Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Javaman

(65,537 posts)
18. what no cruz? I'm shocked! LOL
Wed May 18, 2016, 02:56 PM
May 2016

Trump Asked About Giving Cruz Supreme Court Nomination. Here's His Response.

Some have suggested that Donald Trump could go a long way in healing the divide in the Republican Party by agreeing to nominate Ted Cruz to the Supreme Court. When asked by the Daily Mail about the move on Monday, Trump wouldn't give a hard answer, but clearly signaled he wasn't a big fan of the idea. The reason: Cruz's "tough temperament."

Trump has announced that he will be providing a list of a dozen or more potential Supreme Court judges to replace deceased Justice Antonin Scalia, names he's turned to the Heritage Foundation for help in selecting. With Trump getting closer to locking up his presidential bid, some have offered Cruz as a wise and potentially unifying selection. Trump is clearly not convinced.

"I don't know, I'd have to think about it," Trump said when asked about choosing Cruz.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/5395/trump-asked-about-giving-cruz-supreme-court-james-barrett

---------------------------------------------

I guess he didn't think long about it. LOL

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, and no. ck4829 May 2016 #1
other links CurtEastPoint May 2016 #2
The thing I don't like about linking to ABC is that mahatmakanejeeves May 2016 #4
Yeah, I hate autoplay, too. CurtEastPoint May 2016 #5
Those drive me nuts! PatSeg May 2016 #8
1. Robert Bork 2. Ted Nugent 3. Rush Limbaugh 4. Sean Hannity Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #3
Its improper to release this kind of short list until he has the job. Gomez163 May 2016 #6
Seems like a PR move from not releasing his actual tax forms yet. toddwv May 2016 #11
"Supreme Court nominations are not supposed to be politicized like this" yellowcanine May 2016 #15
It really is arrogant and presumptuous bucolic_frolic May 2016 #16
Always have been... always will be... TipTok May 2016 #22
Doesn't matter who it is. Dems should boycott any choice for 4 years. Let the next President choose kairos12 May 2016 #7
If Obama doesn't get to pick a justice this year, neither does the next Republican Democat May 2016 #9
Except that the Vichy wing of the party would immediately Kelvin Mace May 2016 #10
The silver lining ... BlueMTexpat May 2016 #12
Palin for VP Yupster May 2016 #28
Or vice versa! BlueMTexpat May 2016 #29
Steve Collorton "Associate independent counsel, Whitewater investigation, 1995-1996" Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #13
..... LiberalLovinLug May 2016 #14
In other words the reincarnations of 47of74 May 2016 #17
what no cruz? I'm shocked! LOL Javaman May 2016 #18
I'm actually surprised MosheFeingold May 2016 #24
Do we know anything about any of them? jwirr May 2016 #19
Well, they make Antonin Scalia look like a granola-fueled hippie jmowreader May 2016 #23
One of Donald Trump's Supreme Court picks has mocked him on Twitter BiminiTwisted May 2016 #20
I'm betting he never even heard of any of these people secondwind May 2016 #21
Lol. True. I can't believe trump is bowing down to the conservatives on the yeoman6987 May 2016 #27
Shoot, why not directly elect Supreme Court justices at this point? TomCADem May 2016 #25
He's not going to be president so he won't be able to pick them Rosa Luxemburg May 2016 #26
It would be funny to see how a Trump nomination of Willett played out muriel_volestrangler May 2016 #30
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump unveils list of 11 ...»Reply #18