Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(2,329 posts)

3. Shouldn't he answer for his claims? If the deal was constructed on a lie

Mon May 16, 2016, 07:11 PM

May 2016

don't we have the right to know why? If it wasn't, shouldn't we get an answer as to why he made his claim?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

White House aide refuses to testify [View all] Press Virginia May 2016 OP

I guess they figure the people have no need to know any facts Angry Dragon May 2016 #1

It's a fishing expedition. Lose-Lose. n/t cigsandcoffee May 2016 #2

Shouldn't he answer for his claims? If the deal was constructed on a lie Press Virginia May 2016 #3

His claim, alledgedly, was that he manipulated public opinion. BillZBubb May 2016 #5

An explanation, either to congress or by the President Press Virginia May 2016 #6

Yeah I really believe the republicans are after any truth. Kingofalldems May 2016 #7

A presser by President Obama would head it off Press Virginia May 2016 #12

He shouldn't have been yapping in public. That was foolish. BillZBubb May 2016 #4

President Obama could give a presser and be done with it Press Virginia May 2016 #13

Your concern is noted Democat May 2016 #11

Yeah, nobody said anything close to what you're implying Press Virginia May 2016 #14

Since when can you refuse to testify to Congress? fasttense May 2016 #16