Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Midnight Writer

(25,098 posts)

14. What are the exact ethnic origins of the judge and lawyers in this case?

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Mon Jun 6, 2016, 10:43 PM

Jun 2016

I need that information before I can make an informed choice on this issue.

Michael Bekesha? Hmmm. I assume this "Michael" is of the male gender? How can he have legal standing against a female? And Bekesha? I don't even know where the hell that comes from. How can he have any legal authority over an American?

I pray on the Holy Blood of Our Savior Jesus Christ that President Donald Trump will soon take Office and spare Our Great Nation from the degradation of Our Constitution and stop the persecution of the Anglo-Saxons by the ethnic minority types.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

State Department official's lawyer repeatedly objects to questions on Clinton's email during deposit [View all] Omaha Steve Jun 2016 OP

Just plain shocking. libdem4life Jun 2016 #1

You just got to love this Right Wing Wellstone ruled Jun 2016 #2

Judicial watch is a great idea...has great supporters DemMomma4Sanders Jun 2016 #6

Judicial Watch is a creation of Larry Klayman Zorro Jun 2016 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author JDPriestly Jun 2016 #15

Yea and its sole purpose is to blow the whistle on gov corruption DemMomma4Sanders Jun 2016 #21

JW also has sued people in the Bush Administration zalinda Jun 2016 #25

Good. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #3

I bet the FBI liked dealing with these attorneys unc70 Jun 2016 #4

Your theory goes against the cover-your-ass rules. MisterFred Jun 2016 #18

"Vague" my ass. 7962 Jun 2016 #5

He's just doing what a lawyer does. It's maddening alfredo Jun 2016 #7

The lawyers are doing their job. Judicial Watch, the rightwing org, is on one of pnwmom Jun 2016 #8

PLEASE, let's stop this stuff finally, okay? George II Jun 2016 #9

Lawyers object to questions all the time at depositions. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #10

True. Was the question answered in spite of the objections? JDPriestly Jun 2016 #16

I dunno. I ordinary litigation the witness answers unless instructed not to geek tragedy Jun 2016 #17

Not true..counsels cannot guide testimony laserhaas Jun 2016 #22

Kick Babel_17 Jun 2016 #11

Accountability is for the little people. moondust Jun 2016 #12

Seems to be laserhaas Jun 2016 #23

What are the exact ethnic origins of the judge and lawyers in this case? Midnight Writer Jun 2016 #14

Keep stirring the Ring Wing Shit Pot! Cryptoad Jun 2016 #19

Kicked and recommended. Major Hogwash Jun 2016 #20

Agree..mucho danka's laserhaas Jun 2016 #24

Most excellent. Darb Jun 2016 #26