Latest Breaking News

ReRe

(12,189 posts)

185. It was $27...

Reply to jmowreader (Reply #184)

Sun May 8, 2016, 01:25 AM

May 2016

... I tripled it and sent it right back.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

231 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sanders awarded 49 more Washington state delegates [View all] magical thyme May 2016 OP

Heh. Watch the MSM ignore it ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #1

so technically even with Guam PatrynXX May 2016 #9

And now she has moved from 92% of the delegates she needs to 93%. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #59

Your Candidate Is In Bed With The Bush Family billhicks76 May 2016 #77

Hillary Clinton is a diplomat, like Ted Kennedy was. If she can find a way to work across the aisle, pnwmom May 2016 #83

"I knew Ted Kennedy"... ReRe May 2016 #87

As I said, things have deteriorated since crossing the aisle was the norm. We'd be better off pnwmom May 2016 #88

Hillary certainly knows how to cross the aisle and join with Republicans. bvar22 May 2016 #95

And Hillary has more than 12 million votes and 1700 pledged delegates. And Bernie does not. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #98

...and exactly WHAT does THAT have to do with your advocacy for bvar22 May 2016 #107

Dubya had more votes than Kerry lbrtbell May 2016 #108

SNAP and double SNAP Silver_Witch May 2016 #133

Debating the flaws and virtues of the candidates now is beside the point. pnwmom May 2016 #194

Funny how that is, where you're okay, how those laserhaas May 2016 #114

Bernie has flip flopped, too. He was against the Brady bill, now he's for it. pnwmom May 2016 #120

"And Hillary has more than 12 million votes and 1700 pledged delegates. And Bernie does not. n/t" LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #192

This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #202

lmfao retrowire May 2016 #206

+1 ! FailureToCommunicate May 2016 #113

Preach it! Silver_Witch May 2016 #134

hmmmm sheshe2 May 2016 #182

TPPillary certainly does. forest444 May 2016 #213

We agree on something!!! Yeah. How's that for crossing the aisle? ;-) eom ReRe May 2016 #111

😎 laserhaas May 2016 #115

What is that, laserhaas? ReRe May 2016 #122

Just a smiley face and thumb up laserhaas May 2016 #143

Ha! ReRe May 2016 #164

Nope Joe swore off stogies laserhaas May 2016 #190

I Actually Enjoy Your Comments billhicks76 May 2016 #118

You don't cross the aisle to people who want you destroyed.... Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #146

Bernie has worked across the aisle on his opposition pnwmom May 2016 #161

Because they will be destroyed back home if they are seen with her. Spitfire of ATJ May 2016 #162

Teddy was a drunk that killed national health care reform Buzz cook May 2016 #195

The person you describe... ReRe May 2016 #198

She's already crossed the aisle. She needs to find a way to work back across the aisle. n/t cui bono May 2016 #141

True that! mdbl May 2016 #199

Hillary Courting Bush Donors As Of 2 Days Ago billhicks76 May 2016 #229

I agree, good or bad, Hillary will be able to work with the Republicans NWCorona May 2016 #159

She's asking for the votes of anyone who wants a SANE President. That sounds like a low bar, pnwmom May 2016 #160

If Hillary was just asking for Republican votes I wouldn't have a problem. NWCorona May 2016 #163

HRC is at the top of a hostile takeover of the Democratic Party. grasswire May 2016 #217

She gained 4 in Guam, he got 3 - TBF May 2016 #200

The MSM should ignore it. FarPoint May 2016 #12

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #17

Nickels and dimes? Naw she holds out for the big bucks ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #18

win ^ n/t RazBerryBeret May 2016 #68

Well I mean really, it's what they offered.......how can she refuse SammyWinstonJack May 2016 #150

Keep telling yourself that! Chasstev365 May 2016 #27

Well, if you didn't have a big Hillary Clinton logo on your post, your opinion bjo59 May 2016 #28

I know.... FarPoint May 2016 #58

Wow. Advocating against a free press? Coventina May 2016 #35

Oh, on the contrary... FarPoint May 2016 #40

Reporting on our national elections is extremely important. Coventina May 2016 #43

No it's not... FarPoint May 2016 #57

You are confusing your personal value system with the duty of the press in our democracy. Coventina May 2016 #60

You need to keep up with the news lbrtbell May 2016 #109

Right On!! LovingA2andMI May 2016 #152

It has always been U.S. with him laserhaas May 2016 #191

Funny, as hell.... (Also. you were blocked --- let's take care of that again) LovingA2andMI May 2016 #203

Uh... ReRe May 2016 #168

Kind and considerate ReRe laserhaas May 2016 #215

Jeee wilikers, and here I thought 'you guys' were into .....math. pangaia May 2016 #38

And the reason you can say that so... ReRe May 2016 #110

A...Men...ReRe laserhaas May 2016 #147

If it's not Trump, it's not news, apparently. nt valerief May 2016 #79

if elected, he would be the first president to be completely ignored by MSM yurbud May 2016 #224

Considering the ballot count isn't until the 24th... scscholar May 2016 #230

KnR for more Sanders delegates! Woot! n/t 99th_Monkey May 2016 #2

Cool laserhaas May 2016 #5

Kicketty Kickin' Faux pas May 2016 #3

Nate Silvers annavictorious May 2016 #4

The importance of Hillary's win in Guam stopbush May 2016 #6

The importance of Hillary's win.... anywhere... AlbertCat May 2016 #19

Bitter much? rusty fender May 2016 #23

Bitter much? AlbertCat May 2016 #61

hmmmm puffy socks May 2016 #36

So far, she's had about 12.6 million votes; Bernie 9.5 million muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #48

By winning in the electoral college. JDPriestly May 2016 #65

I credit Susan Sarandon annavictorious May 2016 #125

Post removed Post removed May 2016 #142

Millions fewer want Bernie for President. nt pnwmom May 2016 #53

Millions more would have wanted Bernie.... ReRe May 2016 #117

Many candidates annavictorious May 2016 #126

I never thought much of that, but... ReRe May 2016 #127

Not fact jmowreader May 2016 #154

Oh Gawdddddd...... ReRe May 2016 #175

It's over. jmowreader May 2016 #178

Yeah, it's over alright... ReRe May 2016 #183

So...how much WAS your check from Revolution Messaging this month? jmowreader May 2016 #184

It was $27... ReRe May 2016 #185

Wait a minute... ReRe May 2016 #186

Happy to jmowreader May 2016 #188

Bernie Sanders didn't.... ReRe May 2016 #189

If Hillary's supporters did the same thing to a Bernie rally, you'd blame her jmowreader May 2016 #193

Well... ReRe May 2016 #225

Latinos are obviously not in lockstep for the Clinton Machine... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #201

Agreed! n/t ReRe May 2016 #226

Do you REALLY want your President or Candidate to have the power to... bvar22 May 2016 #221

Sovereign citizens like you disgust me jmowreader May 2016 #227

must by "controlled" by a "central authority". bvar22 May 2016 #228

OK... ReRe May 2016 #231

Yeah. I call bullshit. stopbush May 2016 #82

I guess every first lady had the position "handed" to her annavictorious May 2016 #121

The fine Senator remained silent when Geronimoe May 2016 #137

and Hillary needs to win 73% of remaining delegates to reach 2383 magical thyme May 2016 #51

Bernie needs 97%. That sound doable to you? nt pnwmom May 2016 #62

No she doesn't. The 522 superdelegates DO count towards 2383. beastie boy May 2016 #71

not yet Ed Suspicious May 2016 #157

Oh yes they do. Today. beastie boy May 2016 #166

Do you have even a passing familiarity with the truth? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #167

Let me see... the truth is what you wish things would be... beastie boy May 2016 #169

Have the super delegates already cast their votes at the convention? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #171

Have the pledged delegates already cast their votes? beastie boy May 2016 #173

No. That 73% would be pledged delegates only. stopbush May 2016 #81

hello? I wrote 73% based on pledged delegates and that neither can win w/out supers magical thyme May 2016 #135

Yawn. stopbush May 2016 #138

Sad that you can't let it play out without being a jerk. Ed Suspicious May 2016 #172

Sad that Sanders can't see that it already has played out. stopbush May 2016 #204

Bottom line: No one needs to make it on pledged delegates alone. Thor_MN May 2016 #91

Hillary will win - no problem - on the first ballot... reACTIONary May 2016 #155

Then what the fuck are you worried about? Ed Suspicious May 2016 #158

Ed, thanks.. reACTIONary May 2016 #165

Silver's ..the man always amazed Bernie does better laserhaas May 2016 #7

Always? annavictorious May 2016 #8

Which is more inane...my thinking Sanders has a chance laserhaas May 2016 #10

We worked quite hard here in MA for Hillary Chico Man May 2016 #22

The fact that you are working hard for a friend of my well known adversary laserhaas May 2016 #24

Endearing you isn't the goal Chico Man May 2016 #33

Endearing EVERY voter is the goal of a volunteer lbrtbell May 2016 #112

That's completely unrealistic Chico Man May 2016 #177

Why do people work so hard for a power-loving liar? pangaia May 2016 #39

Why have you subscribed to the vast right wing conspiracy of Hillary haters? Chico Man May 2016 #42

I have not subscribed to anything. I do not hate her. pangaia May 2016 #50

"Power loving liar"? Chico Man May 2016 #64

No,, she loves power, and she repeatedly lies.. Just facts. pangaia May 2016 #67

that's your opinion Chico Man May 2016 #74

Stop putting words in my mouth and assuming my thoughts. pangaia May 2016 #149

Boo hoo Chico Man May 2016 #174

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R May 2016 #153

I would wager they are not liberal nor progressive Chico Man May 2016 #176

You just lost a wager. pangaia May 2016 #179

Got me Chico Man May 2016 #180

This message was self-deleted by its author Matt_R May 2016 #222

That's the answer to every criticism Clinton faces Scootaloo May 2016 #85

You could also ask, why do people work so hard for a hippie-commie-blowhard? pnwmom May 2016 #69

He is not a hippie. He is not a commie and he is not a blowhard. pangaia May 2016 #72

In your opinion. That's what the ads would have said in the general, if he'd gotten that far. n/t pnwmom May 2016 #73

They refusing to see that's the reality. laserhaas May 2016 #144

Good on you. mahina May 2016 #80

Got that right. snort May 2016 #100

What a ridiculously sexist thing to say. annavictorious May 2016 #128

I haven't been following the math............ mrmpa May 2016 #14

Sorry, super delegates are not going to switch their vote to Bernie leftofcool May 2016 #16

That will never change the fact that most of America ChairmanAgnostic May 2016 #21

Ya mean the Super's that were committed before anyone else entered the race laserhaas May 2016 #26

Super delegates shouldn't even be voting unless a convention emergency occurs. Lars39 May 2016 #34

The DNC is bought and paid for greymouse May 2016 #20

Sad state of affairs laserhaas May 2016 #29

Super delegates vote at the same time as the pledged delegates. annavictorious May 2016 #131

+100 !! Contested convention? What a .... reACTIONary May 2016 #156

Sanders could have run as an independent. annavictorious May 2016 #129

Unless a deal has been made to keep her in line laserhaas May 2016 #31

It won't be six months, but definitely before the mid-terms... truebrit71 May 2016 #54

Hoping to see is one thing. Actually seeing is another. stopbush May 2016 #84

I'm not seeing it... mrmpa May 2016 #102

Threats from the Sanders zealots that they won't vote for Hillary stopbush May 2016 #205

With all due respect.......... mrmpa May 2016 #207

So, you call the Obama presidency "going through the motions?" stopbush May 2016 #208

No I don't............. mrmpa May 2016 #209

So what was the point of your post #207? stopbush May 2016 #210

In toto......... mrmpa May 2016 #214

Ha! Interesting to have a Sanders supporter claiming others stopbush May 2016 #219

Last I saw & read, DU is a progressive, liberal Democrat site.......... mrmpa May 2016 #220

Before the vote Nate posted that he expected Bernie would be stronger than the polls showed pnwmom May 2016 #66

Keep the good news coming! Thanks for posting. Surya Gayatri May 2016 #37

So has The Green Papers LiberalFighter May 2016 #45

of course it didn't cost her $2M or 2cents. Between the massive free press, Superpac spending, not magical thyme May 2016 #46

Who is Nate SilverS? JackRiddler May 2016 #75

I haven't read the article but Washington the State hasn't elected their state delegates yet. rhett o rick May 2016 #11

Delegates and Caucuser - We Don't Need No Stinking Delegates & Caucusers laserhaas May 2016 #30

Don't they go by the results of the caucuses? LiberalFighter May 2016 #47

Absolutely and they aint done with their caucuses. The pricinct caususes can give us a rhett o rick May 2016 #49

The final breakdown has been available for weeks. annavictorious May 2016 #136

It seems like there is a lot of effort for something LiberalFighter May 2016 #211

That's what's silly. The numbers were reported long ago, as if all the delegates had already pnwmom May 2016 #70

I hate to admit it to you but I have problems with the caucus system. rhett o rick May 2016 #86

Thank you. And -- GOOD GRIEF!!! pnwmom May 2016 #90

We started before noon. I got there at 12:15 and no parking left except in ditches and road sides. rhett o rick May 2016 #92

I think more people would be willing to participate -- I would -- if the meetings weren't so long. pnwmom May 2016 #94

I believe there is a resolution to the State platform suggesting such. Support that at the State rhett o rick May 2016 #99

As per The Stranger annavictorious May 2016 #139

They don't even know how any of this works. annavictorious May 2016 #132

It's a formality annavictorious May 2016 #130

This message was self-deleted by its author eomer May 2016 #13

Fantastic, Thank You Washington State! Go Bernie! appalachiablue May 2016 #15

K & R AzDar May 2016 #25

The Pacific Northwest loves Bernie. Arugula Latte May 2016 #32

Sadly that's probably more true than not. That's probably why the Wash Super-Duper Delegates are rhett o rick May 2016 #52

49 huh? isn't that about 1/4 of the difference to this point? nt silvershadow May 2016 #41

Not if you use regular math. pnwmom May 2016 #55

I don't understand the OP. How did Sanders get more delegates? rhett o rick May 2016 #212

depends on whether you look at delegates officially awarded or projected to be awarded. magical thyme May 2016 #56

You're not accounting for the votes Hillary got in WA or in Guam. pnwmom May 2016 #63

49 is not the number that matters. What matters is the net delegates. Thor_MN May 2016 #93

Well they are neck and neck (irregularities withstanding) nt silvershadow May 2016 #96

No, they are not. Thor_MN May 2016 #104

Oh I was talking about the unresolved disenfranchisement. I see what you did there, though. nt silvershadow May 2016 #105

Here, I found what I was looking for: silvershadow May 2016 #106

You are still forgetting those pesky superdelegates, who despite your hopes and dreams, do count. Thor_MN May 2016 #116

Those delegates have been calculated into the totals for months. annavictorious May 2016 #145

k and r nt Rebkeh May 2016 #44

Those have been included in most counts for a long time. Zynx May 2016 #76

For what it's worth it made Yahoo's front page via the AP PoliticalMalcontent May 2016 #78

Well there it is MFM008 May 2016 #89

I believe this article is completely bogus. IMO and I have been participating as a precinct rhett o rick May 2016 #97

I live in Seattle and just got may ballot today! scscholar May 2016 #101

It looks like the tactic is to keep Bernie supporters from sending in ballots Kalidurga May 2016 #103

WA voters passed an initiative to require primary elections some years ago strategery blunder May 2016 #119

Thanks scscholar May 2016 #123

You're welcome strategery blunder May 2016 #124

KnR, magical thyme! Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #140

This result may not have affected Hillary's lead as these numbers LuvLoogie May 2016 #148

Go Bernie Go!! LovingA2andMI May 2016 #151

Exit Polls Show Fraud billhicks76 May 2016 #170

If she is one delegate ahead MFM008 May 2016 #181

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #187

All the primaries and caucuses should be reevaluated emsimon33 May 2016 #196

Great news. So much for his winning streak being 'over'. It's not. Betty Karlson May 2016 #197

Go here.... Adrahil May 2016 #223

kick warrprayer May 2016 #216

It sounds wonderful but the articles are total crap. Washington hasn't elected rhett o rick May 2016 #218