Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Chelsea Manning files appeal against 'grossly unfair' 35-year prison sentence [View all]askeptic
(478 posts)30. yep - mine too. The private gets years and the General gets probation
So classified is a BIG DEAL, is it? Except when it's a General named Petraeus. Then it's just "mishandling".
from the Washington Post:
The plea follows a high-profile investigation and prosecution that triggered Petraeuss resignation from the CIA in 2012. As part of an agreement with prosecutors, he admitted that he improperly removed and retained highly sensitive information in eight personal notebooks that he gave the biographer, Paula Broadwell, to read.
When FBI agents confronted him in his CIA office in October 2012, Petraeus said he had never provided classified information to Broadwell, prosecutors said.
Making a false statement to a federal law enforcement agent during an investigation is a felony, a crime punishable by up to five years in prison. On Thursday, Keesler told Petraeus that he had been untruthful and that his behavior constituted a serious lapse of judgment.
The FBI searched Petraeuss house in April 2013 and found the books in an unlocked drawer in his study. The books contained top-secret information that the Justice Department said could cause exceptionally grave damage to national security if disclosed.
That information included code words for secret intelligence programs, identities of covert officers, war strategy and deliberative discussions with the National Security Council.
I wonder which one actually had the most sensitive information? Yeah, we know all about RHIP and "making examples". Research will show many more examples. Rape and murder during war? 3 yrs. A general exposing classified info? wrist-slap. A private exposing crimes and mostly inconsequential classified info? 35 yrs
You go ahead with your self-righteous indignation regardless of the facts.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Chelsea Manning files appeal against 'grossly unfair' 35-year prison sentence [View all]
brooklynite
May 2016
OP
No...it's actual law. Had Manning gone to Sanders or Kucinich, she would have been bulletproof. nt
msanthrope
May 2016
#12
Like releasing it to WaPo or WSJ would have resulted in "real" investigative journalism.
laserhaas
May 2016
#56
are you suggesting that ONLY those already with legal protection in US are whistleblowers?
cloudythescribbler
May 2016
#16
No....appeals are never too late. I actually think this was a very harsh sentence. nt
msanthrope
May 2016
#13
sentenced to decades in prison for the crime of disclosing truthful information to the public?
askeptic
May 2016
#20
Manning exposed child sex trafficking by a Virginia based private military contractor
Ash_F
May 2016
#24
Manning could be paroled in 2021. Release before then seems unlikely.
struggle4progress
May 2016
#34
You are in your country, surrounded by invaders, revolutionaries and worse; but your guns are a
laserhaas
May 2016
#55
Do I have to explain everything to you? I don't like those who find mass murder funny.
Octafish
May 2016
#61
If they were "innocent civilians" the reporters wouldn't have embedded with them.
EX500rider
May 2016
#60
No hated of anything...but embedding with insurgents in a war zone is inherently dangerous..
EX500rider
May 2016
#65