Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

She was not a whistle blower. hack89 May 2016 #1
Reporters Without Borders disagrees with you. Stryst May 2016 #6
Words have meaning, especially in a legal context. hack89 May 2016 #7
Sounds like a pretext. forest444 May 2016 #8
Laws are not pretexts hack89 May 2016 #9
No...it's actual law. Had Manning gone to Sanders or Kucinich, she would have been bulletproof. nt msanthrope May 2016 #12
Instead of reporting it, he released it. Drahthaardogs May 2016 #44
Like releasing it to WaPo or WSJ would have resulted in "real" investigative journalism. laserhaas May 2016 #56
A security clearance is no joke. Drahthaardogs May 2016 #57
Neither is cover up of mass murder by chicken chit ships in the sky.... laserhaas May 2016 #59
Exactly. nt msanthrope May 2016 #66
are you suggesting that ONLY those already with legal protection in US are whistleblowers? cloudythescribbler May 2016 #16
I blame Assange hack89 May 2016 #19
Never too late. secondwind May 2016 #2
Well anyone convicted under the UCMJ gets 2 automatic appeals NobodyHere May 2016 #3
Chelsea's just trying to get into the news... Blue_Tires May 2016 #4
I wouldnt be willing to wager any money on this appeal working. cstanleytech May 2016 #5
Seems like a lot of BS to me. Yo_Mama May 2016 #10
Chelsea is a political prisoner. Agony May 2016 #11
Disgruntled worker and piss poor criminal maybe... TipTok May 2016 #18
No....appeals are never too late. I actually think this was a very harsh sentence. nt msanthrope May 2016 #13
+1 joshcryer May 2016 #49
Sentanced too harshly? The Rosenbergs might disagree. FLPanhandle May 2016 #14
Oh, you mean exposing criminal wrongdoing is like the Rosenburgs? askeptic May 2016 #21
Sorry Chelsea, Bradly dis the crime calguy May 2016 #15
What an ass... TipTok May 2016 #17
sensitive information?...like....crimes? askeptic May 2016 #22
Couple of things... TipTok May 2016 #23
1) Thanks for pointing out the flaws in our justice system Ash_F May 2016 #25
Was there a point? TipTok May 2016 #26
See post #24 Ash_F May 2016 #29
More deflection... TipTok May 2016 #31
Chelsea Manning is a hero for exposing these and other crimes. Ash_F May 2016 #37
Feel free to address the points made.... TipTok May 2016 #38
You don't think exposing child sex trafficking is heroic? Ash_F May 2016 #40
If that was all he had exposed... TipTok May 2016 #41
Crimes were exposed. Whether they remain to be prosecuted is irrelevent askeptic May 2016 #27
The point stands... TipTok May 2016 #28
yep - mine too. The private gets years and the General gets probation askeptic May 2016 #30
Intent plays a large role in our legal system... TipTok May 2016 #32
re-read my post. He knew what he was doing. Contradicting yourself askeptic May 2016 #33
I probably shouldn't get into this, BUT MH1 May 2016 #35
I hear ya, but Gates himself said it was not a disastrous breach askeptic May 2016 #36
Why would you think those choices... TipTok May 2016 #43
sentenced to decades in prison for the crime of disclosing truthful information to the public? askeptic May 2016 #20
Manning exposed child sex trafficking by a Virginia based private military contractor Ash_F May 2016 #24
Manning could be paroled in 2021. Release before then seems unlikely. struggle4progress May 2016 #34
All that matters here ..is intent...all the naysayers tech objects laserhaas May 2016 #39
So... TipTok May 2016 #42
Now it is.....Im a whistleblower for 15 years laserhaas May 2016 #45
There are few guarantees in life... TipTok May 2016 #46
Like the war crimes Manning exposed? Octafish May 2016 #47
You'll have to be more specific... TipTok May 2016 #48
Specifics... Octafish May 2016 #50
This Apache video? TipTok May 2016 #51
Mass murder as comedy. Octafish May 2016 #52
You are in your country, surrounded by invaders, revolutionaries and worse; but your guns are a laserhaas May 2016 #55
Do you ever address points made? TipTok May 2016 #58
Do I have to explain everything to you? I don't like those who find mass murder funny. Octafish May 2016 #61
You could start by explaining something... TipTok May 2016 #62
Well stated ^^^^ this - times 1000^^^^ laserhaas May 2016 #54
If they were "innocent civilians" the reporters wouldn't have embedded with them. EX500rider May 2016 #60
Weird seeing hatred for the press on a Democratic site. Octafish May 2016 #64
No hated of anything...but embedding with insurgents in a war zone is inherently dangerous.. EX500rider May 2016 #65
Exactly - 'Octafish' - when is ANY whistleblowing justified, if it is not okay to do so, when murder laserhaas May 2016 #53
The sentence is excessive Benitos May 2016 #63
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Chelsea Manning files app...»Reply #29