Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Kentucky recanvass confirms Clinton as winner [View all]L.A.C.
(15 posts)People didn't have to go to the caucus to have their vote count. They did not have to take the day off or wait in line or listen to speeches. They had the option to fill out a form available online and mail or fax or email it back to have their vote actually count for something. If you claim that these primary results indicate that Clinton actually has more support in WA than Bernie (which I do not believe), then how can you argue with the statement that they clearly did not know how to make their vote count? I agree that it is incredibly disheartening that hundreds of thousands of more people voted on something that does not count for anything than actually participated when it does count. That should be addressed, though I personally don't think that it would have changed the proportion of delegates by much. What I don't understand is why you think that is funny? Either they were misinformed, ill informed, or simply didn't care enough to participate in the caucus and to me that's no laughing matter.