Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
10. Oh, don't I know it. My pension, from a job I worked at from 1969 through 1979, has been cut
Sun May 29, 2016, 02:31 AM
May 2016

by two thirds. I'm lucky in that I always assumed that pension would be quite trivial. But not so long ago I took a look at mailings from the pension plan administrators, before my benefit was cut, and I was astonished at how much it should have been. Which would still be noticeably less than that one third of the three legged stool. At least I did not ever expect that the pension from that company. would be significant income in my retirement. But others with that company, those who worked there for thirty or forty years, who'd come to expect their pension would be one of those third legs of retirement, boy were they disabused. This was a major airline which got to declare bankruptcy (more than once I think) and so bail out from the pension plan. It seems that over the years they somehow didn't bother to put in the moneys they should have. Thank whatever you might believe in for the Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation, or I and my former co-workers wouldn't even be getting that one third.

I recall reading back in the 1970's that various local governments weren't properly funding their pension plans. And wouldn't you know, there's a lot of noise these days about various local, municipal, or state government pensions. Seems those employees are expecting entirely too much, and we need to cut those pensions drastically. The fact that they weren't funded properly in the first place somehow never comes up.

Perhaps more to the point, to get back to my specific situation: I worked at one company for just over ten years. Then I got married and stayed home for twenty five years raising two children. Since then (and during a tiny bit in those child-raising years) I've worked at several different jobs. None of which offered anything in the way of a pension. After a divorce and a relocation to another part of the country, I wound up working for the local hospital and participating in the 403b (the non-profit version of a 401k) for several years.

My essential point is this: People change jobs. People leave the work force. The ideal of working 30 or more years for the same company and retiring with a lovely pension has NEVER applied to more than a relatively small percentage of people. I recall, back in the 60s and 70s reading genuine horror stories of men who were with a union, who worked faithfully for many years, and then six months or so before retirement, being switched to a different local, which essentially cancelled their union pension.

Don't get me wrong. I think strong unions are the bedrock of the working class, and should be encouraged. I'm also aware of some of the terrible flaws in them.

A secure retirement has almost always been ephemeral. I know that Social Security really did keep many older folks from starvation. My own grandparents are a good example. They were all born in the latter part of the 19th century, and all immigrated to this country from Ireland. I'll spare you all the details, but just say that in old age they all wound up living with their own grown children towards. I also know that Social Security provided a very small amount of money, but it was very helpful to them.

I'm fortunate enough to have other financial resources so that I, at age 67, can live without paid employment, and live reasonably well. Everyone should be at my standard, if not above this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

WHAT!! A Republican Billionaire wanting to cut Social Security?? No way!! Midnight Writer May 2016 #1
unfortunately that was a misquote, the entire article has been changed to say he opposes cuts AntiBank May 2016 #31
So if Trump really is against SS cuts then we have truly made a big gain as democrats hollowdweller Jun 2016 #36
Honestly, the ONLY thing Trump has said that I liked was NO CUTS TO SOCIAL SECURITY OR MEDICARE. Midnight Writer May 2016 #2
If eligible US voters allow this conman to get within shouting distance spiderpig May 2016 #3
Hillary needs to get this on the megaphone DonCoquixote May 2016 #4
GATS and TiSA likely will privatize it too. Baobab May 2016 #6
Hear! Hear! ReRe May 2016 #14
Oh, jeez. SheilaT May 2016 #5
Your very lucky then alot of people though over the years have watched as companies literally cut cstanleytech May 2016 #7
Oh, don't I know it. My pension, from a job I worked at from 1969 through 1979, has been cut SheilaT May 2016 #10
Great read SheilaT!!! wolfie001 May 2016 #18
At age 69, I agree that this is correct. colorado_ufo Jun 2016 #32
Just my thinking but Democrats need better articles than this snappyturtle May 2016 #8
Where there's smoke, there's fire ailsagirl May 2016 #11
"Trump" ... "Moral Standpoint" ... Jopin Klobe May 2016 #9
"A Trump presidency would threaten programs like Social Security. Here's how we know..." ailsagirl May 2016 #12
This artical could have been written 3 months ago Jnclr89 May 2016 #13
Never trust a flimflam man... ReRe May 2016 #15
You are assuming Trump was NOT lying to Ryan. happyslug May 2016 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #17
Trump's Labeled Everyone Else - Time to Label Him bucolic_frolic May 2016 #19
Third Rail douchebag - You're Fired jpak May 2016 #20
Its not just Trump that needs to be fired if people want to stop this its the Republicans in cstanleytech May 2016 #21
Wait, we know that Trump's a lying liar, so... dobleremolque May 2016 #22
So he says, from a moral standpoint daleo May 2016 #23
Well, it's out there. YOHABLO May 2016 #24
Listening to Trump is such a total mindfuck milestogo May 2016 #25
That's my strategy. I can't listen much less read LuckyLib Jun 2016 #38
Together we will beat Trump. Thinkingabout May 2016 #26
He wouldn't know a "moral standpoint" if it kicked him in his roomy backside. n/t Judi Lynn May 2016 #27
Trump reminds me of Judge Smails: Kingofalldems May 2016 #28
you can sum up Donald Drumpf in one word, that word being Atrocious olddad56 May 2016 #29
the article has been changed completely on HuffPo to the opposite, he OPPOSES cuts AntiBank May 2016 #30
K & R Quantess Jun 2016 #33
"Unnamed source" + an internet tabloid = today's nothing burger. closeupready Jun 2016 #34
This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Jun 2016 #35
It's always about morality with chapdrum Jun 2016 #37
It is the moral standpoint of an amoral villain. sofa king Jun 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump Supports Cutting So...»Reply #10