Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: New NSA docs contradict 9/11 claims [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Here is some explanation for why the hole appeared smaller than you would have expected. The wings collapsed in.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.asp
I said that because your wife thinks that a missile and not a plane hit the Pentagon. My neighbor was on Flight 77, and it never reached its destination, and my boss saw the plane hit - she called our office right after she called 911, so we knew that a plane had hit the Pentagon - way before anything could be faked. I believe that a plane hit the Pentagon because there are many, many other eyewitness accounts of a large, commercial airliner going into the Pentagon.
Many collected here with links to the sources:
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/evidence/witnesses/bart.html
There are tall office buildings and apartments there. There was not a mass hallucination in Arlington, VA the morning of 9/11.
If a missile hit the Pentagon at the same time, why hasn't anyone said that they saw one - and could identify it as clearly as the eyewitnesses identified a large aircraft?
No one saw fighters because there weren't any. Why? I don't know. I can't tell you that. I heard them a short time later.
If you want to ignore the photos of the plane wreckage around the Pentagon, fine. Please tell me how they managed that within seconds of the "missile" hitting and the mass hypnosis of people on I-395, Washington Blvd, and in the high rises around the Pentagon.
