Interviews in Civil Suit Over Hillary Clinton Email Server to Begin This Week

[Jarqui]

6. Two judges - at least one with some appointment by Bill Clinton

have decided to hear this testimony because the case and evidence justified it.

“Where there is evidence of government wrongdoing and bad faith, as here, limited discovery is appropriate, even though it is exceedingly rare in FOIA cases,” Judge Lambert

http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000153-c30e-d9f0-a173-f7efb4660000
Court Order published by Politico

Judge Sullivan effectively agreed with him in a different FOIA case per CNN:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/04/politics/hillary-clinton-email-state-department/

Sullivan acknowledged that it is unusual to grant discovery in a Freedom of Information case but he said discovery should be permitted, "when a plaintiff raises a sufficient question as to the agency's good faith in processing documents in response to a FOIA request."

To me, there's a lot more going on here. Can't brush this off as a mere right wing witch hunt. These are courts of law. Evidence has to be provided to support these judges making these rulings. And it's not just one judge. It's two arriving at a similar place. (and about 36 other cases progressing against them)

This is not merely a witch hunt or some media hit piece. These are court cases where Hillary and the State department may be on the wrong side of the law. If the courts find against them, there's more there than merely a right wing witch hunt.