Wall Street loves their wars and Hillary loves Wall Street. jalan48 May 2016 #9
I really hope you are wrong ripcord May 2016 #43
Nothing to worry about Abouttime May 2016 #5
Obama could just pardon her now. HooptieWagon May 2016 #8
Is that even possible? NWCorona May 2016 #16
It is possible, but he won't do it pre-emptively. That would look bad. He might try to influence thereismore May 2016 #27
Trump would love that. LS_Editor May 2016 #19
Or maybe... just maybe... she is lucky she didn't do anything incriminating... beastie boy May 2016 #39
you know she's guilty of something dlwickham May 2016 #51
So, status quo. The investigations continue. She still hasn't been cleared. No news here. nt silvershadow May 2016 #10
So not "willfully" - just negligently and carelessly re national security. Divernan May 2016 #11
There are articles of law where you don't need an intent. Negligence is enough in some cases. nt thereismore May 2016 #28
Absolutely, says this retired law professor! Divernan May 2016 #33
Yes, it's there to reassure the gullible so they can rest easy. The reality is, she is not in the thereismore May 2016 #34
These stories are getting old and boring. nt nolawarlock May 2016 #12
you are darn right they are. The FBI interviews people involved in the investigation, and of course still_one May 2016 #17
I find your tag line offensive. I'm guessing others do as well. We're still in the primary and FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #21
It's all about seeing the glass half full or the glass half empty. nolawarlock May 2016 #22
Okay, well then, keep drinking whatever you're drinking, because the little "x"s where the bird's FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #38
That's not the case at all. nolawarlock May 2016 #42
I'll have to take your word for it till I'm down there again. I see all the hides in your profile, FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #45
Lol. So will your candidate apparently. nolawarlock May 2016 #47
Ha. No wonder you have so many hides. FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #53
boring? mushroomhunter May 2016 #23
What is wrong with birds? nolawarlock May 2016 #24
And haven't you ever seen the film? nolawarlock May 2016 #25
Another one for the bin. There are so many of you, and you can't help yourselves. Bye now. nt thereismore May 2016 #29
*sigh* nolawarlock May 2016 #37
How would "U.S. officials" know whether investigators have found no evidence.. frylock May 2016 #13
Noticed that too... TipTok May 2016 #15
CNN reporting. HooptieWagon May 2016 #18
And "sources close to the story" catnhatnh May 2016 #20
I imagine the FBI and the DOJ are fairly pissed about that CNN quote CoffeeCat May 2016 #26
+1 tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #30
The interviews are the story, you are correct! Everything else is fluff. thereismore May 2016 #36
On Tuesday Hillary said neither she nor any of her staff had been contacted yet by the FBI riderinthestorm May 2016 #46
Clearly, Hillary was not lying about her aids being interviewed CoffeeCat May 2016 #49
Well maybe Huma Abedin and Hillary never talk riderinthestorm May 2016 #50
"Willful violations" sounds a lot like "no emails marked classified". Same kind of smoke screen thereismore May 2016 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author beastie boy May 2016 #40
It's " U.S. officials briefed on the investigation" beastie boy May 2016 #41
Who, outside of the DoJ, is being briefed on an ongoing investigation? frylock May 2016 #54
Can't answer that. Try CNN. beastie boy May 2016 #55
If they knew, they would have added that information. frylock May 2016 #56
Wait, so there IS an investigation? I thought it was done by the Federal Bureau of Reviews... nt thereismore May 2016 #32
Oh yes, there is an investigation. beastie boy May 2016 #44
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FBI Interviews Clinton Ai...»Reply #54