Latest Breaking News

maq-az

(40 posts)

9. What have you done

Sun May 29, 2016, 05:06 AM

May 2016

For the Democratic party? Worked any phone banks, helped with our mailers? How many meetings have you been a part of? Or how about this. Have you run for office, in your LD or State how about City or County? Those are the hard working superdelegates and they deserve the position and a voice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Latest: Wyoming splits delegates 7-7 to Clinton, Sanders [View all] riversedge May 2016 OP

Please, add a headline to your post. herding cats May 2016 #1

my mistake. time riversedge May 2016 #3

. herding cats May 2016 #4

isn't that the truth and thanks riversedge May 2016 #28

Thanks for sharing. Thinkingabout May 2016 #2

Thanks. 840high May 2016 #5

New York Times showed Bernie won the caucus by a lead of over 12 percent. JDPriestly May 2016 #6

It's not shockingly unfair... Chicago1980 May 2016 #7

I'll give it to you, Chicago 1980... ReRe May 2016 #8

How would he have run a country if he couldn't navigate HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #13

How would Hillary run the country if she can't navigate simple data security? Gore1FL May 2016 #15

What did did she lose ... please be specific. JoePhilly May 2016 #21

Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #35

She did not turn in one of her e-mails to the State Department when she left. JDPriestly May 2016 #55

Data security? HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #23

Well, we know that the BS crowd-many of them love to loss out RW smears. riversedge May 2016 #29

Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #34

Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #33

She did navigate data security by not being breeched like the State Department. Chicago1980 May 2016 #30

Fair point n/t HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #31

Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #32

Does no good mdbl May 2016 #39

Bernie seems to know how to.... reACTIONary May 2016 #40

Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #41

I think it's a good qustion to ask..... reACTIONary May 2016 #44

Regardless if it is a good question or not, what does it have to do with what I posted? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #46

It seemed to me that you were maintaining that asking .... reACTIONary May 2016 #47

It seems to me I was asking a rhetorical question... Gore1FL May 2016 #51

And on, and on... eom reACTIONary May 2016 #52

Do you have a link that says that Bernie did not know the rules? JDPriestly May 2016 #53

See, that's the problem, right there... HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #61

"Not knowing the rules" is.... reACTIONary Jun 2016 #68

Just FYI . ... reACTIONary Jun 2016 #69

12% of the voters who were Bernie voters were disenfranchised. JDPriestly May 2016 #57

Bernie and Hillary are nothing alike... ReRe May 2016 #36

I think our life would be the worse for having... reACTIONary May 2016 #45

I don't know if I can understand your... ReRe May 2016 #48

Allow me to quote from your post.... reACTIONary May 2016 #49

Ahhhh.... ReRe May 2016 #50

In Wyoming, Bernie won 12% more of the votes than did Hillary JDPriestly May 2016 #58

The goal of the state primaries should be to ascertain the will of the voters, the choice JDPriestly May 2016 #56

Actually itnis unfair and gamed. ananda May 2016 #10

You're referencing caucuses, right? HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #24

The Democratic Party should hold primaries, not caucuses. JDPriestly May 2016 #59

And if they didn't like the rules of the game they should have played the game. George II May 2016 #37

It cheats 12% of the voters. JDPriestly May 2016 #54

What have you done maq-az May 2016 #9

What does that have to do with the topic? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #16

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #12

It was not over 12%. It was 11.4% LiberalFighter May 2016 #19

NOT DNC rules...Wyoming State Party rules brooklynite May 2016 #20

Wyoming State Party bylaws don't determine number of national delegates. LiberalFighter May 2016 #25

Do you know how the delegates are assigned based on the voting? George II May 2016 #38

The result shows that the system is undemocratic. JDPriestly May 2016 #60

What's undemocratic is that standards were established to determine delegate elections a year or.. George II May 2016 #62

Sanders only started running a little over a year ago. JDPriestly May 2016 #63

So state legislatures and Democratic parties should fall all over themselves.... George II May 2016 #64

The Democratic Party should organize a system that best measures JDPriestly May 2016 #67

Sort of like how Hilary won the WA Primary LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #65

I agree with you. This is something that needs to be worked on. JDPriestly May 2016 #66

Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #14

Did they do that when Bush had more electors in 2000? Renew Deal May 2016 #17

Hillary won the places where people live Renew Deal May 2016 #18

Wyoming. I was so disappointed when ghoul Wallis (R) died in her sleep and no Ds even tried to take Sunlei May 2016 #22

The Washington, D.C. Democratic primary is on Jun 14 nt Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #26

Now he's officially challenging math. Denying reality, eh? CrowCityDem May 2016 #27

Fine, let him challenge. But that's what happens with proportional allocation, and it helped geek tragedy May 2016 #42

It is moot at this stage. riversedge May 2016 #43