Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders Supporters to File Emergency Injunction Against California Primary [View all]Nitram
(27,340 posts)36. I think the term is frivolous.
I notice Bernie didn't mind when the rules helped him win.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders Supporters to File Emergency Injunction Against California Primary [View all]
Cali_Democrat
May 2016
OP
I live in California and we don't appreciate wasting the states time and money with such an ignorant
skylucy
May 2016
#74
Well, the Sanders camp looks foolish once again. Gawds. How embarrassing to Democrats.
riversedge
May 2016
#3
Sanders supporters have already lost this lawsuit-no hearing until after primary
Gothmog
May 2016
#4
which is even more nefarious. It indicates they want a re do after they cast their ballot
still_one
May 2016
#29
Obviously Sanders has his own set of rules. They are asking for a redo of a ballot they already
still_one
May 2016
#31
Are they saying they cast a wrong ballot? Gee, when I vote on a ballot I READ IT. Why would you
still_one
May 2016
#7
They registered as NPP, (No Party Preference), received a non-partisan ballot, because they
still_one
May 2016
#19
Or did they register as an Independent and get an AIP ballot thinking they were an NPP?
LiberalArkie
May 2016
#42
They're looking for free publicity and to increase the anger of aggrieved Bernie supporters. n/t
pnwmom
May 2016
#9
here is an example of the scapegoating Bernie for Hillary's Nov defeat being prepared already
cloudythescribbler
May 2016
#30
Yes everyone else is at fault. Let's not take responsibility for ourselves. Let's just sue. Wow!
Laser102
May 2016
#44
It's standard procedure to provide the NPP ballot UPON REQUEST. If they didn't like
pnwmom
May 2016
#15
They can exchange the ballot on election day. Instead this OP says they filled out and submitted
still_one
May 2016
#22
for all the whining on this thread & from Herrera's office, these concerns sound sensible nt
cloudythescribbler
May 2016
#24
I think the criticism you offer is constructive and perhaps should be passed along to whoever
Samantha
May 2016
#96
What a lot of people don't realize is that so many of the people doing this work are volunteers.
pnwmom
May 2016
#67
It shouldn't be hard at all for anyone who can read. Here is a copy of the postcard
pnwmom
May 2016
#80
Sanders camp and his constant law suits, Demeaning and intimidation protests, calling a
riversedge
May 2016
#26
Yes. I noticed immediately that it says "Supporters" not the "Sanders Campaign". I posted earlier
skylucy
May 2016
#85
If Sanders were to receive the nomination could we expect more of these shenaningans?
LiberalFighter
May 2016
#35
And the interest of the nation demands obstructing California primaries with
beastie boy
May 2016
#104
amazing how some people are smart enough to figure out how to vote and bernie supporters cant nt
msongs
May 2016
#41
An entire thread of Hillary supporters supporting the type of voter disenfranchisement that R's do
w4rma
May 2016
#50
California voters had until last Sunday to register thei party affiliation.
liberal N proud
May 2016
#53
Looks like the new meme of the day, after that MSNBC Mika show, say anything other than
litlbilly
May 2016
#63
The "Voting Rights Defense Project" is the same group that filed the other lawsuit.
pnwmom
May 2016
#64
You're saying that the judge is not an honest arbiter of the law? Interesting take.
JonLeibowitz
May 2016
#78
