Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Emma Watson named in Panama Papers [View all]Bad Dog
(2,044 posts)13. Bet she does a Jimmy Carr.
And apololgises to her fans and leaves this particular scheme. She probably won't have a go at Cameron though.
Jimmy Carr has said it would be morally wrong to pass comment on another individuals tax affairs echoing words used by David Cameron when he publicly condemned the comedian over his tax affairs.
Four years ago Carr was singled out for criticism by the Prime Minister amid uproar over the use of complex financial schemes designed to minimise tax.
On Friday, without actually naming Mr Cameron, Carr hit back.
I'm going to keep it classy," he posted on his Twitter account. "It would be morally wrong and hypocritical to comment on another individuals tax affairs."
An investigation by the Times in 2012 exposed a single Jersey-based scheme that sheltered £168m a year from the taxman. The comedian was understood to have been the largest beneficiary of the legal tax avoidance scheme, which reportedly enabled members to pay income rates as low as one per cent.
The Prime Minister, speaking during a trip to Mexico in 2012, said to ITV: "I think some of these schemes and I think particularly of the Jimmy Carr scheme I have had time to read about and I just think this is completely wrong.
"People work hard, they pay their taxes, they save up to go to one of his shows. They buy the tickets. He is taking the money from those tickets and he, as far as I can see, is putting all of that into some very dodgy tax avoiding schemes.
"That is wrong. There is nothing wrong with people planning their tax affairs to invest in their pension and plan for their retirement that sort of tax management is fine. But some of these schemes we have seen are quite frankly morally wrong.
"The government is acting by looking at a general anti-avoidance law but we do need to make progress on this. It is not fair on hardworking people who do the right thing and pay their taxes to see these sorts of scams taking place."
After Mr Carr's tax affairs were revealed, he apologised to his fans saying he "made a terrible error of judgement". He added that he was no longer involved in the tax shelter scheme .
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/david-cameron-offshore-fund-jimmy-carr-says-it-would-be-morally-wrong-to-comment-on-tax-another-a6975601.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh I bet is was for privacy reasons, alright. Surely she is one of highest paid of her profession.
silvershadow
May 2016
#4
Tens of thousands of companies avoid hundreds of millions … in tax through the …“Delaware loophole”.
w4rma
May 2016
#68
No. You obfuscate the facts. You cherry pick one fact, and pretend others don't also exist.
w4rma
May 2016
#70
See post #11 that I inadvertently addressed to someone else instead of you NT
Ex Lurker
May 2016
#19
If she was using that phony corporation to avoid paying her share of taxes it is everybodys business
GummyBearz
May 2016
#71
yup, no big deal, just avoiding to pay taxes. no big deal. move along nothing to see.
Javaman
May 2016
#18
I know, lol, it sounds goofy, but "protecting assets" has been a marketing strategy
closeupready
May 2016
#35
It's still perfectly legal to have offshore accounts, you're just required to report them to the IRS
Xithras
May 2016
#46
I had to look up Emma Watson to see who she was. I wouldn't recognize her if I tripped over her. nt
valerief
May 2016
#22
Emma Watson is a good soul. I'll take her at her word, unless I specifically find out otherwise.
w4rma
May 2016
#25
Considering that it's legal and that she would support making it illegal, I don't see the hypocrisy.
w4rma
May 2016
#36
You're not making any sense, Democat. Would you murder the 1% down to the last woman and child?
w4rma
May 2016
#42
Keep digging that hole for yourself. I've been a member of DU since right after the (s)election.(nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#63
Finally: A reason to care about the Panama Papers leak—attractive people you know from your teevee
w4rma
May 2016
#65
They still never found who 'leaked' the banks records to the "journalist consortium"?
Sunlei
May 2016
#26
some of the account names are billionaire Russians the USA placed financial sanctions on last yr.
Sunlei
May 2016
#34
I'm not liking excuse V1.0, maybe the next one will be more convincing
MowCowWhoHow III
May 2016
#40