Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sheshe2

(97,642 posts)
182. hmmmm
Sun May 8, 2016, 12:53 AM
May 2016

Reaching across the aisle.

What Bernie Sanders Can Bring to Liberty University

When the presidential hopeful visits Liberty University, he’ll expose students to a party otherwise cloaked by the many Republican presidential candidates that have come before him—can his visit influence a conservative audience?

It’s not unusual for Liberty University to host politicians. In the spring of this year, it gained national attention when Ted Cruz announced his presidential bid on campus. Liberty has hosted speakers such as Donald Trump, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, and Sean Hannity. But when Liberty University announced its convocation speakers for the fall of 2015, including Scott Walker and Ben Carson, it included an unexpected name: Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

As a student at Liberty University, I have learned from my professors how to apply my conservative theology to all areas of my life. And that’s why I’m drawn to support Bernie Sanders’s presidential campaign.

Jerry Falwell, the founder of the university, strongly believed that teaching students how to integrate their Christian worldview into all sectors of their lives, especially politics, is an essential part of providing a Christian education. I agree with the Liberty University Doctrinal Statement, which says that the Bible is “true revelation” that is “inspired by God” to create a standard of truth, there is one God “who exists eternally in three persons,” and Jesus Christ “offered himself as a sacrifice” for humanity’s sin. However, I find myself in the minority on campus politically.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/09/what-bernie-sanders-can-bring-to-liberty-university/404926/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Heh. Watch the MSM ignore it ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #1
so technically even with Guam PatrynXX May 2016 #9
And now she has moved from 92% of the delegates she needs to 93%. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #59
Your Candidate Is In Bed With The Bush Family billhicks76 May 2016 #77
Hillary Clinton is a diplomat, like Ted Kennedy was. If she can find a way to work across the aisle, pnwmom May 2016 #83
"I knew Ted Kennedy"... ReRe May 2016 #87
As I said, things have deteriorated since crossing the aisle was the norm. We'd be better off pnwmom May 2016 #88
Hillary certainly knows how to cross the aisle and join with Republicans. bvar22 May 2016 #95
And Hillary has more than 12 million votes and 1700 pledged delegates. And Bernie does not. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #98
...and exactly WHAT does THAT have to do with your advocacy for bvar22 May 2016 #107
Dubya had more votes than Kerry lbrtbell May 2016 #108
SNAP and double SNAP Silver_Witch May 2016 #133
Debating the flaws and virtues of the candidates now is beside the point. pnwmom May 2016 #194
Funny how that is, where you're okay, how those laserhaas May 2016 #114
Bernie has flip flopped, too. He was against the Brady bill, now he's for it. pnwmom May 2016 #120
"And Hillary has more than 12 million votes and 1700 pledged delegates. And Bernie does not. n/t" LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #192
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #202
lmfao retrowire May 2016 #206
+1 ! FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #113
Preach it! Silver_Witch May 2016 #134
hmmmm sheshe2 May 2016 #182
TPPillary certainly does. forest444 May 2016 #213
We agree on something!!! Yeah. How's that for crossing the aisle? ;-) eom ReRe May 2016 #111
😎 laserhaas May 2016 #115
What is that, laserhaas? ReRe May 2016 #122
Just a smiley face and thumb up laserhaas May 2016 #143
Ha! ReRe May 2016 #164
Nope Joe swore off stogies laserhaas May 2016 #190
I Actually Enjoy Your Comments billhicks76 May 2016 #118
You don't cross the aisle to people who want you destroyed.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #146
Bernie has worked across the aisle on his opposition pnwmom May 2016 #161
Because they will be destroyed back home if they are seen with her. Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #162
Teddy was a drunk that killed national health care reform Buzz cook May 2016 #195
The person you describe... ReRe May 2016 #198
She's already crossed the aisle. She needs to find a way to work back across the aisle. n/t cui bono May 2016 #141
True that! mdbl May 2016 #199
Hillary Courting Bush Donors As Of 2 Days Ago billhicks76 May 2016 #229
I agree, good or bad, Hillary will be able to work with the Republicans NWCorona May 2016 #159
She's asking for the votes of anyone who wants a SANE President. That sounds like a low bar, pnwmom May 2016 #160
If Hillary was just asking for Republican votes I wouldn't have a problem. NWCorona May 2016 #163
HRC is at the top of a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party. grasswire May 2016 #217
She gained 4 in Guam, he got 3 - TBF May 2016 #200
The MSM should ignore it. FarPoint May 2016 #12
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #17
Nickels and dimes? Naw she holds out for the big bucks ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #18
win ^ n/t RazBerryBeret May 2016 #68
Well I mean really, it's what they offered.......how can she refuse SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #150
Keep telling yourself that! Chasstev365 May 2016 #27
Well, if you didn't have a big Hillary Clinton logo on your post, your opinion bjo59 May 2016 #28
I know.... FarPoint May 2016 #58
Wow. Advocating against a free press? Coventina May 2016 #35
Oh, on the contrary... FarPoint May 2016 #40
Reporting on our national elections is extremely important. Coventina May 2016 #43
No it's not... FarPoint May 2016 #57
You are confusing your personal value system with the duty of the press in our democracy. Coventina May 2016 #60
You need to keep up with the news lbrtbell May 2016 #109
Right On!! LovingA2andMI May 2016 #152
It has always been U.S. with him laserhaas May 2016 #191
Funny, as hell.... (Also. you were blocked --- let's take care of that again) LovingA2andMI May 2016 #203
Uh... ReRe May 2016 #168
Kind and considerate ReRe laserhaas May 2016 #215
Jeee wilikers, and here I thought 'you guys' were into .....math. pangaia May 2016 #38
And the reason you can say that so... ReRe May 2016 #110
A...Men...ReRe laserhaas May 2016 #147
If it's not Trump, it's not news, apparently. nt valerief May 2016 #79
if elected, he would be the first president to be completely ignored by MSM yurbud May 2016 #224
Considering the ballot count isn't until the 24th... scscholar May 2016 #230
KnR for more Sanders delegates! Woot! n/t 99th_Monkey May 2016 #2
Cool laserhaas May 2016 #5
Kicketty Kickin' Faux pas May 2016 #3
Nate Silvers annavictorious May 2016 #4
The importance of Hillary's win in Guam stopbush May 2016 #6
The importance of Hillary's win.... anywhere... AlbertCat May 2016 #19
Bitter much? rusty fender May 2016 #23
Bitter much? AlbertCat May 2016 #61
hmmmm puffy socks May 2016 #36
So far, she's had about 12.6 million votes; Bernie 9.5 million muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #48
By winning in the electoral college. JDPriestly May 2016 #65
I credit Susan Sarandon annavictorious May 2016 #125
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #142
Millions fewer want Bernie for President. nt pnwmom May 2016 #53
Millions more would have wanted Bernie.... ReRe May 2016 #117
Many candidates annavictorious May 2016 #126
I never thought much of that, but... ReRe May 2016 #127
Not fact jmowreader May 2016 #154
Oh Gawdddddd...... ReRe May 2016 #175
It's over. jmowreader May 2016 #178
Yeah, it's over alright... ReRe May 2016 #183
So...how much WAS your check from Revolution Messaging this month? jmowreader May 2016 #184
It was $27... ReRe May 2016 #185
Wait a minute... ReRe May 2016 #186
Happy to jmowreader May 2016 #188
Bernie Sanders didn't.... ReRe May 2016 #189
If Hillary's supporters did the same thing to a Bernie rally, you'd blame her jmowreader May 2016 #193
Well... ReRe May 2016 #225
Latinos are obviously not in lockstep for the Clinton Machine... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #201
Agreed! n/t ReRe May 2016 #226
Do you REALLY want your President or Candidate to have the power to... bvar22 May 2016 #221
Sovereign citizens like you disgust me jmowreader May 2016 #227
must by "controlled" by a "central authority". bvar22 May 2016 #228
OK... ReRe May 2016 #231
Yeah. I call bullshit. stopbush May 2016 #82
I guess every first lady had the position "handed" to her annavictorious May 2016 #121
The fine Senator remained silent when Geronimoe May 2016 #137
and Hillary needs to win 73% of remaining delegates to reach 2383 magical thyme May 2016 #51
Bernie needs 97%. That sound doable to you? nt pnwmom May 2016 #62
No she doesn't. The 522 superdelegates DO count towards 2383. beastie boy May 2016 #71
not yet Ed Suspicious May 2016 #157
Oh yes they do. Today. beastie boy May 2016 #166
Do you have even a passing familiarity with the truth? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #167
Let me see... the truth is what you wish things would be... beastie boy May 2016 #169
Have the super delegates already cast their votes at the convention? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #171
Have the pledged delegates already cast their votes? beastie boy May 2016 #173
No. That 73% would be pledged delegates only. stopbush May 2016 #81
hello? I wrote 73% based on pledged delegates and that neither can win w/out supers magical thyme May 2016 #135
Yawn. stopbush May 2016 #138
Sad that you can't let it play out without being a jerk. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #172
Sad that Sanders can't see that it already has played out. stopbush May 2016 #204
Bottom line: No one needs to make it on pledged delegates alone. Thor_MN May 2016 #91
Hillary will win - no problem - on the first ballot... reACTIONary May 2016 #155
Then what the fuck are you worried about? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #158
Ed, thanks.. reACTIONary May 2016 #165
Silver's ..the man always amazed Bernie does better laserhaas May 2016 #7
Always? annavictorious May 2016 #8
Which is more inane...my thinking Sanders has a chance laserhaas May 2016 #10
We worked quite hard here in MA for Hillary Chico Man May 2016 #22
The fact that you are working hard for a friend of my well known adversary laserhaas May 2016 #24
Endearing you isn't the goal Chico Man May 2016 #33
Endearing EVERY voter is the goal of a volunteer lbrtbell May 2016 #112
That's completely unrealistic Chico Man May 2016 #177
Why do people work so hard for a power-loving liar? pangaia May 2016 #39
Why have you subscribed to the vast right wing conspiracy of Hillary haters? Chico Man May 2016 #42
I have not subscribed to anything. I do not hate her. pangaia May 2016 #50
"Power loving liar"? Chico Man May 2016 #64
No,, she loves power, and she repeatedly lies.. Just facts. pangaia May 2016 #67
that's your opinion Chico Man May 2016 #74
Stop putting words in my mouth and assuming my thoughts. pangaia May 2016 #149
Boo hoo Chico Man May 2016 #174
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R May 2016 #153
I would wager they are not liberal nor progressive Chico Man May 2016 #176
You just lost a wager. pangaia May 2016 #179
Got me Chico Man May 2016 #180
This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R May 2016 #222
That's the answer to every criticism Clinton faces Scootaloo May 2016 #85
You could also ask, why do people work so hard for a hippie-commie-blowhard? pnwmom May 2016 #69
He is not a hippie. He is not a commie and he is not a blowhard. pangaia May 2016 #72
In your opinion. That's what the ads would have said in the general, if he'd gotten that far. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #73
They refusing to see that's the reality. laserhaas May 2016 #144
Good on you. mahina May 2016 #80
Got that right. snort May 2016 #100
What a ridiculously sexist thing to say. annavictorious May 2016 #128
I haven't been following the math............ mrmpa May 2016 #14
Sorry, super delegates are not going to switch their vote to Bernie leftofcool May 2016 #16
That will never change the fact that most of America ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #21
Ya mean the Super's that were committed before anyone else entered the race laserhaas May 2016 #26
Super delegates shouldn't even be voting unless a convention emergency occurs. Lars39 May 2016 #34
The DNC is bought and paid for greymouse May 2016 #20
Sad state of affairs laserhaas May 2016 #29
Super delegates vote at the same time as the pledged delegates. annavictorious May 2016 #131
+100 !! Contested convention? What a .... reACTIONary May 2016 #156
Sanders could have run as an independent. annavictorious May 2016 #129
Unless a deal has been made to keep her in line laserhaas May 2016 #31
It won't be six months, but definitely before the mid-terms... truebrit71 May 2016 #54
Hoping to see is one thing. Actually seeing is another. stopbush May 2016 #84
I'm not seeing it... mrmpa May 2016 #102
Threats from the Sanders zealots that they won't vote for Hillary stopbush May 2016 #205
With all due respect.......... mrmpa May 2016 #207
So, you call the Obama presidency "going through the motions?" stopbush May 2016 #208
No I don't............. mrmpa May 2016 #209
So what was the point of your post #207? stopbush May 2016 #210
In toto......... mrmpa May 2016 #214
Ha! Interesting to have a Sanders supporter claiming others stopbush May 2016 #219
Last I saw & read, DU is a progressive, liberal Democrat site.......... mrmpa May 2016 #220
Before the vote Nate posted that he expected Bernie would be stronger than the polls showed pnwmom May 2016 #66
Keep the good news coming! Thanks for posting. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #37
So has The Green Papers LiberalFighter May 2016 #45
of course it didn't cost her $2M or 2cents. Between the massive free press, Superpac spending, not magical thyme May 2016 #46
Who is Nate SilverS? JackRiddler May 2016 #75
I haven't read the article but Washington the State hasn't elected their state delegates yet. rhett o rick May 2016 #11
Delegates and Caucuser - We Don't Need No Stinking Delegates & Caucusers laserhaas May 2016 #30
Don't they go by the results of the caucuses? LiberalFighter May 2016 #47
Absolutely and they aint done with their caucuses. The pricinct caususes can give us a rhett o rick May 2016 #49
The final breakdown has been available for weeks. annavictorious May 2016 #136
It seems like there is a lot of effort for something LiberalFighter May 2016 #211
That's what's silly. The numbers were reported long ago, as if all the delegates had already pnwmom May 2016 #70
I hate to admit it to you but I have problems with the caucus system. rhett o rick May 2016 #86
Thank you. And -- GOOD GRIEF!!! pnwmom May 2016 #90
We started before noon. I got there at 12:15 and no parking left except in ditches and road sides. rhett o rick May 2016 #92
I think more people would be willing to participate -- I would -- if the meetings weren't so long. pnwmom May 2016 #94
I believe there is a resolution to the State platform suggesting such. Support that at the State rhett o rick May 2016 #99
As per The Stranger annavictorious May 2016 #139
They don't even know how any of this works. annavictorious May 2016 #132
It's a formality annavictorious May 2016 #130
This message was self-deleted by its author eomer May 2016 #13
Fantastic, Thank You Washington State! Go Bernie! appalachiablue May 2016 #15
K & R AzDar May 2016 #25
The Pacific Northwest loves Bernie. Arugula Latte May 2016 #32
Sadly that's probably more true than not. That's probably why the Wash Super-Duper Delegates are rhett o rick May 2016 #52
49 huh? isn't that about 1/4 of the difference to this point? nt silvershadow May 2016 #41
Not if you use regular math. pnwmom May 2016 #55
I don't understand the OP. How did Sanders get more delegates? rhett o rick May 2016 #212
depends on whether you look at delegates officially awarded or projected to be awarded. magical thyme May 2016 #56
You're not accounting for the votes Hillary got in WA or in Guam. pnwmom May 2016 #63
49 is not the number that matters. What matters is the net delegates. Thor_MN May 2016 #93
Well they are neck and neck (irregularities withstanding) nt silvershadow May 2016 #96
No, they are not. Thor_MN May 2016 #104
Oh I was talking about the unresolved disenfranchisement. I see what you did there, though. nt silvershadow May 2016 #105
Here, I found what I was looking for: silvershadow May 2016 #106
You are still forgetting those pesky superdelegates, who despite your hopes and dreams, do count. Thor_MN May 2016 #116
Those delegates have been calculated into the totals for months. annavictorious May 2016 #145
k and r nt Rebkeh May 2016 #44
Those have been included in most counts for a long time. Zynx May 2016 #76
For what it's worth it made Yahoo's front page via the AP PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #78
Well there it is MFM008 May 2016 #89
I believe this article is completely bogus. IMO and I have been participating as a precinct rhett o rick May 2016 #97
I live in Seattle and just got may ballot today! scscholar May 2016 #101
It looks like the tactic is to keep Bernie supporters from sending in ballots Kalidurga May 2016 #103
WA voters passed an initiative to require primary elections some years ago strategery blunder May 2016 #119
Thanks scscholar May 2016 #123
You're welcome strategery blunder May 2016 #124
KnR, magical thyme! Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #140
This result may not have affected Hillary's lead as these numbers LuvLoogie May 2016 #148
Go Bernie Go!! LovingA2andMI May 2016 #151
Exit Polls Show Fraud billhicks76 May 2016 #170
If she is one delegate ahead MFM008 May 2016 #181
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #187
All the primaries and caucuses should be reevaluated emsimon33 May 2016 #196
Great news. So much for his winning streak being 'over'. It's not. Betty Karlson May 2016 #197
Go here.... Adrahil May 2016 #223
kick warrprayer May 2016 #216
It sounds wonderful but the articles are total crap. Washington hasn't elected rhett o rick May 2016 #218
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sanders awarded 49 more W...»Reply #182