Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

antigop

(12,778 posts)
Mon Jun 6, 2016, 11:17 AM Jun 2016

State Department Blocks Release Of Hillary Clinton-Era TPP Emails Until After The Election [View all]

Source: ibtimes

Trade is a hot issue in the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. But correspondence from Hillary Clinton and her top State Department aides about a controversial 12-nation trade deal will not be available for public review — at least not until after the election. The Obama administration abruptly blocked the release of Clinton’s State Department correspondence about the so-called Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), after first saying it expected to produce the emails this spring.

The decision came in response to International Business Times' open records request for correspondence between Clinton’s State Department office and the United States Trade Representative. The request, which was submitted in July 2015, specifically asked for all such correspondence that made reference to the TPP.

The State Department originally said it estimated the request would be completed by April 2016. Last week the agency said it had completed the search process for the correspondence but also said it was delaying the completion of the request until late November 2016 — weeks after the presidential election. The delay was issued in the same week the Obama administration filed a court motion to try to kill a lawsuit aimed at forcing the federal government to more quickly comply with open records requests for Clinton-era State Department documents.

Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/political-capital/state-department-blocks-release-hillary-clinton-era-tpp-emails-until-after

217 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Outrageous. nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #1
Sanders has lost: This more propaganda from a dying campaign. lewebley3 Jun 2016 #62
So the State department isn't holding them back? What? nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #65
It's a moot point: Hillary has done nothing wrong lewebley3 Jun 2016 #73
Lol. Please. nt phazed0 Jun 2016 #81
I'm not religious. katsy Jun 2016 #83
Russell's teapot SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #125
Ty. Exactly 👍🏼 nt katsy Jun 2016 #134
What you said. avaistheone1 Jun 2016 #143
You seem to know nothing about Hillary's history OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #96
the problem with HRC is that we do know her history. This ia a deal breaker for me. I know she wants roguevalley Jun 2016 #103
Unless you were actually considering voting for her I doubt its a deal breaker. cstanleytech Jun 2016 #179
That would be b4ecause they haven't held the positions in gov't she has rpannier Jun 2016 #182
We already know she did her job and worked to get it passed though. nt cstanleytech Jun 2016 #183
And I think people are entitled to know the process rpannier Jun 2016 #185
If she was a total unknown maybe but shes been in the public light for decades cstanleytech Jun 2016 #190
What you said nikto Jun 2016 #203
Then why not release them zentrum Jun 2016 #120
Why would we vote for anyone linked to an FBI investigation SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #127
Perhaps not. But if information that would harm Hillary's political future is being withheld JDPriestly Jun 2016 #133
You may be right that she has done nothing illegal . . . markpkessinger Jun 2016 #145
Says you GRhodes Jun 2016 #154
This is about the TPP, not "wrong doing" blackspade Jun 2016 #167
If she did nothing wrong why hide her TPP emails All in it together Jun 2016 #175
I suspect its not that she did anything criminal cstanleytech Jun 2016 #180
Is that what you repeat to yourself over and over hoping beyond hope that it's true? rhett o rick Jun 2016 #196
I have to repeat because Sanders repeatedly lie: lewebley3 Jun 2016 #214
ibtimes is a Sanders propaganda outfit? (n/t) thesquanderer Jun 2016 #70
The International Business Times sulphurdunn Jun 2016 #92
You should probably look that word up... AzDar Jun 2016 #116
No, the American voters have lost. n/t woodsprite Jun 2016 #128
This only impacts Bernie Sanders? GRhodes Jun 2016 #153
thanks for showcasing your tacit approval with an indefensible and silly dodge stupidicus Jun 2016 #165
This has nothing to do with Sanders and everything to do with transparency in politics. PoliticalMalcontent Jun 2016 #205
No body is saying nothing to see here: Sanders people whinning lewebley3 Jun 2016 #213
Democracy, American style. jalan48 Jun 2016 #2
Democracy, Planet-Earth Style maxsolomon Jun 2016 #157
I'm shocked! Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #3
All those surprised by this, holler now Scalded Nun Jun 2016 #4
"The Gold Standard" will not be discussed... think Jun 2016 #5
Its has been discussed and and debunked: as well as Sander failing campaign lewebley3 Jun 2016 #63
So she won't sign the TPP then right? think Jun 2016 #86
Heh :) MisterFred Jun 2016 #122
They will scream wildly, if you suggest huldufólk or elves don't exist! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #173
Is this a closed loop tape? libdem4life Jun 2016 #137
Obama covers his butt too Omaha Steve Jun 2016 #6
Obama is very honest and: Has most of the time made the right choices lewebley3 Jun 2016 #66
Corrupt as hell. If everything that needs to be released was she would have not gotten bkkyosemite Jun 2016 #7
*shrugs* christx30 Jun 2016 #8
not like trump... in a kinder gentler way tk2kewl Jun 2016 #11
No, she's not racist "like Trump" tularetom Jun 2016 #31
What has the Democratic party cone to ripcord Jun 2016 #97
Setting the bar pretty low, don't you think? n/t markpkessinger Jun 2016 #142
Well, she's our nominee. Not much can be done about that christx30 Jun 2016 #174
I don't think Sarah Palin is racist, either. Lets vote for her. Hoppy Jun 2016 #144
At least! "Thank heaven (or thank Gawd!) for small mercies! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #159
Could it be that she is totally fucking lying about her stance on the TPP? djean111 Jun 2016 #9
I do have a bet with my sister that KXL will get approved within her first year in office. TheBlackAdder Jun 2016 #24
I think you'll win that bet. Shemp Howard Jun 2016 #56
It depends on the price of oil. thesquanderer Jun 2016 #68
She wasn't lying. She was evolving. Gary 50 Jun 2016 #51
No, she didn't say she was against the TPP elljay Jun 2016 #117
See, we of the unwashed masses don't have the lawyers's jargon dictionary libdem4life Jun 2016 #138
Skeptical of what? elljay Jun 2016 #161
Skeptical of real evolution. The weasly words, lawyer speak... libdem4life Jun 2016 #189
Got it elljay Jun 2016 #210
Yes. Peace !! libdem4life Jun 2016 #212
Oh snap! That ain't what she was saying! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #169
Exactly. She's always shrewd, even when she's not being very smart. cui bono Jun 2016 #198
She always leaves herself a way out. colorado_ufo Jun 2016 #200
I remember seeing an interview... Goldfish Jun 2016 #141
The emails regarding TTP and the Wall Street speech transcripts Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #94
I would say it lying and that the papers on TPP prove it. jwirr Jun 2016 #113
Pretty much. Clinton is imploding the party, but accuses Bernie of the results. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #123
Yep...we are being forced to be complicit with all of this crap. libdem4life Jun 2016 #139
why, how transparent of them mooseprime Jun 2016 #10
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! OnyxCollie Jun 2016 #12
Wow Mark 750 Jun 2016 #13
Ahhh, crap! Duval Jun 2016 #14
Sneaky Hillary & her DC establishment machinery in action. AGAIN. Triana Jun 2016 #15
So very true ! ciaobaby Jun 2016 #19
The worst of it is that this is what the LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #27
It's amazing that an honest politician who wants to work for PEOPLE & can't be bought by corps Triana Jun 2016 #35
Shunned by the establishment. I know LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #41
I wish you were wrong, but damn .. I cannot dispute a word of your excellent rant. n/t 99th_Monkey Jun 2016 #32
+ 1000 LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #37
. libodem Jun 2016 #48
+1000 Triana Jun 2016 #79
. libodem Jun 2016 #99
Bringing the truth! dchill Jun 2016 #64
So sad. So true. agracie Jun 2016 #80
You're so right! I weep for our country and the world donf Jun 2016 #89
well said! green917 Jun 2016 #95
yup Agony Jun 2016 #163
I'm sticking with Bernie all the way to the Revolution! SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #176
This message was self-deleted by its author SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #177
there you go again azureblue Jun 2016 #184
+a brazillion!!! cui bono Jun 2016 #199
WHAT A GORGEOUS BRICK WALL! reddread Jun 2016 #16
Yet not a word from the Hillbots shawn703 Jun 2016 #17
Their talking points are predictable AgingAmerican Jun 2016 #33
you noticed that too huh? MidwestTech Jun 2016 #46
It's what you do.... SouthernDemLinda Jun 2016 #178
They Know The Fix Is In - And The Rest Of Us Are Chumps For Still Believing In Democracy cantbeserious Jun 2016 #58
The talking points are in: drokhole Jun 2016 #82
Infuriating! TryLogic Jun 2016 #18
Gotta protect the chosen candidate n/t geomon666 Jun 2016 #20
At least she's consistent in her efforts to not be transparent! lastone Jun 2016 #21
Um yeah. SammyWinstonJack Jun 2016 #22
So the State department is running interference in the election process ? azurnoir Jun 2016 #23
Sure looks that way. n/t warrprayer Jun 2016 #25
yeah, protecting her in every matter. grasswire Jun 2016 #104
Orders from the top, more than likely Hydra Jun 2016 #186
Well, we wouldn't want to confuse the voters. n/t malthaussen Jun 2016 #26
Ask the average person at the mall for an opinion on the LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #38
To be fair, I think it has been quite a while since most politicians cared what people think, djean111 Jun 2016 #47
When the TPP is signed into law and people LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #55
if the nominees of both parties are the same... Angel Martin Jun 2016 #105
That is not remotely true. djean111 Jun 2016 #114
First ask them do they vote. YOHABLO Jun 2016 #201
It's a given that they don't. And of those LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #202
Wasn't Obama supposed to be the . . FairWinds Jun 2016 #28
lol, we're in "wtf, why not?" mode I take it Babel_17 Jun 2016 #29
It pays to have friends in high places. -nt CrispyQ Jun 2016 #30
Lovely democracy we have in the U.S. Skwmom Jun 2016 #34
That speaks volumes. Will she sign it on the first or second day in office? Vinca Jun 2016 #36
It'll be on the podium during the Inaugural Address and will be LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #43
It will be signed before the next president takes office but after the election. RichVRichV Jun 2016 #50
No words. 840high Jun 2016 #39
obviously there is something there Javaman Jun 2016 #40
Yep. Like the speech transcripts. Hillary is about as LibDemAlways Jun 2016 #45
Things like this are why Kall Jun 2016 #42
They do not support democracy felix_numinous Jun 2016 #44
More campaign ammunition for her opponent. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #49
The reason Obama has asked for the delay? She was working under his direction. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #52
And what about Kerry? grasswire Jun 2016 #107
You see, there is no cover up. That is the part that drives people like you insane. You and the GOP. tonyt53 Jun 2016 #129
Stunning and obtuse. libdem4life Jun 2016 #140
Where does it say creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #195
Hillary Supporters Want Their "First Woman President" Lean Jun 2016 #53
And That Will Improve America How cantbeserious Jun 2016 #59
We'll finally be able to start fixing what the Republicans jeff47 Jun 2016 #111
HRC Is A Conservative Democrat - She Will Enable Ever More Corptocracy cantbeserious Jun 2016 #155
Yes...and when the party "falls" as in the post you replied to jeff47 Jun 2016 #217
No, they did NOT say they won't release them "until after the election", they said... George II Jun 2016 #54
Not an assumption. Scalded Nun Jun 2016 #71
But that is not what they said. What they said was reworded by the writer for sensationalism... George II Jun 2016 #72
It's insulting GRhodes Jun 2016 #194
In answer to your question ... Nihil Jun 2016 #211
They also said "The check is in the mail" and jeff47 Jun 2016 #112
No transcripts. No TPP e-mails. This is the candidate that Democrats want? highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #57
It's what the right wing Democrats and the corporate media wants. OwlinAZ Jun 2016 #98
K&R dchill Jun 2016 #60
You think the Obama transparency is a bit murky. Just wait. JEB Jun 2016 #61
we're not allowed to know what we're voting for, and Dems are fine with this MisterP Jun 2016 #67
and why the party has super delegates. nt grasswire Jun 2016 #109
Sounds a lot like The Wire season 4. Kablooie Jun 2016 #69
This is Obama telling the American Public d_legendary1 Jun 2016 #74
Wall Street allowed us to have marriage equality awoke_in_2003 Jun 2016 #75
Ha...I didnt post thus ..last night (early am) laserhaas Jun 2016 #76
Final Straw. I've had it. Paper Roses Jun 2016 #77
It's amazing SmittynMo Jun 2016 #85
.that^ 840high Jun 2016 #101
+1000 nt Javaman Jun 2016 #108
thank you PR grasswire Jun 2016 #110
We're gonna need a bigger train...... SmittynMo Jun 2016 #132
Yes - The Party Left Me - I Did Not Leave The Party cantbeserious Jun 2016 #162
^^this^^^ I have had it as well... Agony Jun 2016 #168
If you vote for this shit you at responsible for what happens, don't come crying later. onecaliberal Jun 2016 #78
But don't worry,,,,, SmittynMo Jun 2016 #84
But she is a woman and looks Presidential... coyote Jun 2016 #87
Whew! Us Loyal Democrats dodged a bullet there! lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #88
I see this backfiring on them....... Land of Enchantment Jun 2016 #90
From your link: Feds try to quash Republicans' lawsuit over Clinton messages ismnotwasm Jun 2016 #91
Obstruction of justice. moondust Jun 2016 #93
Great news! Gman Jun 2016 #100
OMG, Hillary wrote and received emails!! Kingofalldems Jun 2016 #102
Ohhhh NO,,, EMAILS,,,,, Oh the horror of it all! Cryptoad Jun 2016 #106
Where is the picture of Hillary saying Gary 50 Jun 2016 #135
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #172
The only thing to fear is the truth ... nikto Jun 2016 #204
So we should just believe politicians? katsy Jun 2016 #115
Those emails will show her bedrock support and statecraft machinations for TPP. AntiBank Jun 2016 #148
Well that clears up any question over whether Obama will let his DOJ indict her riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #118
Let's assume this is action is a template Hydra Jun 2016 #188
That's all very plausible. Still sucks for Bernie though nt riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #191
Bernie knew what he was getting into Hydra Jun 2016 #192
Honestly, I'm actually relieved for him. Climate change is upon us riderinthestorm Jun 2016 #193
Who could have predicted this? Spitfire of ATJ Jun 2016 #119
Never even crossed my mind. Enthusiast Jun 2016 #124
This should not be a surprise. MisterFred Jun 2016 #121
This message was self-deleted by its author N.Y. to Paris Jun 2016 #126
clinton tpo emails 3hummingbirds Jun 2016 #130
How can anyone seriously consider voting for Hillary when her e-mails and her speeches JDPriestly Jun 2016 #131
Mmmm...I love the smell of transparency in the morning.... truebrit71 Jun 2016 #136
"COG" ReRe Jun 2016 #146
rigging the election. Cobalt Violet Jun 2016 #147
way to hand fucking Trumpf a steel-forged hammer on 2 points AntiBank Jun 2016 #149
The establishment doesn't even bother to hide their corruption anymore. mudstump Jun 2016 #150
Of course Obama did...protecting his legacy you know. JimDandy Jun 2016 #151
Of course....nothing like a lack of transparency Chakaconcarne Jun 2016 #152
Anonymous "bat light" request LiberalLovinLug Jun 2016 #156
Good. Dr. Strange Jun 2016 #158
Very discouraging, in my opinion. ZombieHorde Jun 2016 #160
I'd like to hear her opinion on this stupidicus Jun 2016 #164
So no actual reason for the delay....except for politics. blackspade Jun 2016 #166
The FOIA office is overwhelmed creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #197
Having worked in government archives and on FOIA requests specifically.... blackspade Jun 2016 #209
Perhaps where you worked creeksneakers2 Jun 2016 #215
How perfectly appropriate. Business, as usual. nt Zorra Jun 2016 #170
Not Surprising At All colsohlibgal Jun 2016 #171
It's well known zentrum Jun 2016 #181
The State Department represents people who want Trump to win. mia Jun 2016 #187
Cornel West was right. Scuba Jun 2016 #206
I hope even Secretary Clinton supporters can appreciate how politically motivated this is Cooley Hurd Jun 2016 #207
And on to the courts we go. Vinca Jun 2016 #208
Isn't it interesting how tax payers can fund these e-mails without having access? MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #216
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»State Department Blocks R...