Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

reACTIONary

(7,161 posts)
45. I think our life would be the worse for having...
Mon May 30, 2016, 03:49 PM
May 2016

.... those in charge who are apt to call others "crooked" simply because they only get 46% of the vote.

In addition to the alleged snide, us guys seem to also have 56% of the vote.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Please, add a headline to your post. herding cats May 2016 #1
my mistake. time riversedge May 2016 #3
. herding cats May 2016 #4
isn't that the truth and thanks riversedge May 2016 #28
Thanks for sharing. Thinkingabout May 2016 #2
Thanks. 840high May 2016 #5
New York Times showed Bernie won the caucus by a lead of over 12 percent. JDPriestly May 2016 #6
It's not shockingly unfair... Chicago1980 May 2016 #7
I'll give it to you, Chicago 1980... ReRe May 2016 #8
How would he have run a country if he couldn't navigate HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #13
How would Hillary run the country if she can't navigate simple data security? Gore1FL May 2016 #15
What did did she lose ... please be specific. JoePhilly May 2016 #21
Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #35
She did not turn in one of her e-mails to the State Department when she left. JDPriestly May 2016 #55
Data security? HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #23
Well, we know that the BS crowd-many of them love to loss out RW smears. riversedge May 2016 #29
Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #34
Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #33
She did navigate data security by not being breeched like the State Department. Chicago1980 May 2016 #30
Fair point n/t HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #31
Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #32
Does no good mdbl May 2016 #39
Bernie seems to know how to.... reACTIONary May 2016 #40
Does anyone read past the title? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #41
I think it's a good qustion to ask..... reACTIONary May 2016 #44
Regardless if it is a good question or not, what does it have to do with what I posted? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #46
It seemed to me that you were maintaining that asking .... reACTIONary May 2016 #47
It seems to me I was asking a rhetorical question... Gore1FL May 2016 #51
And on, and on... eom reACTIONary May 2016 #52
Do you have a link that says that Bernie did not know the rules? JDPriestly May 2016 #53
See, that's the problem, right there... HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #61
"Not knowing the rules" is.... reACTIONary Jun 2016 #68
Just FYI . ... reACTIONary Jun 2016 #69
12% of the voters who were Bernie voters were disenfranchised. JDPriestly May 2016 #57
Bernie and Hillary are nothing alike... ReRe May 2016 #36
I think our life would be the worse for having... reACTIONary May 2016 #45
I don't know if I can understand your... ReRe May 2016 #48
Allow me to quote from your post.... reACTIONary May 2016 #49
Ahhhh.... ReRe May 2016 #50
In Wyoming, Bernie won 12% more of the votes than did Hillary JDPriestly May 2016 #58
The goal of the state primaries should be to ascertain the will of the voters, the choice JDPriestly May 2016 #56
Actually itnis unfair and gamed. ananda May 2016 #10
You're referencing caucuses, right? HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #24
The Democratic Party should hold primaries, not caucuses. JDPriestly May 2016 #59
And if they didn't like the rules of the game they should have played the game. George II May 2016 #37
It cheats 12% of the voters. JDPriestly May 2016 #54
What have you done maq-az May 2016 #9
What does that have to do with the topic? nt Gore1FL May 2016 #16
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author HillareeeHillaraah May 2016 #12
It was not over 12%. It was 11.4% LiberalFighter May 2016 #19
NOT DNC rules...Wyoming State Party rules brooklynite May 2016 #20
Wyoming State Party bylaws don't determine number of national delegates. LiberalFighter May 2016 #25
Do you know how the delegates are assigned based on the voting? George II May 2016 #38
The result shows that the system is undemocratic. JDPriestly May 2016 #60
What's undemocratic is that standards were established to determine delegate elections a year or.. George II May 2016 #62
Sanders only started running a little over a year ago. JDPriestly May 2016 #63
So state legislatures and Democratic parties should fall all over themselves.... George II May 2016 #64
The Democratic Party should organize a system that best measures JDPriestly May 2016 #67
Sort of like how Hilary won the WA Primary LoverOfLiberty May 2016 #65
I agree with you. This is something that needs to be worked on. JDPriestly May 2016 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2016 #14
Did they do that when Bush had more electors in 2000? Renew Deal May 2016 #17
Hillary won the places where people live Renew Deal May 2016 #18
Wyoming. I was so disappointed when ghoul Wallis (R) died in her sleep and no Ds even tried to take Sunlei May 2016 #22
The Washington, D.C. Democratic primary is on Jun 14 nt Agnosticsherbet May 2016 #26
Now he's officially challenging math. Denying reality, eh? CrowCityDem May 2016 #27
Fine, let him challenge. But that's what happens with proportional allocation, and it helped geek tragedy May 2016 #42
It is moot at this stage. riversedge May 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News» The Latest: Wyoming spli...»Reply #45