Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
2. as I posted elsewhere
Tue May 17, 2016, 02:46 PM
May 2016

U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth ruled on March 29 that “where there is evidence of government wrong-doing and bad faith, as here, limited discovery is appropriate, even though it is exceedingly rare in FOIA cases.”

And so the process of discovery continues.

5/16/2016

Judicial Watch announced today that it has filed a proposed order for discovery with a federal court that seeks the testimony of Hillary Clinton about her use of non-state.gov email account(s) for official State Department business. Judicial Watch’s discovery plan also seeks the testimony of Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s former chief of staff; and Jacob “Jake” Sullivan, former senior advisor and deputy chief of staff, as well as other current and former State Department officials. Judicial Watch proposes the testimony take place over 12 weeks.

Today’s filing comes in a July 2014 Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit seeking records and communications in the Secretary’s Office related to the since discredited talking points used by then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to describe the nature of the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attack ( Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:14-cv-01242)).

Clinton’s proposed testimony would cover the search in response to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request and, according to the filing:

searches of the Office of the Secretary for emails relating to the September 12, 2012 Benghazi attack and its aftermath, including searches for the Accountability Review Board, congressional inquiries, other FOIA requests, and the preparation of Secretary Clinton’s testimony before Congress on January 23, 2013;

the State Department’s policies, practices, procedures and/or actions (or lack thereof) to secure, inventory, and/or account for all records, including emails, of Secretary Clinton, prior to termination of employment with the State Department; and

the use of non-state.gov email account(s) to conduct official State Department business by Secretary Clinton and other officials and staff in the Office of the Secretary;

Judicial Watch’s other proposed witnesses include:

Cheryl Mills
Jacob Sullivan
Lauren Jiloty, former special assistant to Clinton
Monica Hanley, former Clinton aide
Clarence Finney, State Department records management official
30(b)(6) witness(es) (designated State Department witness(es) who testify on behalf of the agency)

Judicial Watch also seeks documents about the State Department’s Benghazi document responses and the handling of non-State.gov emails of Clinton and other top State officials, in particular:

All documents that concern or relate to the processing of any and all searches of the Office of the Secretary for emails relating to the September 11, 2012 Benghazi attack and its aftermath, including but not limited to:
searches for records for the Accountability Review Board;
searches in response to congressional inquiries (including requests from the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform dated September 20, 2012, October 2, 2012, October 29, 2012, and November 1, 2012);
searches in preparation of Secretary Clinton’s testimony before Congress on January 23, 2013; and
searches in response to FOIA requests, including but not limited to the FOIA request submitted by Plaintiff in this case.

Such documents would include the tasking, tracking and reporting records for such searches. Forms DS-1748 and any “search slips,” “search tasker,” “search details,” shall also be considered responsive.

All communications that concern or relate to the processing of all searches referenced in Document Request No. 1 above, including directions or guidance about how and where to conduct the searches, whether and how to search Secretary Clinton’s email, and issues, problems, or questions concerning the searches and/or search results.

All records that concern or relate to the State Department’s policies, practices, procedures and/or actions (or lack thereof) to secure, inventory, and/or account for all records, including emails, of Secretary Clinton, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin and Jacob Sullivan prior to their termination of employment with the State Department.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Promoting right wing witch hunts on DU, I see Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #1
Show me where I'm promoting witch hunts? NWCorona May 2016 #3
wow... Javaman May 2016 #4
Can't fix some things around here. JudyM May 2016 #22
Two judges - at least one with some appointment by Bill Clinton Jarqui May 2016 #6
But, but, it reflects negatively on Her! Only possible explanation is a witch hunt! JudyM May 2016 #11
Of course "conservatives" would never do such a thing Cary May 2016 #14
I'm farther from the right than you are, my friend. We all deserve the truth because yes, it matters JudyM May 2016 #16
You know nothing about me Cary May 2016 #17
As a Clinton supporter and based on your posts you are positively more conservative than I. JudyM May 2016 #18
Like I said you know nothing Cary May 2016 #19
You know zilch about me, apparently. Labeling all Bernie supporters radical? How very enlightened. JudyM May 2016 #20
I see Cary May 2016 #21
That is a key part of the problem. It's not going away before the election. Jarqui May 2016 #15
Clinton appointed judge Ash_F May 2016 #7
See no evil... JudyM May 2016 #12
as I posted elsewhere grasswire May 2016 #2
An exceedingly rare example of bad faith and wrong doing. Nothing of concern here, though. JudyM May 2016 #24
Not a word about the FBI "investigating" Clinton, even from the WSJ. They aren't, she isn't. George II May 2016 #5
Best to find out now, rather than waiting months. Duval May 2016 #8
I have heard that exact line hundreds of times from GOP Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #9
Really? Duval May 2016 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author bluecoat_fan May 2016 #23
Freedom of Information Act Babel_17 May 2016 #13
Kick silvershadow May 2016 #25
So can this civil suit lead to criminal charges? trudyco May 2016 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Interviews in Civil Suit ...»Reply #2