Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(20,234 posts)

5. 83 percent of Missouri’s carbon-free energy Think of the POTENTIAL for water,wind, solar and

Fri Jun 3, 2016, 08:16 PM

Jun 2016

Geothermal. MO has a long way to go and has to get their without more nuclear.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Nuclear Option Could Be Best Bet to Combat Climate Change [View all] StarTrombone Jun 2016 OP

Great, exchange one time bomb for another... newthinking Jun 2016 #1

Exactly. The issue is what do we do with the waste? And jwirr Jun 2016 #14

Maybe we could work on the way we live while we are at it. jalan48 Jun 2016 #4

I dont know about nuclear fusion reddread Jun 2016 #6

"my God can they produce megawatts of bullshit." bananas Jun 2016 #7

And this thread clearly violates the LBN rules. bananas Jun 2016 #15

Let's try solar, geothermal, wind and anything else first. Octafish Jun 2016 #8

Fukushima shadowmayor Jun 2016 #9

Note the insults directed at Bill Nye and Al Gore by the OP. blm Jun 2016 #11

If the ancient Egyptians had had nuclear power truebluegreen Jun 2016 #12

Only if it leads to an extreme reduction Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #13

LOCKING THREAD AS ANALYSIS/OPINION LostOne4Ever Jun 2016 #16