Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: State Dept. Audit Faults Hillary Clinton in Emails [View all]think
(11,641 posts)7. State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clinton’s email practices
State Dept. inspector general report sharply criticizes Clintons email practices
By Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger May 25 at 10:18 AM
The State Departments independent watchdog has issued a highly critical analysis of Hillary Clintons email practices while running the department, concluding that she failed to seek legal approval for her use of a private email server and that department staff would not have given its blessing because of the security risks in doing so.
The inspector general, in a long awaited review obtained Wednesday by The Washington Post in advance of its publication, found that Clintons use of private email for public business was not an appropriate method of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure federal record laws are followed.
The report says she should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.
The report found that a top Clinton aide was warned in 2010 that the system may not properly preserve records but dismissed those worries, indicating that the system had passed legal muster. But the inspector general said it could not show evidence of a review by legal counsel.
Read more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/state-dept-inspector-general-report-sharply-criticizes-clintons-email-practices/2016/05/25/fc6f8ebc-2275-11e6-aa84-42391ba52c91_story.html?wpisrc=al_alert-COMBO-politics%252Bnation
By Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger May 25 at 10:18 AM
The State Departments independent watchdog has issued a highly critical analysis of Hillary Clintons email practices while running the department, concluding that she failed to seek legal approval for her use of a private email server and that department staff would not have given its blessing because of the security risks in doing so.
The inspector general, in a long awaited review obtained Wednesday by The Washington Post in advance of its publication, found that Clintons use of private email for public business was not an appropriate method of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure federal record laws are followed.
The report says she should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.
The report found that a top Clinton aide was warned in 2010 that the system may not properly preserve records but dismissed those worries, indicating that the system had passed legal muster. But the inspector general said it could not show evidence of a review by legal counsel.
Read more:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/state-dept-inspector-general-report-sharply-criticizes-clintons-email-practices/2016/05/25/fc6f8ebc-2275-11e6-aa84-42391ba52c91_story.html?wpisrc=al_alert-COMBO-politics%252Bnation
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like I noted there are at least three violations that are prosecutable.
Ichingcarpenter
May 2016
#24
Clinton’s actions were not unlawful under either federal records preservation laws or criminal laws
Justice
May 2016
#77
The State Dept report doesn't touch on classified information violations. The IC and FBI reports
leveymg
May 2016
#59
Likely, the Intelligence Community report within days and the FBI report before the Convention
leveymg
May 2016
#65
State Dept did its job appropriately on this without sugarcoating, and as expected by those of us
blm
May 2016
#4
That doesn't change the fact that the system she inherited was determined to be a failure, too.
blm
May 2016
#34
What excuses will be made for Hillary's fuck ups if she manages to win the election?
frylock
May 2016
#44
Not making excuses - and no fan. I am an honest realist who acknowledges factors involved that
blm
May 2016
#50
Still going through the motions. No crimes. No indictments. Sorry, 'Not Hillary' Party. nt
onehandle
May 2016
#19
The only troubling part to me was why she and her team didn't cooperate with the investigation.
DCBob
May 2016
#49
How wonderful to have our Democratic candidate embroiled in this growing scandal during the election
tabasco
May 2016
#48
In any other election, would we be voting for the one under FBI investigation? Lol. nt
phazed0
May 2016
#60
i'm also amazed at how important email security is to progressives all of a sudden
MariaThinks
May 2016
#63
Hillary's handling of classified information was far worse than what Chelsea Manning did
cpwm17
May 2016
#85