Latest Breaking News

Vogon_Glory

(10,211 posts)

6. But, But Bernie! say the fans-boys! n/t

Reply to riversedge (Original post)

Thu May 26, 2016, 01:00 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kentucky recanvass confirms Clinton as winner [View all] riversedge May 2016 OP

figured as much ericson00 May 2016 #1

the Kentucky taxpayers footed the bill. He sure sues a lot-costing the camp $$ riversedge May 2016 #2

a) He didn't sue b) election accuracy more important than $$ askeptic May 2016 #7

I did not say Sanders sued in this case. riversedge May 2016 #13

you did most assuredly imply it nt AntiBank May 2016 #15

Well, living in your Bernie Bubble leads to an active (inaccurate) imagination. bye. riversedge May 2016 #18

You did most certainly leftinportland May 2016 #54

Then why was "Bernie sure sues a lot" in the title of your post? askeptic May 2016 #56

But he does. He sues alot. bravenak May 2016 #58

Aside from missing the point - A Hillary supporter projecting about lawsuits askeptic May 2016 #73

The general election is winner take all. sufrommich May 2016 #60

I doubt it cost very much jmowreader May 2016 #31

Exactly! hamsterjill May 2016 #46

WE WANT A RECOUNT! brooklynite May 2016 #3

Failing to see reality. LiberalFighter May 2016 #4

What was that even about? Trying to take attention away from the ugly truth of the MADem May 2016 #5

Naw - MSM Rarely pays attention to anything Bernie says or does. askeptic May 2016 #9

IF -- as you say -- "MSM Rarely pays attention to anything Bernie says" --then MADem May 2016 #14

WA Primary? BBG May 2016 #11

Proving my point. People who bother to vote, vote for Clinton. nt MADem May 2016 #16

ha ha.. It increased the Popular vote count for hillary.. YES, it DID> riversedge May 2016 #20

To me this just shows that Clinton supporters did not know how the WA Democrat voting works... L.A.C. May 2016 #17

That's what it shows to you? That tens of thousands of caucus goers can subvert MADem May 2016 #19

Caucuses favor the "true believer." alfredo May 2016 #23

They favor young people who don't have jobs, children, MADem May 2016 #36

In our county caucus it was mostly party insiders alfredo May 2016 #44

"Fun," but not representative of the actual members of the party. nt MADem May 2016 #50

True. alfredo May 2016 #59

This graphic really shows how "un-representative" those caucuses can be.... MADem May 2016 #64

True believers vs rank and file alfredo May 2016 #68

Ever hear of a Surrogate Affidavit Form? L.A.C. May 2016 #65

I think we'd hear about it if there were 675K of those forms floating around. MADem May 2016 #71

Also, Sanders can no longer run to the SD's for WA and claim it is the Will of the People riversedge May 2016 #22

+1! nt MADem May 2016 #38

Jaxon Ravens, the chair of the WA state Democratic party, said he would not vote in the primary L.A.C. May 2016 #49

So FEW turned out to caucus--so MANY turned out to VOTE. MADem May 2016 #69

People know full well how it works LisaM May 2016 #61

As someone who actually did attend, I take qualms with the word 'toxic' L.A.C. May 2016 #62

I'm sure the perspective is quite different if you're in the majority. It probably seems like fun. LisaM May 2016 #63

But, But Bernie! say the fans-boys! n/t Vogon_Glory May 2016 #6

Sanders I hope is paying the bill...oops I forget that Bernie and Jane only beachbumbob May 2016 #8

So there you go. Wonder how much that re-canvass cost the taxpayers of Kentucky? George II May 2016 #10

Grasping at straws is starting to cost $... stopbush May 2016 #12

It feeds into the victimhood narrative, worth every penny. alfredo May 2016 #27

Chaa! Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #21

seems like a lot of people who care about election security mopinko May 2016 #24

Actually, Kentucky has a good system. alfredo May 2016 #35

Fine she squeaked by. Mary Mac May 2016 #25

A win is a win. Agree--past time to move on to task of keeping Trump out of the Oval Office. riversedge May 2016 #42

I'm sure they'll try and come up with some other conspiracy theory nt UMTerp01 May 2016 #26

Golly. That's surprising since they recounted the paper ballots and all. Stevepol May 2016 #28

Our county checks and rechecks the machines between elections. alfredo May 2016 #39

I'm sure there were other checks done too Stevepol May 2016 #72

So, it's status quo. Beacool May 2016 #29

Yeah... chervilant May 2016 #30

Her campaign is fine. Beacool May 2016 #33

Why all the insults? FlaGranny May 2016 #32

Kentucky does run clean elections under Grimes. alfredo May 2016 #41

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #34

He wanted his recanvass as the rules say bluestateguy May 2016 #37

Now, was that so hard? Iggo May 2016 #40

lmao at this gloating by the insecure Hillary supporters retrowire May 2016 #43

But...SHENANIGANS! Maven May 2016 #45

I'm sure the taxpayers of KY leftynyc May 2016 #47

contradictory PatrynXX May 2016 #48

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #51

Law suit sanders loses again Politicub May 2016 #52

That's good.😄 Laser102 May 2016 #67

So as long as we completely trust every voting machine without auditing a single one, we now mhatrw May 2016 #53

What a waste of time and money lunamagica May 2016 #55

K & R SunSeeker May 2016 #57

Good! Laser102 May 2016 #66

I figured as much. blackspade May 2016 #70