Latest Breaking News

MADem

(135,425 posts)

14. IF -- as you say -- "MSM Rarely pays attention to anything Bernie says" --then

Thu May 26, 2016, 01:30 PM

May 2016

why would they "notice" this?

Had things gone his way, it would not have affected his delegate count by more than one. ONE is not going to solve his problems.

I think he did it to distract from the hideous news from Washington--that when people actually get to VOTE, and not swarm and bully, Hillary wins. Funny how she's not talking about how the system is "rigged" -- if WA went by primary results, she'd have won that contest and taken many more delegates.

https://twitter.com/SteveKornacki/status/735313329187618818?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

73 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kentucky recanvass confirms Clinton as winner [View all] riversedge May 2016 OP

figured as much ericson00 May 2016 #1

the Kentucky taxpayers footed the bill. He sure sues a lot-costing the camp $$ riversedge May 2016 #2

a) He didn't sue b) election accuracy more important than $$ askeptic May 2016 #7

I did not say Sanders sued in this case. riversedge May 2016 #13

you did most assuredly imply it nt AntiBank May 2016 #15

Well, living in your Bernie Bubble leads to an active (inaccurate) imagination. bye. riversedge May 2016 #18

You did most certainly leftinportland May 2016 #54

Then why was "Bernie sure sues a lot" in the title of your post? askeptic May 2016 #56

But he does. He sues alot. bravenak May 2016 #58

Aside from missing the point - A Hillary supporter projecting about lawsuits askeptic May 2016 #73

The general election is winner take all. sufrommich May 2016 #60

I doubt it cost very much jmowreader May 2016 #31

Exactly! hamsterjill May 2016 #46

WE WANT A RECOUNT! brooklynite May 2016 #3

Failing to see reality. LiberalFighter May 2016 #4

What was that even about? Trying to take attention away from the ugly truth of the MADem May 2016 #5

Naw - MSM Rarely pays attention to anything Bernie says or does. askeptic May 2016 #9

IF -- as you say -- "MSM Rarely pays attention to anything Bernie says" --then MADem May 2016 #14

WA Primary? BBG May 2016 #11

Proving my point. People who bother to vote, vote for Clinton. nt MADem May 2016 #16

ha ha.. It increased the Popular vote count for hillary.. YES, it DID> riversedge May 2016 #20

To me this just shows that Clinton supporters did not know how the WA Democrat voting works... L.A.C. May 2016 #17

That's what it shows to you? That tens of thousands of caucus goers can subvert MADem May 2016 #19

Caucuses favor the "true believer." alfredo May 2016 #23

They favor young people who don't have jobs, children, MADem May 2016 #36

In our county caucus it was mostly party insiders alfredo May 2016 #44

"Fun," but not representative of the actual members of the party. nt MADem May 2016 #50

True. alfredo May 2016 #59

This graphic really shows how "un-representative" those caucuses can be.... MADem May 2016 #64

True believers vs rank and file alfredo May 2016 #68

Ever hear of a Surrogate Affidavit Form? L.A.C. May 2016 #65

I think we'd hear about it if there were 675K of those forms floating around. MADem May 2016 #71

Also, Sanders can no longer run to the SD's for WA and claim it is the Will of the People riversedge May 2016 #22

+1! nt MADem May 2016 #38

Jaxon Ravens, the chair of the WA state Democratic party, said he would not vote in the primary L.A.C. May 2016 #49

So FEW turned out to caucus--so MANY turned out to VOTE. MADem May 2016 #69

People know full well how it works LisaM May 2016 #61

As someone who actually did attend, I take qualms with the word 'toxic' L.A.C. May 2016 #62

I'm sure the perspective is quite different if you're in the majority. It probably seems like fun. LisaM May 2016 #63

But, But Bernie! say the fans-boys! n/t Vogon_Glory May 2016 #6

Sanders I hope is paying the bill...oops I forget that Bernie and Jane only beachbumbob May 2016 #8

So there you go. Wonder how much that re-canvass cost the taxpayers of Kentucky? George II May 2016 #10

Grasping at straws is starting to cost $... stopbush May 2016 #12

It feeds into the victimhood narrative, worth every penny. alfredo May 2016 #27

Chaa! Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #21

seems like a lot of people who care about election security mopinko May 2016 #24

Actually, Kentucky has a good system. alfredo May 2016 #35

Fine she squeaked by. Mary Mac May 2016 #25

A win is a win. Agree--past time to move on to task of keeping Trump out of the Oval Office. riversedge May 2016 #42

I'm sure they'll try and come up with some other conspiracy theory nt UMTerp01 May 2016 #26

Golly. That's surprising since they recounted the paper ballots and all. Stevepol May 2016 #28

Our county checks and rechecks the machines between elections. alfredo May 2016 #39

I'm sure there were other checks done too Stevepol May 2016 #72

So, it's status quo. Beacool May 2016 #29

Yeah... chervilant May 2016 #30

Her campaign is fine. Beacool May 2016 #33

Why all the insults? FlaGranny May 2016 #32

Kentucky does run clean elections under Grimes. alfredo May 2016 #41

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #34

He wanted his recanvass as the rules say bluestateguy May 2016 #37

Now, was that so hard? Iggo May 2016 #40

lmao at this gloating by the insecure Hillary supporters retrowire May 2016 #43

But...SHENANIGANS! Maven May 2016 #45

I'm sure the taxpayers of KY leftynyc May 2016 #47

contradictory PatrynXX May 2016 #48

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #51

Law suit sanders loses again Politicub May 2016 #52

That's good.😄 Laser102 May 2016 #67

So as long as we completely trust every voting machine without auditing a single one, we now mhatrw May 2016 #53

What a waste of time and money lunamagica May 2016 #55

K & R SunSeeker May 2016 #57

Good! Laser102 May 2016 #66

I figured as much. blackspade May 2016 #70