Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
59. "...AMA delegates decided to refer this resolution to a committee that would review recent science."
Mon Jun 18, 2012, 12:22 PM
Jun 2012
http://www.rodale.com/ama-conference?page=0,1

AMA conference
Nation's Doctors Want BPA Labeled, and No More Hotdog-Eating Contests

At its annual House of Delegates meeting, the American Medical Association tackled everything from GMOs to airport body scanner safety.

By Emily Main


RODALE NEWS, EMMAUS, PA—As the country's most influential medical society, the American Medical Association (AMA) holds a lot of sway with government officials who decide what is and isn't important when it comes to public health. Last week, the agency concluded its annual House of Delegates meeting, where they themselves decide what health issues need to be addressed.

The 555 members of the AMA's House of Delegates meet every year to vote on policies put forth by doctors and state medical societies covering everything from organizational structure to whether doctors should accept freebies from pharmaceutical companies. Often, agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration refer to the AMA's policies when trying to make decisions on laws and regulations.

You may have heard in the news earlier this week that the group voted, by a 2 to 1 ratio, to support the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the controversial health care bill), which requires that all Americans buy health insurance. It got attention for adopting a new policy to encourage advertising agencies to limit the amount of electronic modification done to photographic images of people to make them appear more attractive, saying that the practice promotes unrealistic expectations of body image in teenagers.

The delegates also made a few other standout decisions that didn't get much press coverage:

<...>

Genetically modified food: Prior to the House of Delegates meetings, both the Illinois and Indiana state medical societies proposed resolutions asking the AMA to support labeling requirements for genetically modified (GM) foods. Also known as GMOs, these foods have been known to increase food allergies, and animal studies have shown that they can hamper fertility, lead to accelerated aging, and possibly promote chronic diseases. Unfortunately, these were two resolutions the AMA delegates didn't adopt. But they didn't reject them, either. AMA policy currently opposes the labeling of GM foods, but the delegates decided to refer this resolution to a committee that would review the recent science on GMOs and decide then whether to change their current position.

<...>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's hard to have symptathy for idiots who attack publically funded research institutes. enki23 May 2012 #1
It's not hare for me. zeemike May 2012 #3
And atuism nuts "feel" that vaccines are evil. So what? enki23 May 2012 #4
No one forces you to take the vaccine zeemike May 2012 #5
I wasn't aware "public funded institutions" were such a monolith. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #7
It doesn't kill aphids - it's like an aphid 'alarm' phermone muriel_volestrangler May 2012 #27
Plants produce all kinds of defensive chemicals. Scientists study them for effects on human health. yellowcanine May 2012 #49
Your factually grounded argment is persuasive. n/t EFerrari May 2012 #6
100% agree. n/t rayofreason May 2012 #9
+1 (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #13
Oh, please, don't mislead. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #17
This research is in the UK. What does the FDA and Washington DC NickB79 May 2012 #23
Big business, altruism? Read this reporting, though it sounds like a fictional political thriller. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #25
NOTE: Posts #23 and #25 refer to Dr. Arpad Pusztai's work in the UK described in post #18. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #45
Suppression of science free of conflict of interest: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpad_Pusztai proverbialwisdom May 2012 #18
Another grossly misleading oversimplification. Not up to speed? FORBES on the CDC here. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #20
Keep your pollen out of my fields! Jeffreytaos May 2012 #10
Welcome Jeffery... zeemike May 2012 #12
So can I sue my neighbors for their grass pollen? Igel May 2012 #15
Bingo, but only if you own the pollen patent. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #34
Correction: they could sue YOU for their pollen on your property if they own the pollen patent. proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #57
Yep. (nt) Posteritatis May 2012 #8
Research? Jeffreytaos May 2012 #11
Is all bold the new all caps? (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #14
I was wondering the same thing... KansDem May 2012 #50
DU is not ready for the massive power of bold + caps. (nt) harmonicon May 2012 #52
Science that some people don't support = not really science? 4th law of robotics May 2012 #26
The Grahamites are staging a field burning. Someone inform AgriGen Scootaloo May 2012 #2
Bring your kink-spring guns. NickB79 May 2012 #24
I was hoping it wouldn't fly over everyone's head! Scootaloo Jun 2012 #55
Read the headline.... James48 May 2012 #16
More here: http://taketheflourback.org/ proverbialwisdom May 2012 #19
Obama to unveil plan for helping African farmers may3rd May 2012 #22
Sad. "We know that their primary goal is not anybody’s food security but their own bottom line." proverbialwisdom May 2012 #31
Again, "Unlike big companies, small-scale women farmers do NOT grab millions of acres of land proverbialwisdom May 2012 #32
He can't have it both ways. Either help Africa or help agribusiness, but they're mutually exclusive WriteWrong May 2012 #43
Is this a Monsanto lab experiment destined to african farmers? may3rd May 2012 #21
Says enhanced to fight aphids, hence it makes its own bug spray, hence, yeah Monsanto, bemildred May 2012 #28
No, it makes the natural bug "ew, don't eat this" scent that 400 other plants already do. boppers May 2012 #29
I think a lot of people are not interested in the science 4th law of robotics May 2012 #30
A lot of people had poor science educations. boppers May 2012 #33
Nice summary of absence of consensus among FDA scientists described in 2001 legal brief at link. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #35
FUD boppers May 2012 #40
Fear, uncertainty, doubt? How about independent FDA scientists being overruled by bureaucrats? proverbialwisdom May 2012 #41
Kooks don't get to run the show. boppers May 2012 #42
They already are running the show ... Nihil May 2012 #44
Selection is a slow method to find vertical mutations, variants, and interesting gene transfers. boppers May 2012 #46
I apologise. Nihil May 2012 #47
We argue in many ways. boppers May 2012 #54
You really want to go there? How's the health ofAmerica's children since the introduction of gmos? proverbialwisdom May 2012 #48
The kids are fat, happy, and able to survive a famine. boppers May 2012 #53
Not really selection vs injection. yellowcanine May 2012 #51
Roundup-ready crops do NOT fight weeds. They resist being poisoned by a broad-spectrum herbicide WriteWrong May 2012 #38
You are correct about "Roundup(c)(TM)" crops being resistant to an herbicide. boppers May 2012 #39
Senate defeats attempt to study genetically engineered salmon. proverbialwisdom May 2012 #36
That's what they get for confusing a protest with an action WriteWrong May 2012 #37
5/23/12 Press Release: American Medical Association Considers GMO Labels proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #56
The cavalry is coming. proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #58
"...AMA delegates decided to refer this resolution to a committee that would review recent science." proverbialwisdom Jun 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Anti-GM protesters kept f...»Reply #59