Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Trump Beats Clinton for First Time in Average of Recent Polls [View all]Omaha Steve
(110,868 posts)91. Hard to organize when Walmart is a well known union buster.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/20/us/politics/20walmart.html?_r=0
Snip: Mrs. Clintons six-year tenure as a director of Wal-Mart, the nations largest company, remains a little known chapter in her closely scrutinized career. And it is little known for a reason. Mrs. Clinton rarely, if ever, discusses it, leaving her board membership out of her speeches and off her campaign Web site.
Fellow board members and company executives, who have not spoken publicly about her role at Wal-Mart, say Mrs. Clinton used her position to champion personal causes, like the need for more women in management and a comprehensive environmental program, despite being Wal-Marts only female director, the youngest and arguably the least experienced in business. On other topics, like Wal-Marts vehement anti-unionism, for example, she was largely silent, they said.
Her years on the Wal-Mart board, from 1986 to 1992, gave her an unusual tutorial in the ways of American business a credential that could serve as an antidote to Republican efforts to portray her as an enemy of free markets and an advocate for big government.
But that education came via a company that the Democratic Party and its major ally, organized labor has held up as a model of what is wrong with American business, with both groups accusing it of offering unaffordable health insurance and mistreating its workers.
http://makingchangeatwalmart.org/2014/01/15/feds-walmart-broke-the-law/
Posted by mperry on Jan 15, 2014 in Press Releases, Walmart Watch Blog | 4 Comments
WALMART ILLEGALLY RETALIATED AGAINST WORKERS SPEAKING OUT FOR HIGHER WAGES, AGAINST INCOME INEQUALITY
Sweeping decision by labor board is largest ever complaint against employer
WASHINGTON The National Labor Relations Board issued the largest-ever complaint against Walmart today for breaking federal labor law by violating workers rights. The complaint alleges Walmart illegally fired and disciplined more than 117 workers, including those who went on strike last June to speak out for better jobs.
The NLRB asserts illegal activities in 14 states at 34 stores and shows that company executives conceivedand oversaw implementationof an unlawful retaliation policy for store managers to execute. The complaintthe largest ever against Walmart in both size and scalenames 63 individual store managers and company spokesperson and vice president of communication David Tovars illegal threats made to employees.
Walmart workers, part of the national organization OUR Walmart, have been taking the countrys income inequality head on by standing up for better wages at the countrys largest employer. While the majority of Walmart associates are paid less than $25,000 a year, Walmart makes $17 billion in annual profits and the Waltonsthe richest family in the countryhave a combined wealth of $144.7 billion.
Walmart thinks it can scare us with attacks to keep us from having a real conversation about the poverty wages were paid, said Barbara Collins a fired Walmart worker from Placerville, CA, who is one of the 117 workers named in the complaint. But too much is at stakethe strength of our economy and the security of our familiesto stay silent about why Walmart needs to improve jobs. Now the federal government is confirming what we already know: we have the right to speak out, and Walmart fired me and my coworkers illegally. With a new CEO taking over in a few weeks, we hope that Walmart will take a new direction in listening to associates and the country in the growing calls to improve jobs.
FULL story at link.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
124 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A lot of innocent Iraqis were "rounded up" and murdered. So maybe its true.
liberalnarb
May 2016
#106
So, they think that Trump isn't qualified, but they prefer him over Hillary....
virtualobserver
May 2016
#4
No BS. The question was how Sanders could be losing, with the poll numbers in the OP.
thesquanderer
May 2016
#62
The problem is that independents like Bernie.....and they don't like Hillary......
virtualobserver
May 2016
#16
I suspect this is largely due to the bump he got when Cruz dropped out and that it will fade once
cstanleytech
May 2016
#73
Doesn't mean I'm not voting, but a Giant Douche v. a Turd Sandwich is not much of a choice
Feeling the Bern
May 2016
#12
Bernie Sanders beats Kasich, too. It isn't the landslide win that he has against Trump, though. (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#89
You're delusional, Darb. She's costing us the Presidency and all the down ticket races. (nt)
w4rma
May 2016
#90
Sorry, but did you not recently lock a thread in "LBN" because it was about a poll?
George II
May 2016
#45
Maybe the biggest thing is that both are viewed unfavorably by 57% of people. That is news. She has
thereismore
May 2016
#55
Giving people a voice in the primaries seems like a decent thing to do at this stage.
PoliticalMalcontent
May 2016
#71
It's interesting. A lot of folks did try to join the party this year.
PoliticalMalcontent
May 2016
#77
People have been consistenly recognizing both the positive and negative with Secretary Clinton
Babel_17
May 2016
#75
I am getting pissed. the blacks got a wonerdfultop notch FIRST black president. i have to
pansypoo53219
May 2016
#81
A strong Democratic candidate would be leading 70 to 30, with just the usual diehard
tabasco
May 2016
#105