Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. But wait! There's more!
Thu May 12, 2016, 06:26 PM
May 2016
Even though the District government gets roughly three-quarters of its $13 billion budget from local funds, Congress treats it like a federal agency, which means it can't start spending the money until it gets the OK from Capitol Hill.

That requirement was spelled out in the 1973 bill that gave District residents the power to elect their own mayor and council. City leaders tried to change it through a novel legal strategy, putting a referendum on the ballot to amend the city charter. The referendum was approved overwhelmingly in 2013. It was challenged in court, but after a judge ruled in the city's favor earlier this year, Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser said the city would no longer submit its budget to Congress. A separate legal challenge is still spending (sic).

The arcane issue of how and when the city can spend its money is a big deal to advocates of self-rule, who see Congressional review as an unnecessary intrusion into local affairs. The city government has been forced to close during federal shutdowns even though it had plenty of money to continue operating.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Congress may block DC gov...»Reply #1